PAB vs. JBND

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

PAB (PGIM Active Aggregate Bond ETF) and JBND (Jpmorgan Active Bond ETF) are both Intermediate Core Bond funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, PAB returned 5.49% vs 5.68% for JBND. With a 0.95 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. PAB charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for JBND.

Performance

PAB vs. JBND - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM Active Aggregate Bond ETF (PAB) and Jpmorgan Active Bond ETF (JBND). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PAB achieves a 0.17% return, which is significantly lower than JBND's 0.22% return.

PAB

• 1D: -0.20%
• 1M: 0.26%
• YTD: 0.17%
• 6M: 0.12%
• 1Y: 5.49%
• 3Y*: 4.45%
• 5Y*: 0.15%
• 10Y*: —

JBND

• 1D: -0.19%
• 1M: 0.27%
• YTD: 0.22%
• 6M: 0.25%
• 1Y: 5.68%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PAB vs. JBND - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
PAB PGIM Active Aggregate Bond ETF	0.17%	7.55%	1.89%	7.75%
JBND Jpmorgan Active Bond ETF	0.22%	8.21%	3.19%	7.76%

Correlation

The correlation between PAB and JBND is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.93
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 13, 2023	0.95

The correlation between PAB and JBND has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

PAB vs. JBND - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	PAB	JBND
Financial Services	4.3%	9.0%
Basic Materials	-	0.8%
Communication Services	-	25.7%
Consumer Cyclical	-	0.3%
Consumer Defensive	-	0.1%
Energy	-	0.6%
Healthcare	-	3.1%
Industrials	-	0.5%
Real Estate	-	2.6%
Technology	-	19.7%
Utilities	-	0.7%

Return for Risk

PAB vs. JBND — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PAB

PAB Risk / Return Rank: 40
PAB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 41
PAB Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
PAB Omega Ratio Rank: 39
PAB Calmar Ratio Rank: 39
PAB Martin Ratio Rank: 38

JBND

JBND Risk / Return Rank: 40
JBND Sharpe Ratio Rank: 41
JBND Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
JBND Omega Ratio Rank: 39
JBND Calmar Ratio Rank: 39
JBND Martin Ratio Rank: 37

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PAB vs. JBND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Active Aggregate Bond ETF (PAB) and Jpmorgan Active Bond ETF (JBND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PAB	JBND	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.42	1.49	-0.07
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.14	2.23	-0.09
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	1.26	-0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.92	1.94	-0.01
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.81	5.97	-0.16
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PAB vs. JBND - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PAB Sharpe Ratio is 1.42, which is comparable to the JBND Sharpe Ratio of 1.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PAB and JBND, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PAB	JBND	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.42	1.49	-0.07
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.02	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.03	1.53	-1.50

Drawdowns

PAB vs. JBND - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PAB drawdown since its inception was -19.27%, which is greater than JBND's maximum drawdown of -4.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PAB and JBND.

Drawdown Indicators

	PAB	JBND	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.27%	-4.48%	-14.79%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.86%	-2.94%	+0.08%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-5.95%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.27%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.70%	-1.74%	+0.04%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.83%	-1.15%	-6.68%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.95%	0.95%	0.00%

Volatility

PAB vs. JBND - Volatility Comparison

PGIM Active Aggregate Bond ETF (PAB) has a higher volatility of 1.35% compared to Jpmorgan Active Bond ETF (JBND) at 1.20%. This indicates that PAB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JBND based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PAB	JBND	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.35%	1.20%	+0.15%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.79%	2.67%	+0.12%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.89%	3.82%	+0.07%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.22%	4.84%	+1.38%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	6.16%	4.84%	+1.32%

PAB vs. JBND - Expense Ratio Comparison

PAB has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than JBND's 0.30% expense ratio.

Dividends

PAB vs. JBND - Dividend Comparison

PAB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.56%, more than JBND's 4.41% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
JBND Jpmorgan Active Bond ETF	4.41%	4.42%	4.58%	1.00%	0.00%	0.00%
PAB PGIM Active Aggregate Bond ETF	4.56%	4.28%	4.25%	3.70%	2.81%	2.34%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PAB and JBND in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.93, PAB and JBND move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, PAB or JBND?

PAB has higher volatility (1.35%) compared to JBND (1.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PAB dropped -19.27% vs JBND's -4.48%.

Which ETF is better, PAB or JBND?

On 1-year performance, JBND leads with 5.68% vs 5.49% for PAB. On fees, PAB is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, JBND has been the lower-risk option at 1.20%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PAB or JBND?

Over the 1-year period, JBND has performed better with a 5.68% return vs 5.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PAB or JBND?

PAB is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for JBND.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PAB or JBND?

PAB has the higher dividend yield at 4.56%, compared with 4.41% for JBND.

What is the main difference between PAB and JBND?

They also come from different issuers: PGIM and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for PAB and 0.30% for JBND.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

JBND currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.49 vs 1.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.