PACEX vs. DBLLX
Compare and contrast key facts about T. Rowe Price Emerging Markets Corporate Bond Fund (PACEX) and DoubleLine Low Duration Emerging Markets Fixed Income Fund (DBLLX).
PACEX is managed by T. Rowe Price. It was launched on May 23, 2012. DBLLX is managed by DoubleLine. It was launched on Apr 6, 2014.
Performance
PACEX vs. DBLLX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PACEX vs. DBLLX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PACEX T. Rowe Price Emerging Markets Corporate Bond Fund | -1.68% | 8.38% | 6.64% | 6.38% | -13.41% | -2.01% | 6.59% | 12.82% | -1.80% | 8.88% |
DBLLX DoubleLine Low Duration Emerging Markets Fixed Income Fund | 0.02% | 7.86% | 7.20% | 7.00% | -5.05% | -0.21% | 3.53% | 8.57% | -0.04% | 4.20% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PACEX achieves a -1.68% return, which is significantly lower than DBLLX's 0.02% return. Over the past 10 years, PACEX has underperformed DBLLX with an annualized return of 3.41%, while DBLLX has yielded a comparatively higher 3.62% annualized return.
PACEX
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- -3.07%
- YTD
- -1.68%
- 6M
- -0.80%
- 1Y
- 4.32%
- 3Y*
- 6.13%
- 5Y*
- 0.75%
- 10Y*
- 3.41%
DBLLX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -0.92%
- YTD
- 0.02%
- 6M
- 1.20%
- 1Y
- 5.32%
- 3Y*
- 6.95%
- 5Y*
- 3.30%
- 10Y*
- 3.62%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PACEX vs. DBLLX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PACEX has a 1.16% expense ratio, which is higher than DBLLX's 0.59% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
PACEX vs. DBLLX — Risk / Return Rank
PACEX
DBLLX
PACEX vs. DBLLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Emerging Markets Corporate Bond Fund (PACEX) and DoubleLine Low Duration Emerging Markets Fixed Income Fund (DBLLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PACEX | DBLLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.47 | 3.75 | -2.28 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.02 | 5.19 | -3.17 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 2.29 | -0.93 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.40 | 4.05 | -2.65 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.25 | 21.50 | -16.25 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PACEX | DBLLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.47 | 3.75 | -2.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.22 | 1.72 | -1.49 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.84 | 1.91 | -1.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.94 | 1.68 | -0.73 |
Correlation
The correlation between PACEX and DBLLX is 0.55, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
PACEX vs. DBLLX - Dividend Comparison
PACEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.19%, more than DBLLX's 5.01% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PACEX T. Rowe Price Emerging Markets Corporate Bond Fund | 5.19% | 5.50% | 4.76% | 3.86% | 3.06% | 3.36% | 3.85% | 4.26% | 4.46% | 3.94% | 4.27% | 4.92% |
DBLLX DoubleLine Low Duration Emerging Markets Fixed Income Fund | 5.01% | 5.27% | 4.70% | 3.74% | 2.41% | 2.15% | 2.61% | 4.93% | 2.87% | 3.00% | 3.19% | 3.77% |
Drawdowns
PACEX vs. DBLLX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PACEX drawdown since its inception was -23.40%, which is greater than DBLLX's maximum drawdown of -10.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PACEX and DBLLX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PACEX | DBLLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.40% | -10.13% | -13.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.35% | -1.35% | -2.00% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.40% | -10.13% | -13.27% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -23.40% | -10.13% | -13.27% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.07% | -0.92% | -2.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.20% | -1.31% | -2.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.89% | 0.25% | +0.64% |
Volatility
PACEX vs. DBLLX - Volatility Comparison
T. Rowe Price Emerging Markets Corporate Bond Fund (PACEX) has a higher volatility of 0.88% compared to DoubleLine Low Duration Emerging Markets Fixed Income Fund (DBLLX) at 0.35%. This indicates that PACEX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DBLLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PACEX | DBLLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.88% | 0.35% | +0.53% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.86% | 0.75% | +1.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.20% | 1.43% | +1.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.44% | 1.93% | +1.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.06% | 1.90% | +2.16% |