PABU vs. SPTM

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

PABU (iShares Paris-Aligned Climate Optimized MSCI USA ETF) and SPTM (SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds - PABU tracks the MSCI USA Climate Paris Aligned Benchmark Extended Select PAB Index (USD) while SPTM tracks the S&P Composite 1500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, PABU returned 20.14%/yr vs 21.90%/yr for SPTM. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. PABU charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for SPTM.

Performance

PABU vs. SPTM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Paris-Aligned Climate Optimized MSCI USA ETF (PABU) and SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF (SPTM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PABU achieves a 9.39% return, which is significantly lower than SPTM's 11.10% return.

PABU

• 1D: -1.29%
• 1M: 7.47%
• YTD: 9.39%
• 6M: 9.10%
• 1Y: 23.78%
• 3Y*: 20.14%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SPTM

• 1D: -0.67%
• 1M: 4.87%
• YTD: 11.10%
• 6M: 11.13%
• 1Y: 27.84%
• 3Y*: 21.90%
• 5Y*: 13.38%
• 10Y*: 15.21%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PABU vs. SPTM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
PABU iShares Paris-Aligned Climate Optimized MSCI USA ETF	9.39%	13.08%	24.84%	29.51%	-15.45%
SPTM SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF	11.10%	16.93%	23.87%	25.55%	-11.41%

Correlation

The correlation between PABU and SPTM is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.95
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.96
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 14, 2022	0.93

The correlation between PABU and SPTM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

PABU vs. SPTM - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	PABU	SPTM
Technology	44.9%	34.0%
Real Estate	12.4%	2.3%
Financial Services	11.2%	12.1%
Communication Services	10.4%	10.5%
Consumer Cyclical	9.0%	10.3%
Healthcare	7.4%	8.6%
Industrials	2.5%	9.4%
Utilities	1.8%	2.3%
Energy	0.7%	3.7%
Basic Materials	0.5%	2.0%
Consumer Defensive	-	4.8%

Return for Risk

PABU vs. SPTM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PABU

PABU Risk / Return Rank: 46
PABU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 52
PABU Sortino Ratio Rank: 51
PABU Omega Ratio Rank: 50
PABU Calmar Ratio Rank: 36
PABU Martin Ratio Rank: 40

SPTM

SPTM Risk / Return Rank: 70
SPTM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
SPTM Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
SPTM Omega Ratio Rank: 69
SPTM Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
SPTM Martin Ratio Rank: 76

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PABU vs. SPTM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Paris-Aligned Climate Optimized MSCI USA ETF (PABU) and SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF (SPTM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PABU	SPTM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.79	2.36	-0.57
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.48	3.23	-0.75
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.31	1.43	-0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.78	3.22	-1.44
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.25	15.01	-8.77
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PABU vs. SPTM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PABU Sharpe Ratio is 1.79, which is comparable to the SPTM Sharpe Ratio of 2.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PABU and SPTM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PABU	SPTM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.79	2.36	-0.57
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.80	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.85	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.73	0.46	+0.27

Drawdowns

PABU vs. SPTM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PABU drawdown since its inception was -22.76%, smaller than the maximum SPTM drawdown of -54.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PABU and SPTM.

Drawdown Indicators

	PABU	SPTM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-22.76%	-54.80%	+32.04%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.40%	-8.68%	-4.72%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-20.85%	-18.87%	-1.98%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-24.14%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-34.66%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.29%	-0.67%	-0.62%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.63%	-9.05%	+3.42%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.82%	1.86%	+1.96%

Volatility

PABU vs. SPTM - Volatility Comparison

iShares Paris-Aligned Climate Optimized MSCI USA ETF (PABU) has a higher volatility of 3.70% compared to SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF (SPTM) at 2.88%. This indicates that PABU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPTM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PABU	SPTM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.70%	2.88%	+0.82%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.24%	8.92%	+1.32%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.37%	11.88%	+1.49%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.68%	16.87%	+1.81%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.68%	18.03%	+0.65%

PABU vs. SPTM - Expense Ratio Comparison

PABU has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is higher than SPTM's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

PABU vs. SPTM - Dividend Comparison

PABU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.86%, less than SPTM's 1.04% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PABU iShares Paris-Aligned Climate Optimized MSCI USA ETF	0.86%	0.90%	1.00%	1.06%	1.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SPTM SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF	1.04%	1.13%	1.28%	1.44%	1.69%	1.25%	1.56%	1.72%	1.90%	1.66%	1.91%	1.92%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PABU and SPTM in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.95, PABU and SPTM move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, PABU or SPTM?

PABU has higher volatility (3.70%) compared to SPTM (2.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PABU dropped -22.76% vs SPTM's -54.80%.

Which ETF is better, PABU or SPTM?

On 3-year performance, SPTM leads with 21.90% vs 20.14% for PABU. On fees, SPTM is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, SPTM has been the lower-risk option at 2.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PABU or SPTM?

Over the 3-year period, SPTM has performed better with a 21.90% return vs 20.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PABU or SPTM?

SPTM is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for PABU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PABU or SPTM?

SPTM has the higher dividend yield at 1.04%, compared with 0.86% for PABU.

What is the main difference between PABU and SPTM?

PABU tracks MSCI USA Climate Paris Aligned Benchmark Extended Select PAB Index (USD), while SPTM tracks S&P Composite 1500 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for PABU and 0.03% for SPTM.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SPTM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.36 vs 1.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.