PTRQX vs. WACPX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

PTRQX (PGIM Total Return Bond R6) and WACPX (Western Asset Core Plus Bond Fund Class I) are both mutual funds - PTRQX is a Intermediate Core-Plus Bond fund managed by PGIM, while WACPX is a Total Bond Market fund managed by Franklin Templeton. Over the past 10 years, PTRQX returned 2.51%/yr vs 1.76%/yr for WACPX. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. PTRQX charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for WACPX.

Performance

PTRQX vs. WACPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM Total Return Bond R6 (PTRQX) and Western Asset Core Plus Bond Fund Class I (WACPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PTRQX achieves a 0.43% return, which is significantly higher than WACPX's -0.08% return. Over the past 10 years, PTRQX has outperformed WACPX with an annualized return of 2.51%, while WACPX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.76% annualized return.

PTRQX

• 1D: -0.25%
• 1M: 0.75%
• YTD: 0.43%
• 6M: 0.90%
• 1Y: 5.11%
• 3Y*: 5.32%
• 5Y*: 0.77%
• 10Y*: 2.51%

WACPX

• 1D: -0.33%
• 1M: 0.63%
• YTD: -0.08%
• 6M: 0.44%
• 1Y: 4.39%
• 3Y*: 3.58%
• 5Y*: -1.27%
• 10Y*: 1.76%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PTRQX vs. WACPX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PTRQX PGIM Total Return Bond R6	0.43%	7.81%	3.06%	7.80%	-14.30%	-1.37%	8.13%	10.85%	-0.73%	6.67%
WACPX Western Asset Core Plus Bond Fund Class I	-0.08%	7.99%	-0.77%	7.51%	-18.79%	-2.24%	9.42%	12.29%	-1.47%	7.10%

Correlation

The correlation between PTRQX and WACPX is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.96
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.97
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.95
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.93
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2011	0.92

The correlation between PTRQX and WACPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

PTRQX vs. WACPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PTRQX

PTRQX Risk / Return Rank: 24
PTRQX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 23
PTRQX Sortino Ratio Rank: 25
PTRQX Omega Ratio Rank: 23
PTRQX Calmar Ratio Rank: 25
PTRQX Martin Ratio Rank: 22

WACPX

WACPX Risk / Return Rank: 16
WACPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 17
WACPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 18
WACPX Omega Ratio Rank: 16
WACPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 15
WACPX Martin Ratio Rank: 15

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PTRQX vs. WACPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Total Return Bond R6 (PTRQX) and Western Asset Core Plus Bond Fund Class I (WACPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PTRQX	WACPX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.28	1.09	+0.19
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.95	1.64	+0.31
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.23	1.19	+0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.75	1.29	+0.46
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.04	3.76	+1.28

PTRQX vs. WACPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PTRQX Sharpe Ratio is 1.28, which is comparable to the WACPX Sharpe Ratio of 1.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PTRQX and WACPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PTRQX vs. WACPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PTRQX drawdown since its inception was -20.72%, smaller than the maximum WACPX drawdown of -25.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PTRQX and WACPX.

Drawdown Indicators

	PTRQX	WACPX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-20.72%	-25.86%	+5.14%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.08%	-3.60%	+0.52%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-5.47%	-9.55%	+4.08%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-20.69%	-25.46%	+4.77%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-20.72%	-25.86%	+5.14%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.59%	-8.62%	+7.03%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.28%	-3.62%	+0.34%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.07%	1.23%	-0.16%

Volatility

PTRQX vs. WACPX - Volatility Comparison

PGIM Total Return Bond R6 (PTRQX) has a higher volatility of 1.82% compared to Western Asset Core Plus Bond Fund Class I (WACPX) at 1.30%. This indicates that PTRQX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WACPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PTRQX	WACPX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.82%	1.30%	+0.52%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.27%	3.20%	+0.07%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.21%	4.27%	-0.06%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.02%	7.41%	-1.39%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.26%	6.18%	-0.92%

PTRQX vs. WACPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PTRQX has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than WACPX's 0.45% expense ratio.

Dividends

PTRQX vs. WACPX - Dividend Comparison

PTRQX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.68%, less than WACPX's 4.80% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PTRQX PGIM Total Return Bond R6	4.68%	4.63%	4.89%	4.70%	5.83%	2.82%	3.05%	6.95%	3.99%	2.93%	4.01%	3.11%
WACPX Western Asset Core Plus Bond Fund Class I	4.80%	4.70%	4.80%	4.88%	3.46%	2.99%	4.12%	4.98%	4.01%	3.30%	4.77%	3.19%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PTRQX and WACPX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.96, PTRQX and WACPX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, PTRQX or WACPX?

PTRQX has higher volatility (1.82%) compared to WACPX (1.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PTRQX dropped -20.72% vs WACPX's -25.86%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PTRQX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.28 vs 1.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.