PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PACIX vs. WESRX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PACIX vs. WESRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Columbia Convertible Securities Fund (PACIX) and TETON Convertible Securities Fund (WESRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PACIX achieves a 16.64% return, which is significantly higher than WESRX's 11.16% return. Over the past 10 years, PACIX has outperformed WESRX with an annualized return of 12.30%, while WESRX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.51% annualized return.


PACIX

1D
2.45%
1M
-3.45%
6M
10.26%
YTD
16.64%
1Y
28.55%
3Y*
15.41%
5Y*
6.44%
10Y*
12.30%
ALL TIME*
9.39%

WESRX

1D
3.16%
1M
-3.40%
6M
5.07%
YTD
11.16%
1Y
20.40%
3Y*
12.03%
5Y*
3.20%
10Y*
8.51%
ALL TIME*
7.39%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

PACIX vs. WESRX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PACIX
Columbia Convertible Securities Fund
16.64%19.58%9.51%11.91%-19.54%3.71%47.86%26.15%-1.03%15.07%
WESRX
TETON Convertible Securities Fund
11.16%17.20%11.73%5.09%-21.96%2.21%27.22%24.42%-0.80%17.58%

Correlation

The correlation between PACIX and WESRX is 0.96 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.94

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 1997

0.78

The correlation between PACIX and WESRX shifts across timeframes, from 0.78 (all time) to 0.96 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PACIX vs. WESRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PACIX
PACIX Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
PACIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PACIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
PACIX Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
PACIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
PACIX Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

WESRX
WESRX Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
WESRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WESRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
WESRX Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
WESRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
WESRX Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PACIX vs. WESRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Convertible Securities Fund (PACIX) and TETON Convertible Securities Fund (WESRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PACIXWESRXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.63

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.79

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.18

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.08

1.54

+1.53

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.65

4.02

+6.63

PACIX vs. WESRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PACIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.67, which is higher than the WESRX Sharpe Ratio of 1.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PACIX and WESRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PACIX vs. WESRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PACIX drawdown since its inception was -43.86%, smaller than the maximum WESRX drawdown of -51.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PACIX and WESRX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PACIXWESRXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.86%

-51.81%

+7.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.75%

-12.15%

+3.40%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.15%

-13.89%

+1.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.71%

-31.66%

+4.95%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.74%

-31.66%

+2.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.52%

-9.37%

+2.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.82%

-9.06%

+2.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.52%

4.65%

-2.13%

Volatility

PACIX vs. WESRX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Columbia Convertible Securities Fund (PACIX) is 5.08%, while TETON Convertible Securities Fund (WESRX) has a volatility of 6.20%. This indicates that PACIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WESRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PACIXWESRXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.08%

6.20%

-1.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.21%

14.81%

-1.60%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.17%

18.18%

-2.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.43%

14.75%

-1.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.56%

13.68%

-0.12%

PACIX vs. WESRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PACIX has a 1.12% expense ratio, which is lower than WESRX's 1.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

PACIX vs. WESRX - Dividend Comparison

PACIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.24%, less than WESRX's 6.95% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PACIX
Columbia Convertible Securities Fund
4.24%1.45%1.96%2.53%9.87%22.27%7.81%6.29%5.29%2.75%2.34%9.91%
WESRX
TETON Convertible Securities Fund
6.95%8.95%2.87%2.63%11.45%10.69%3.13%2.75%5.87%1.95%5.10%0.25%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, PACIX and WESRX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

WESRX has higher volatility (6.20%) compared to PACIX (5.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PACIX dropped -43.86% vs WESRX's -51.81%.

PACIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.67 vs 1.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PACIX and WESRX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer