PAB vs. BND
Compare and contrast key facts about PGIM Active Aggregate Bond ETF (PAB) and Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND).
PAB and BND are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. PAB is an actively managed fund by PGIM. It was launched on Apr 12, 2021. BND is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Float Adjusted Index. It was launched on Apr 3, 2007.
Performance
PAB vs. BND - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PAB vs. BND - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PAB PGIM Active Aggregate Bond ETF | 0.07% | 7.55% | 1.89% | 6.37% | -14.24% | 0.90% |
BND Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF | 0.05% | 7.08% | 1.38% | 5.65% | -13.11% | 0.74% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PAB achieves a 0.07% return, which is significantly higher than BND's 0.05% return.
PAB
- 1D
- 0.32%
- 1M
- -1.80%
- YTD
- 0.07%
- 6M
- 1.20%
- 1Y
- 4.75%
- 3Y*
- 4.17%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BND
- 1D
- 0.22%
- 1M
- -1.74%
- YTD
- 0.05%
- 6M
- 0.95%
- 1Y
- 4.24%
- 3Y*
- 3.59%
- 5Y*
- 0.24%
- 10Y*
- 1.67%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PAB vs. BND - Expense Ratio Comparison
PAB has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is higher than BND's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
PAB vs. BND — Risk / Return Rank
PAB
BND
PAB vs. BND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Active Aggregate Bond ETF (PAB) and Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PAB | BND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.08 | 0.99 | +0.09 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.56 | 1.41 | +0.15 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.18 | +0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.81 | 1.81 | 0.00 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.47 | 4.98 | +0.49 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PAB | BND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.08 | 0.99 | +0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.04 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.30 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.03 | 0.59 | -0.56 |
Correlation
The correlation between PAB and BND is 0.97, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
PAB vs. BND - Dividend Comparison
PAB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.74%, more than BND's 3.91% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PAB PGIM Active Aggregate Bond ETF | 4.74% | 4.28% | 4.25% | 3.70% | 2.81% | 2.34% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
BND Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF | 3.91% | 3.86% | 3.67% | 3.09% | 2.60% | 2.12% | 2.38% | 2.72% | 2.81% | 2.54% | 2.51% | 2.57% |
Drawdowns
PAB vs. BND - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PAB drawdown since its inception was -19.27%, roughly equal to the maximum BND drawdown of -18.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PAB and BND.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PAB | BND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.27% | -18.58% | -0.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.81% | -2.44% | -0.37% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -17.91% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -18.58% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.80% | -2.58% | +0.78% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.05% | -3.07% | -4.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.93% | 0.89% | +0.04% |
Volatility
PAB vs. BND - Volatility Comparison
PGIM Active Aggregate Bond ETF (PAB) has a higher volatility of 1.76% compared to Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND) at 1.63%. This indicates that PAB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BND based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PAB | BND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.76% | 1.63% | +0.13% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.60% | 2.52% | +0.08% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.42% | 4.30% | +0.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.22% | 6.00% | +0.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.22% | 5.52% | +0.70% |