PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
PABFX vs. PABAX
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between PABFX and PABAX is 0.92, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


-0.50.00.51.00.9

Performance

PABFX vs. PABAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM Balanced Fund (PABFX) and Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Balanced Fund (PABAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%2.00%4.00%6.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-0.79%
-2.97%
PABFX
PABAX

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

PABFX:

0.87

PABAX:

0.54

Sortino Ratio

PABFX:

1.15

PABAX:

0.67

Omega Ratio

PABFX:

1.17

PABAX:

1.15

Calmar Ratio

PABFX:

0.87

PABAX:

0.50

Martin Ratio

PABFX:

2.80

PABAX:

1.66

Ulcer Index

PABFX:

2.94%

PABAX:

4.20%

Daily Std Dev

PABFX:

9.42%

PABAX:

13.03%

Max Drawdown

PABFX:

-45.40%

PABAX:

-44.43%

Current Drawdown

PABFX:

-5.16%

PABAX:

-8.31%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PABFX achieves a 2.97% return, which is significantly lower than PABAX's 3.34% return. Over the past 10 years, PABFX has outperformed PABAX with an annualized return of 3.29%, while PABAX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.55% annualized return.


PABFX

YTD

2.97%

1M

0.95%

6M

-0.79%

1Y

8.54%

5Y*

3.84%

10Y*

3.29%

PABAX

YTD

3.34%

1M

0.99%

6M

-2.96%

1Y

7.40%

5Y*

2.87%

10Y*

2.55%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


PABFX vs. PABAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PABFX has a 0.78% expense ratio, which is lower than PABAX's 0.94% expense ratio.


PABAX
Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Balanced Fund
Expense ratio chart for PABAX: current value at 0.94% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.94%
Expense ratio chart for PABFX: current value at 0.78% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.78%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

PABFX vs. PABAX — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PABFX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of PABFX is 4646
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of PABFX is 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of PABFX is 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of PABFX is 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of PABFX is 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of PABFX is 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

PABAX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of PABAX is 2828
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of PABAX is 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of PABAX is 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of PABAX is 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of PABAX is 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of PABAX is 2424
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

PABFX vs. PABAX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Balanced Fund (PABFX) and Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Balanced Fund (PABAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for PABFX, currently valued at 0.87, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.004.000.870.54
The chart of Sortino ratio for PABFX, currently valued at 1.15, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.001.150.67
The chart of Omega ratio for PABFX, currently valued at 1.17, compared to the broader market1.002.003.004.001.171.15
The chart of Calmar ratio for PABFX, currently valued at 0.87, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.0020.000.870.50
The chart of Martin ratio for PABFX, currently valued at 2.80, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.002.801.66
PABFX
PABAX

The current PABFX Sharpe Ratio is 0.87, which is higher than the PABAX Sharpe Ratio of 0.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PABFX and PABAX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.001.002.003.004.00SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
0.87
0.54
PABFX
PABAX

Dividends

PABFX vs. PABAX - Dividend Comparison

PABFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.49%, more than PABAX's 2.36% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
PABFX
PGIM Balanced Fund
2.49%2.57%2.35%2.10%1.74%1.46%1.72%1.87%1.44%1.82%1.59%1.63%
PABAX
Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Balanced Fund
2.36%2.44%1.63%1.42%1.02%1.35%1.81%1.90%1.42%1.50%1.56%6.65%

Drawdowns

PABFX vs. PABAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PABFX drawdown since its inception was -45.40%, roughly equal to the maximum PABAX drawdown of -44.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PABFX and PABAX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-12.00%-10.00%-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-5.16%
-8.31%
PABFX
PABAX

Volatility

PABFX vs. PABAX - Volatility Comparison

PGIM Balanced Fund (PABFX) and Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Balanced Fund (PABAX) have volatilities of 1.97% and 2.03%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
1.97%
2.03%
PABFX
PABAX
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab