PAC vs. HYMC

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

PAC (Grupo Aeroportuario del Pacífico, S.A.B. de C.V.) and HYMC (Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation) are both stocks. PAC operates in Airports & Air Services (Industrials), while HYMC operates in Gold (Basic Materials). Over the past 5 years, PAC returned 20.66%/yr vs -6.73%/yr for HYMC. At a 0.11 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

PAC vs. HYMC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Grupo Aeroportuario del Pacífico, S.A.B. de C.V. (PAC) and Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation (HYMC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PAC achieves a -10.14% return, which is significantly lower than HYMC's 8.37% return.

PAC

• 1D: 3.08%
• 1M: -3.26%
• YTD: -10.14%
• 6M: -8.95%
• 1Y: 3.29%
• 3Y*: 12.84%
• 5Y*: 20.66%
• 10Y*: 14.31%

HYMC

• 1D: 2.26%
• 1M: -40.96%
• YTD: 8.37%
• 6M: 92.24%
• 1Y: 657.65%
• 3Y*: 98.71%
• 5Y*: -6.73%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PAC vs. HYMC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
PAC Grupo Aeroportuario del Pacífico, S.A.B. de C.V.	-10.14%	56.30%	4.19%	28.64%	9.79%	29.95%	-6.17%	54.36%	-13.06%
HYMC Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation	8.37%	975.57%	-9.80%	-53.96%	-13.30%	-92.18%	-24.03%	4.59%	3.35%

Correlation

The correlation between PAC and HYMC is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.13
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.19
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.16
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 12, 2018	0.11

Fundamentals

Market Cap PAC : $11.97B HYMC : $2.31B
EPS PAC : MX$214.01 HYMC : -$1.64
PB Ratio PAC : 8.03 HYMC : 10.33
Total Revenue (TTM) PAC : MX$32.84B HYMC : $0.00
Gross Profit (TTM) PAC : MX$10.93B HYMC : -$4.65M
EBITDA (TTM) PAC : MX$20.54B HYMC : -$69.17M

Return for Risk

PAC vs. HYMC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PAC

PAC Risk / Return Rank: 44
PAC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 46
PAC Sortino Ratio Rank: 41
PAC Omega Ratio Rank: 40
PAC Calmar Ratio Rank: 47
PAC Martin Ratio Rank: 46

HYMC

HYMC Risk / Return Rank: 97
HYMC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
HYMC Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
HYMC Omega Ratio Rank: 94
HYMC Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
HYMC Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PAC vs. HYMC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Grupo Aeroportuario del Pacífico, S.A.B. de C.V. (PAC) and Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation (HYMC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PAC	HYMC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.11	5.62	-5.52
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.36	4.20	-3.83
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.04	1.51	-0.46
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.13	11.29	-11.17
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.27	30.24	-29.97

PAC vs. HYMC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PAC Sharpe Ratio is 0.11, which is lower than the HYMC Sharpe Ratio of 5.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PAC and HYMC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PAC vs. HYMC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PAC drawdown since its inception was -73.20%, smaller than the maximum HYMC drawdown of -98.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PAC and HYMC.

Drawdown Indicators

	PAC	HYMC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-73.20%	-98.89%	+25.69%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-26.19%	-58.77%	+32.58%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-42.83%	-63.45%	+20.62%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-42.83%	-94.96%	+52.13%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-66.65%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-21.14%	-83.72%	+62.58%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-16.52%	-63.36%	+46.84%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	12.29%	21.95%	-9.66%

Volatility

PAC vs. HYMC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Grupo Aeroportuario del Pacífico, S.A.B. de C.V. (PAC) is 10.37%, while Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation (HYMC) has a volatility of 24.71%. This indicates that PAC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HYMC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PAC	HYMC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.37%	24.71%	-14.34%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	25.96%	95.63%	-69.67%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	31.04%	120.00%	-88.96%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	36.11%	152.60%	-116.49%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	38.51%	122.97%	-84.46%

Dividends

PAC vs. HYMC - Dividend Comparison

PAC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.89%, while HYMC has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
HYMC Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
PAC Grupo Aeroportuario del Pacífico, S.A.B. de C.V.	1.89%	3.33%	4.14%	4.88%	5.02%	4.17%	0.00%	4.99%	6.27%	5.83%	4.50%	3.98%

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PAC and HYMC in my portfolio?

PAC and HYMC have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PAC or HYMC?

HYMC has higher volatility (24.71%) compared to PAC (10.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PAC dropped -73.20% vs HYMC's -98.89%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

HYMC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.62 vs 0.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.