PACEX vs. EDF
PACEX (T. Rowe Price Emerging Markets Corporate Bond Fund) and EDF (Virtus Stone Harbor Emerging Markets Income Fund) are both Emerging Markets Bonds funds. Over the past 10 years, PACEX returned 3.43%/yr vs 5.46%/yr for EDF. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PACEX charges 1.16%/yr vs 1.45%/yr for EDF.
Performance
PACEX vs. EDF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PACEX achieves a 1.41% return, which is significantly lower than EDF's 21.21% return. Over the past 10 years, PACEX has underperformed EDF with an annualized return of 3.43%, while EDF has yielded a comparatively higher 5.46% annualized return.
PACEX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 1.10%
- YTD
- 1.41%
- 6M
- 2.02%
- 1Y
- 7.15%
- 3Y*
- 6.97%
- 5Y*
- 1.08%
- 10Y*
- 3.43%
EDF
- 1D
- -0.71%
- 1M
- 7.79%
- YTD
- 21.21%
- 6M
- 25.24%
- 1Y
- 30.29%
- 3Y*
- 26.69%
- 5Y*
- 6.12%
- 10Y*
- 5.46%
PACEX vs. EDF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PACEX T. Rowe Price Emerging Markets Corporate Bond Fund | 1.41% | 8.38% | 6.64% | 6.38% | -13.41% | -2.01% | 6.59% | 12.82% | -1.80% | 8.88% |
EDF Virtus Stone Harbor Emerging Markets Income Fund | 21.21% | 22.24% | 25.54% | 21.63% | -27.96% | -8.47% | -31.14% | 45.06% | -18.24% | 24.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between PACEX and EDF is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 25, 2012 | 0.28 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PACEX vs. EDF — Risk / Return Rank
PACEX
EDF
PACEX vs. EDF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Emerging Markets Corporate Bond Fund (PACEX) and Virtus Stone Harbor Emerging Markets Income Fund (EDF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PACEX | EDF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.71 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.96 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.73 | 1.37 | +0.36 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.26 | 3.22 | -0.97 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.17 | 12.35 | -3.18 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PACEX vs. EDF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PACEX drawdown since its inception was -23.40%, smaller than the maximum EDF drawdown of -64.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PACEX and EDF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PACEX | EDF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.40% | -64.23% | +40.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.18% | -9.44% | +6.26% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -3.81% | -24.32% | +20.51% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.40% | -52.47% | +29.07% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -23.40% | -64.23% | +40.83% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.11% | -0.71% | +0.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.14% | -21.42% | +17.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.78% | 2.46% | -1.68% |
Volatility
PACEX vs. EDF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for T. Rowe Price Emerging Markets Corporate Bond Fund (PACEX) is 0.77%, while Virtus Stone Harbor Emerging Markets Income Fund (EDF) has a volatility of 4.86%. This indicates that PACEX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EDF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PACEX | EDF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.77% | 4.86% | -4.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.06% | 12.07% | -10.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.60% | 14.84% | -12.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.48% | 25.71% | -22.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.06% | 30.71% | -26.65% |
PACEX vs. EDF - Expense Ratio Comparison
PACEX has a 1.16% expense ratio, which is lower than EDF's 1.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
PACEX vs. EDF - Dividend Comparison
PACEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.50%, less than EDF's 12.81% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EDF Virtus Stone Harbor Emerging Markets Income Fund | 12.81% | 14.49% | 15.32% | 16.71% | 17.31% | 12.91% | 16.46% | 15.67% | 19.37% | 13.58% | 14.75% | 17.93% |
PACEX T. Rowe Price Emerging Markets Corporate Bond Fund | 5.50% | 5.50% | 4.76% | 3.86% | 3.06% | 3.36% | 3.85% | 4.26% | 4.46% | 3.94% | 4.27% | 4.92% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PACEX and EDF have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EDF has higher volatility (4.86%) compared to PACEX (0.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PACEX dropped -23.40% vs EDF's -64.23%.
PACEX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.77 vs 2.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PACEX and EDF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer