PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PAB vs. BOND
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

PAB vs. BOND - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM Active Aggregate Bond ETF (PAB) and PIMCO Active Bond ETF (BOND). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

PAB vs. BOND - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
PAB
PGIM Active Aggregate Bond ETF
0.07%7.55%1.89%6.37%-14.24%0.90%
BOND
PIMCO Active Bond ETF
-0.02%8.39%2.77%6.48%-14.57%0.91%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PAB achieves a 0.07% return, which is significantly higher than BOND's -0.02% return.


PAB

1D
0.32%
1M
-1.80%
YTD
0.07%
6M
1.20%
1Y
4.75%
3Y*
4.17%
5Y*
10Y*

BOND

1D
0.25%
1M
-2.06%
YTD
-0.02%
6M
1.43%
1Y
5.07%
3Y*
4.76%
5Y*
0.62%
10Y*
2.24%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


PAB vs. BOND - Expense Ratio Comparison

PAB has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than BOND's 0.54% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

PAB vs. BOND — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PAB
PAB Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
PAB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PAB Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
PAB Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
PAB Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
PAB Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank

BOND
BOND Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
BOND Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BOND Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
BOND Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
BOND Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
BOND Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PAB vs. BOND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Active Aggregate Bond ETF (PAB) and PIMCO Active Bond ETF (BOND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PABBONDDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.08

1.08

0.00

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.56

1.51

+0.05

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.20

0.00

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.81

1.58

+0.23

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.47

4.65

+0.82

PAB vs. BOND - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PAB Sharpe Ratio is 1.08, which is comparable to the BOND Sharpe Ratio of 1.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PAB and BOND, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PABBONDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.08

1.08

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.11

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.44

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.03

0.63

-0.60

Correlation

The correlation between PAB and BOND is 0.92, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

PAB vs. BOND - Dividend Comparison

PAB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.74%, less than BOND's 5.18% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PAB
PGIM Active Aggregate Bond ETF
4.74%4.28%4.25%3.70%2.81%2.34%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
BOND
PIMCO Active Bond ETF
5.18%5.11%5.02%4.06%3.44%2.58%2.66%3.38%3.18%2.87%2.85%4.14%

Drawdowns

PAB vs. BOND - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PAB drawdown since its inception was -19.27%, roughly equal to the maximum BOND drawdown of -19.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PAB and BOND.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


PABBONDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.27%

-19.71%

+0.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.81%

-3.29%

+0.48%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.71%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.80%

-2.06%

+0.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.05%

-3.53%

-4.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.93%

1.12%

-0.19%

Volatility

PAB vs. BOND - Volatility Comparison

PGIM Active Aggregate Bond ETF (PAB) and PIMCO Active Bond ETF (BOND) have volatilities of 1.76% and 1.82%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


PABBONDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.76%

1.82%

-0.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.60%

2.70%

-0.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.42%

4.72%

-0.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.22%

5.73%

+0.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.22%

5.07%

+1.15%