PABFX vs. PTRQX
Compare and contrast key facts about PGIM Balanced Fund (PABFX) and PGIM Total Return Bond R6 (PTRQX).
PABFX is managed by PGIM. It was launched on Jan 3, 1993. PTRQX is managed by PGIM. It was launched on Dec 27, 2010.
Performance
PABFX vs. PTRQX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PABFX vs. PTRQX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PABFX PGIM Balanced Fund | -3.30% | 15.83% | 19.80% | 17.08% | -16.07% | 14.68% | 9.12% | 21.77% | -5.16% | 14.36% |
PTRQX PGIM Total Return Bond R6 | -0.59% | 7.81% | 3.06% | 7.80% | -14.30% | -1.37% | 8.13% | 10.85% | -0.73% | 6.67% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PABFX achieves a -3.30% return, which is significantly lower than PTRQX's -0.59% return. Over the past 10 years, PABFX has outperformed PTRQX with an annualized return of 8.74%, while PTRQX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.64% annualized return.
PABFX
- 1D
- -0.17%
- 1M
- -6.30%
- YTD
- -3.30%
- 6M
- -0.47%
- 1Y
- 13.40%
- 3Y*
- 14.35%
- 5Y*
- 7.75%
- 10Y*
- 8.74%
PTRQX
- 1D
- 0.50%
- 1M
- -2.59%
- YTD
- -0.59%
- 6M
- 0.54%
- 1Y
- 4.26%
- 3Y*
- 4.89%
- 5Y*
- 1.09%
- 10Y*
- 2.64%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PABFX vs. PTRQX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PABFX has a 0.78% expense ratio, which is higher than PTRQX's 0.39% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
PABFX vs. PTRQX — Risk / Return Rank
PABFX
PTRQX
PABFX vs. PTRQX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Balanced Fund (PABFX) and PGIM Total Return Bond R6 (PTRQX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PABFX | PTRQX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.23 | 1.09 | +0.15 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.78 | 1.54 | +0.23 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.19 | +0.07 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.54 | 1.74 | -0.20 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.98 | 5.23 | +1.74 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PABFX | PTRQX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.23 | 1.09 | +0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.65 | 0.18 | +0.47 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.76 | 0.51 | +0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.67 | 0.75 | -0.08 |
Correlation
The correlation between PABFX and PTRQX is 0.07, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
PABFX vs. PTRQX - Dividend Comparison
PABFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.84%, more than PTRQX's 4.28% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PABFX PGIM Balanced Fund | 9.84% | 9.57% | 13.25% | 2.35% | 2.09% | 12.40% | 1.66% | 5.18% | 7.55% | 5.78% | 4.79% | 8.06% |
PTRQX PGIM Total Return Bond R6 | 4.28% | 4.63% | 4.89% | 4.70% | 5.83% | 2.82% | 3.05% | 6.95% | 3.99% | 2.93% | 4.01% | 3.11% |
Drawdowns
PABFX vs. PTRQX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PABFX drawdown since its inception was -40.90%, which is greater than PTRQX's maximum drawdown of -20.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PABFX and PTRQX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PABFX | PTRQX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.90% | -20.72% | -20.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.13% | -3.08% | -5.05% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.24% | -20.69% | -0.55% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -26.46% | -20.72% | -5.74% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.74% | -2.59% | -4.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.80% | -3.31% | -1.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.80% | 1.03% | +0.77% |
Volatility
PABFX vs. PTRQX - Volatility Comparison
PGIM Balanced Fund (PABFX) has a higher volatility of 3.53% compared to PGIM Total Return Bond R6 (PTRQX) at 1.59%. This indicates that PABFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PTRQX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PABFX | PTRQX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.53% | 1.59% | +1.94% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.25% | 2.62% | +3.63% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.09% | 4.48% | +6.61% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.90% | 5.98% | +5.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.55% | 5.22% | +6.33% |