IQQT.DE vs. DBX5.DE
IQQT.DE (iShares MSCI Taiwan UCITS ETF) and DBX5.DE (Xtrackers MSCI Taiwan UCITS ETF 1C) are both Asia Pacific Equities funds - IQQT.DE tracks the MSCI Taiwan 20/35 while DBX5.DE tracks the MSCI Taiwan 20/35 Custom. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IQQT.DE returned 21.81%/yr vs 22.04%/yr for DBX5.DE. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IQQT.DE charges 0.74%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for DBX5.DE.
Performance
IQQT.DE vs. DBX5.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with IQQT.DE having a 70.08% return and DBX5.DE slightly lower at 69.45%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with IQQT.DE having a 21.81% annualized return and DBX5.DE not far ahead at 22.04%.
IQQT.DE
- 1D
- -1.61%
- 1M
- 14.31%
- YTD
- 70.08%
- 6M
- 75.07%
- 1Y
- 111.86%
- 3Y*
- 40.38%
- 5Y*
- 22.82%
- 10Y*
- 21.81%
DBX5.DE
- 1D
- -1.95%
- 1M
- 14.40%
- YTD
- 69.45%
- 6M
- 74.72%
- 1Y
- 112.23%
- 3Y*
- 40.65%
- 5Y*
- 22.99%
- 10Y*
- 22.04%
IQQT.DE vs. DBX5.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IQQT.DE iShares MSCI Taiwan UCITS ETF | 70.08% | 17.20% | 30.72% | 24.49% | -25.21% | 38.46% | 22.44% | 39.61% | -5.81% | 12.48% |
DBX5.DE Xtrackers MSCI Taiwan UCITS ETF 1C | 69.45% | 18.33% | 31.08% | 24.15% | -25.19% | 37.79% | 24.51% | 39.18% | -5.55% | 12.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between IQQT.DE and DBX5.DE is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 13, 2007 | 0.94 |
The correlation between IQQT.DE and DBX5.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IQQT.DE vs. DBX5.DE — Risk / Return Rank
IQQT.DE
DBX5.DE
IQQT.DE vs. DBX5.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Taiwan UCITS ETF (IQQT.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI Taiwan UCITS ETF 1C (DBX5.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IQQT.DE | DBX5.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.00 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.02 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.72 | 1.74 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 12.46 | 12.09 | +0.36 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 35.53 | 35.84 | -0.31 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IQQT.DE | DBX5.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.62 | 4.62 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.03 | 1.05 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.04 | 1.06 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.48 | 0.54 | -0.06 |
Drawdowns
IQQT.DE vs. DBX5.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IQQT.DE drawdown since its inception was -57.60%, roughly equal to the maximum DBX5.DE drawdown of -55.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IQQT.DE and DBX5.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IQQT.DE | DBX5.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -57.60% | -55.28% | -2.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.93% | -9.23% | +0.30% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -31.65% | -30.81% | -0.84% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.51% | -32.62% | +0.11% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.51% | -32.62% | +0.11% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.61% | -1.97% | +0.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.71% | -11.61% | -1.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.14% | 3.12% | +0.02% |
Volatility
IQQT.DE vs. DBX5.DE - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI Taiwan UCITS ETF (IQQT.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI Taiwan UCITS ETF 1C (DBX5.DE) have volatilities of 10.13% and 10.28%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IQQT.DE | DBX5.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.13% | 10.28% | -0.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.53% | 19.59% | -0.06% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.10% | 24.18% | -0.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.89% | 21.58% | +0.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.80% | 20.55% | +0.25% |
IQQT.DE vs. DBX5.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
IQQT.DE has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than DBX5.DE's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
IQQT.DE vs. DBX5.DE - Dividend Comparison
IQQT.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.89%, while DBX5.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBX5.DE Xtrackers MSCI Taiwan UCITS ETF 1C | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IQQT.DE iShares MSCI Taiwan UCITS ETF | 0.89% | 1.51% | 1.36% | 2.17% | 3.61% | 1.31% | 1.80% | 2.17% | 2.76% | 2.74% | 2.91% | 3.26% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.99, IQQT.DE and DBX5.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, DBX5.DE is cheaper at 0.65% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DBX5.DE is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for IQQT.DE.
IQQT.DE tracks MSCI Taiwan 20/35, while DBX5.DE tracks MSCI Taiwan 20/35 Custom. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for IQQT.DE and 0.65% for DBX5.DE.
Find the right allocation for IQQT.DE and DBX5.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer