PAB vs. FSEC

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about PGIM Active Aggregate Bond ETF (PAB) and Fidelity Investment Grade Securitized ETF (FSEC).

PAB and FSEC are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. PAB is an actively managed fund by PGIM. It was launched on Apr 12, 2021. FSEC is an actively managed fund by Fidelity. It was launched on Mar 2, 2021.

Performance

PAB vs. FSEC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM Active Aggregate Bond ETF (PAB) and Fidelity Investment Grade Securitized ETF (FSEC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

PAB vs. FSEC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
PAB PGIM Active Aggregate Bond ETF	0.07%	7.55%	1.89%	6.37%	-14.24%	0.90%
FSEC Fidelity Investment Grade Securitized ETF	0.26%	8.33%	2.40%	5.22%	-12.62%	-0.55%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PAB achieves a 0.07% return, which is significantly lower than FSEC's 0.26% return.

PAB

• 1D: 0.32%
• 1M: -1.80%
• YTD: 0.07%
• 6M: 1.20%
• 1Y: 4.75%
• 3Y*: 4.17%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FSEC

• 1D: -0.11%
• 1M: -1.79%
• YTD: 0.26%
• 6M: 1.94%
• 1Y: 5.28%
• 3Y*: 4.54%
• 5Y*: 0.45%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PAB vs. FSEC - Expense Ratio Comparison

PAB has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than FSEC's 0.36% expense ratio.

FSEC

Fidelity Investment Grade Securitized ETF

PAB

PGIM Active Aggregate Bond ETF

Return for Risk

PAB vs. FSEC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PAB

PAB Risk / Return Rank: 59
PAB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
PAB Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
PAB Omega Ratio Rank: 50
PAB Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
PAB Martin Ratio Rank: 55

FSEC

FSEC Risk / Return Rank: 45
FSEC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 46
FSEC Sortino Ratio Rank: 45
FSEC Omega Ratio Rank: 42
FSEC Calmar Ratio Rank: 53
FSEC Martin Ratio Rank: 39

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PAB vs. FSEC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Active Aggregate Bond ETF (PAB) and Fidelity Investment Grade Securitized ETF (FSEC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PAB	FSEC	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.08	0.83	+0.25
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.56	1.20	+0.36
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.19	1.16	+0.03
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.81	1.31	+0.50
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	5.47	3.57	+1.90
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PAB vs. FSEC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PAB Sharpe Ratio is 1.08, which is higher than the FSEC Sharpe Ratio of 0.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PAB and FSEC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PAB	FSEC	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.08	0.83	+0.25
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.07	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.03	0.05	-0.02

Correlation

The correlation between PAB and FSEC is 0.80, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

PAB vs. FSEC - Dividend Comparison

PAB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.74%, more than FSEC's 4.43% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
PAB PGIM Active Aggregate Bond ETF	4.74%	4.28%	4.25%	3.70%	2.81%	2.34%
FSEC Fidelity Investment Grade Securitized ETF	4.43%	4.22%	3.22%	3.41%	2.21%	0.96%

Drawdowns

PAB vs. FSEC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PAB drawdown since its inception was -19.27%, which is greater than FSEC's maximum drawdown of -17.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PAB and FSEC.

Drawdown Indicators

	PAB	FSEC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.27%	-17.97%	-1.30%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.81%	-4.08%	+1.27%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-17.97%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.80%	-1.79%	-0.01%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.05%	-6.82%	-1.23%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.93%	1.50%	-0.57%

Volatility

PAB vs. FSEC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PGIM Active Aggregate Bond ETF (PAB) is 1.76%, while Fidelity Investment Grade Securitized ETF (FSEC) has a volatility of 1.92%. This indicates that PAB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FSEC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PAB	FSEC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.76%	1.92%	-0.16%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.60%	3.38%	-0.78%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.42%	6.42%	-2.00%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.22%	6.72%	-0.50%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	6.22%	6.68%	-0.46%