PAC.DE vs. IQQT.DE
PAC.DE (BNP Paribas Easy MSCI Pacific ex Japan ESG Filtered Min TE UCITS ETF) and IQQT.DE (iShares MSCI Taiwan UCITS ETF) are both Asia Pacific Equities funds - PAC.DE tracks the MSCI Pacific ex Japan ESG Filtered Min TE while IQQT.DE tracks the MSCI Taiwan 20/35. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, PAC.DE returned 5.97%/yr vs 22.82%/yr for IQQT.DE. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PAC.DE charges 0.16%/yr vs 0.74%/yr for IQQT.DE.
Performance
PAC.DE vs. IQQT.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PAC.DE achieves a 8.00% return, which is significantly lower than IQQT.DE's 70.08% return.
PAC.DE
- 1D
- -0.85%
- 1M
- -0.06%
- YTD
- 8.00%
- 6M
- 9.57%
- 1Y
- 12.71%
- 3Y*
- 9.63%
- 5Y*
- 5.97%
- 10Y*
- —
IQQT.DE
- 1D
- -1.61%
- 1M
- 14.31%
- YTD
- 70.08%
- 6M
- 75.07%
- 1Y
- 111.86%
- 3Y*
- 40.38%
- 5Y*
- 22.82%
- 10Y*
- 21.81%
PAC.DE vs. IQQT.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PAC.DE BNP Paribas Easy MSCI Pacific ex Japan ESG Filtered Min TE UCITS ETF | 8.00% | 6.73% | 12.07% | 2.38% | 0.50% | 12.85% | -2.66% | 21.45% | -6.04% | 10.46% |
IQQT.DE iShares MSCI Taiwan UCITS ETF | 70.08% | 17.20% | 30.72% | 24.49% | -25.21% | 38.46% | 22.44% | 39.61% | -5.81% | 12.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between PAC.DE and IQQT.DE is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 19, 2016 | 0.61 |
The correlation between PAC.DE and IQQT.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.55 to 0.61 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PAC.DE vs. IQQT.DE — Risk / Return Rank
PAC.DE
IQQT.DE
PAC.DE vs. IQQT.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNP Paribas Easy MSCI Pacific ex Japan ESG Filtered Min TE UCITS ETF (PAC.DE) and iShares MSCI Taiwan UCITS ETF (IQQT.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PAC.DE | IQQT.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.54 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.70 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.72 | -0.53 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.00 | 12.46 | -10.46 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.65 | 35.53 | -29.89 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PAC.DE | IQQT.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.08 | 4.62 | -3.54 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.41 | 1.03 | -0.62 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.04 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.43 | 0.48 | -0.05 |
Drawdowns
PAC.DE vs. IQQT.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PAC.DE drawdown since its inception was -36.90%, smaller than the maximum IQQT.DE drawdown of -57.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PAC.DE and IQQT.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PAC.DE | IQQT.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.90% | -57.60% | +20.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.33% | -8.93% | +2.60% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.21% | -31.65% | +11.44% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.21% | -32.51% | +12.30% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -32.51% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.33% | -1.61% | -0.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.10% | -12.71% | +7.61% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.25% | 3.14% | -0.89% |
Volatility
PAC.DE vs. IQQT.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for BNP Paribas Easy MSCI Pacific ex Japan ESG Filtered Min TE UCITS ETF (PAC.DE) is 3.19%, while iShares MSCI Taiwan UCITS ETF (IQQT.DE) has a volatility of 10.13%. This indicates that PAC.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IQQT.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PAC.DE | IQQT.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.19% | 10.13% | -6.94% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.91% | 19.53% | -10.62% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.77% | 24.10% | -12.33% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.54% | 21.89% | -7.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.52% | 20.80% | -4.28% |
PAC.DE vs. IQQT.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
PAC.DE has a 0.16% expense ratio, which is lower than IQQT.DE's 0.74% expense ratio.
Dividends
PAC.DE vs. IQQT.DE - Dividend Comparison
PAC.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IQQT.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.89%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IQQT.DE iShares MSCI Taiwan UCITS ETF | 0.89% | 1.51% | 1.36% | 2.17% | 3.61% | 1.31% | 1.80% | 2.17% | 2.76% | 2.74% | 2.91% | 3.26% |
PAC.DE BNP Paribas Easy MSCI Pacific ex Japan ESG Filtered Min TE UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PAC.DE and IQQT.DE have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PAC.DE is cheaper at 0.16% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PAC.DE is cheaper with a 0.16% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for IQQT.DE.
PAC.DE tracks MSCI Pacific ex Japan ESG Filtered Min TE, while IQQT.DE tracks MSCI Taiwan 20/35. They also come from different issuers: BNP Paribas and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.16% for PAC.DE and 0.74% for IQQT.DE.
Find the right allocation for PAC.DE and IQQT.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer