PABAX vs. PNOPX
Compare and contrast key facts about Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Balanced Fund (PABAX) and Putnam Sustainable Leaders Fund (PNOPX).
PABAX is managed by Putnam. It was launched on Feb 6, 1994. PNOPX is managed by Putnam. It was launched on Aug 31, 1990.
Performance
PABAX vs. PNOPX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PABAX vs. PNOPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PABAX Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Balanced Fund | -1.48% | 14.90% | 15.25% | 15.80% | -15.76% | 13.25% | 11.81% | 17.31% | -7.21% | 15.21% |
PNOPX Putnam Sustainable Leaders Fund | -9.32% | 10.93% | 22.97% | 26.23% | -22.86% | 23.44% | 28.57% | 35.86% | -0.90% | 29.07% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PABAX achieves a -1.48% return, which is significantly higher than PNOPX's -9.32% return. Over the past 10 years, PABAX has underperformed PNOPX with an annualized return of 8.00%, while PNOPX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.72% annualized return.
PABAX
- 1D
- 1.90%
- 1M
- -3.48%
- YTD
- -1.48%
- 6M
- 0.59%
- 1Y
- 13.86%
- 3Y*
- 12.85%
- 5Y*
- 6.77%
- 10Y*
- 8.00%
PNOPX
- 1D
- 2.73%
- 1M
- -5.88%
- YTD
- -9.32%
- 6M
- -6.62%
- 1Y
- 8.72%
- 3Y*
- 13.65%
- 5Y*
- 6.84%
- 10Y*
- 13.72%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PABAX vs. PNOPX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PABAX has a 0.94% expense ratio, which is lower than PNOPX's 0.99% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
PABAX vs. PNOPX — Risk / Return Rank
PABAX
PNOPX
PABAX vs. PNOPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Balanced Fund (PABAX) and Putnam Sustainable Leaders Fund (PNOPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PABAX | PNOPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.27 | 0.50 | +0.77 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.85 | 0.84 | +1.01 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.12 | +0.15 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.78 | 0.74 | +1.04 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.53 | 2.63 | +5.90 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PABAX | PNOPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.27 | 0.50 | +0.77 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.54 | 0.40 | +0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.68 | 0.76 | -0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.63 | 0.53 | +0.09 |
Correlation
The correlation between PABAX and PNOPX is 0.90, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
PABAX vs. PNOPX - Dividend Comparison
PABAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.82%, less than PNOPX's 12.37% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PABAX Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Balanced Fund | 6.82% | 7.60% | 10.79% | 1.63% | 6.10% | 11.51% | 1.35% | 1.81% | 8.72% | 6.15% | 2.39% | 7.06% |
PNOPX Putnam Sustainable Leaders Fund | 12.37% | 11.22% | 9.25% | 2.96% | 8.38% | 11.69% | 7.41% | 7.14% | 20.24% | 4.91% | 0.00% | 12.64% |
Drawdowns
PABAX vs. PNOPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PABAX drawdown since its inception was -45.92%, smaller than the maximum PNOPX drawdown of -74.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PABAX and PNOPX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PABAX | PNOPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.92% | -74.15% | +28.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.16% | -13.06% | +4.90% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.98% | -29.13% | +8.15% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -22.31% | -30.29% | +7.98% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.15% | -10.69% | +6.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.70% | -24.14% | +18.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.70% | 3.66% | -1.96% |
Volatility
PABAX vs. PNOPX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Balanced Fund (PABAX) is 3.96%, while Putnam Sustainable Leaders Fund (PNOPX) has a volatility of 5.34%. This indicates that PABAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PNOPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PABAX | PNOPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.96% | 5.34% | -1.38% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.36% | 9.55% | -3.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.28% | 18.23% | -6.95% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.55% | 17.35% | -4.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.78% | 18.13% | -6.35% |