PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PACEX vs. GMOQX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PACEX vs. GMOQX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Emerging Markets Corporate Bond Fund (PACEX) and GMO Emerging Country Debt Fund Class VI (GMOQX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PACEX achieves a 1.41% return, which is significantly lower than GMOQX's 9.53% return.


PACEX

1D
0.00%
1M
1.10%
YTD
1.41%
6M
2.02%
1Y
7.15%
3Y*
6.97%
5Y*
1.08%
10Y*
3.43%

GMOQX

1D
0.08%
1M
2.33%
YTD
9.53%
6M
9.72%
1Y
26.55%
3Y*
19.53%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PACEX vs. GMOQX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
PACEX
T. Rowe Price Emerging Markets Corporate Bond Fund
1.41%8.38%6.64%6.38%-13.41%-2.50%
GMOQX
GMO Emerging Country Debt Fund Class VI
9.53%22.45%12.60%17.76%-16.26%-2.20%

Correlation

The correlation between PACEX and GMOQX is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.52

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 16, 2021

0.64

The correlation between PACEX and GMOQX shifts across timeframes, from 0.52 (1 year) to 0.64 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PACEX vs. GMOQX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PACEX
PACEX Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
PACEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PACEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
PACEX Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
PACEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
PACEX Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

GMOQX
GMOQX Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
GMOQX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GMOQX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
GMOQX Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
GMOQX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
GMOQX Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PACEX vs. GMOQX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Emerging Markets Corporate Bond Fund (PACEX) and GMO Emerging Country Debt Fund Class VI (GMOQX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PACEXGMOQXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.87

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.73

2.21

-0.48

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.26

6.93

-4.67

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.17

30.08

-20.91

PACEX vs. GMOQX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PACEX Sharpe Ratio is 2.77, which is lower than the GMOQX Sharpe Ratio of 4.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PACEX and GMOQX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PACEX vs. GMOQX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PACEX drawdown since its inception was -23.40%, smaller than the maximum GMOQX drawdown of -31.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PACEX and GMOQX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PACEXGMOQXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.40%

-31.41%

+8.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.18%

-3.82%

+0.64%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.81%

-9.02%

+5.21%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.40%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-23.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.11%

-0.20%

+0.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.14%

-9.61%

+5.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.78%

0.88%

-0.10%

Volatility

PACEX vs. GMOQX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for T. Rowe Price Emerging Markets Corporate Bond Fund (PACEX) is 0.77%, while GMO Emerging Country Debt Fund Class VI (GMOQX) has a volatility of 1.17%. This indicates that PACEX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GMOQX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PACEXGMOQXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.77%

1.17%

-0.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.06%

4.41%

-2.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.60%

5.34%

-2.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.48%

10.83%

-7.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.06%

10.83%

-6.77%

PACEX vs. GMOQX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PACEX has a 1.16% expense ratio, which is higher than GMOQX's 0.51% expense ratio.


Dividends

PACEX vs. GMOQX - Dividend Comparison

PACEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.50%, less than GMOQX's 5.82% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GMOQX
GMO Emerging Country Debt Fund Class VI
5.82%6.37%6.23%10.36%13.87%7.44%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PACEX
T. Rowe Price Emerging Markets Corporate Bond Fund
5.50%5.50%4.76%3.86%3.06%3.36%3.85%4.26%4.46%3.94%4.27%4.92%

Frequently Asked Questions


PACEX and GMOQX have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GMOQX has higher volatility (1.17%) compared to PACEX (0.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PACEX dropped -23.40% vs GMOQX's -31.41%.

GMOQX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.96 vs 2.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PACEX and GMOQX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer