PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PACEX vs. PBDIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PACEX vs. PBDIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Emerging Markets Corporate Bond Fund (PACEX) and T. Rowe Price QM U.S. Bond Index Fund (PBDIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PACEX achieves a 0.43% return, which is significantly higher than PBDIX's -0.45% return. Over the past 10 years, PACEX has outperformed PBDIX with an annualized return of 2.96%, while PBDIX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.06% annualized return.


PACEX

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.65%
6M
-0.57%
YTD
0.43%
1Y
3.78%
3Y*
6.10%
5Y*
0.89%
10Y*
2.96%
ALL TIME*
3.76%

PBDIX

1D
0.00%
1M
-1.25%
6M
-0.60%
YTD
-0.45%
1Y
2.16%
3Y*
5.60%
5Y*
0.78%
10Y*
2.06%
ALL TIME*
3.89%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

PACEX vs. PBDIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PACEX
T. Rowe Price Emerging Markets Corporate Bond Fund
0.43%8.38%6.64%6.38%-13.41%-2.01%6.59%12.82%-1.80%8.88%
PBDIX
T. Rowe Price QM U.S. Bond Index Fund
-0.45%8.29%4.75%8.62%-14.24%-1.45%8.17%8.69%-0.01%3.83%

Correlation

The correlation between PACEX and PBDIX is 0.55, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.55

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.62

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.48

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.43

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 25, 2012

0.37

The correlation between PACEX and PBDIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.37 (all time) to 0.62 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PACEX vs. PBDIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PACEX
PACEX Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
PACEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PACEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
PACEX Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
PACEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
PACEX Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

PBDIX
PBDIX Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
PBDIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PBDIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
PBDIX Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
PBDIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
PBDIX Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PACEX vs. PBDIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Emerging Markets Corporate Bond Fund (PACEX) and T. Rowe Price QM U.S. Bond Index Fund (PBDIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PACEXPBDIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.82

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.56

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.13

+0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.23

1.05

+0.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.76

2.70

+2.06

PACEX vs. PBDIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PACEX Sharpe Ratio is 1.57, which is higher than the PBDIX Sharpe Ratio of 0.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PACEX and PBDIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PACEX vs. PBDIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PACEX drawdown since its inception was -23.40%, which is greater than PBDIX's maximum drawdown of -19.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PACEX and PBDIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PACEXPBDIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.40%

-19.20%

-4.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.18%

-2.94%

-0.24%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.64%

-4.87%

+1.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.40%

-19.10%

-4.30%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-23.40%

-19.20%

-4.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.00%

-2.24%

+1.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.12%

-2.16%

-1.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.82%

1.14%

-0.32%

Volatility

PACEX vs. PBDIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for T. Rowe Price Emerging Markets Corporate Bond Fund (PACEX) is 0.39%, while T. Rowe Price QM U.S. Bond Index Fund (PBDIX) has a volatility of 1.00%. This indicates that PACEX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PBDIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PACEXPBDIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.39%

1.00%

-0.61%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.00%

3.24%

-1.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.54%

4.14%

-1.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.47%

6.13%

-2.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.05%

5.03%

-0.98%

PACEX vs. PBDIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PACEX has a 1.16% expense ratio, which is higher than PBDIX's 0.23% expense ratio.


Dividends

PACEX vs. PBDIX - Dividend Comparison

PACEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.64%, more than PBDIX's 4.33% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PACEX
T. Rowe Price Emerging Markets Corporate Bond Fund
4.64%5.50%4.76%3.86%3.06%3.36%3.85%4.26%4.46%3.94%4.27%4.92%
PBDIX
T. Rowe Price QM U.S. Bond Index Fund
4.33%5.19%7.21%6.39%2.01%1.84%3.59%3.18%2.94%2.75%2.82%2.99%

Frequently Asked Questions


PACEX and PBDIX have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PBDIX has higher volatility (1.00%) compared to PACEX (0.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PACEX dropped -23.40% vs PBDIX's -19.20%.

PACEX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.57 vs 0.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PACEX and PBDIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer