FSEC vs. JBND
FSEC (Fidelity Investment Grade Securitized ETF) and JBND (Jpmorgan Active Bond ETF) are both Intermediate Core Bond funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, FSEC returned 6.18% vs 4.98% for JBND. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FSEC charges 0.36%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for JBND.
Performance
FSEC vs. JBND - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FSEC achieves a 0.86% return, which is significantly higher than JBND's 0.35% return.
FSEC
- 1D
- -0.18%
- 1M
- 0.41%
- YTD
- 0.86%
- 6M
- 0.87%
- 1Y
- 6.18%
- 3Y*
- 4.82%
- 5Y*
- 0.54%
- 10Y*
- —
JBND
- 1D
- -0.22%
- 1M
- 0.51%
- YTD
- 0.35%
- 6M
- 0.51%
- 1Y
- 4.98%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FSEC vs. JBND - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
FSEC Fidelity Investment Grade Securitized ETF | 0.86% | 8.33% | 2.40% | 7.20% |
JBND Jpmorgan Active Bond ETF | 0.35% | 8.21% | 3.19% | 7.43% |
Correlation
The correlation between FSEC and JBND is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 12, 2023 | 0.82 |
The correlation between FSEC and JBND has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FSEC vs. JBND — Risk / Return Rank
FSEC
JBND
FSEC vs. JBND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Investment Grade Securitized ETF (FSEC) and Jpmorgan Active Bond ETF (JBND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FSEC | JBND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.15 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.20 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.23 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.46 | 1.70 | +0.76 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.72 | 4.89 | +1.83 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FSEC vs. JBND - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FSEC drawdown since its inception was -17.97%, which is greater than JBND's maximum drawdown of -4.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSEC and JBND.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FSEC | JBND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.97% | -4.48% | -13.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.52% | -2.94% | +0.42% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -7.32% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.97% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.20% | -1.62% | +0.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.58% | -1.16% | -5.42% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.92% | 1.02% | -0.10% |
Volatility
FSEC vs. JBND - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Investment Grade Securitized ETF (FSEC) has a higher volatility of 1.27% compared to Jpmorgan Active Bond ETF (JBND) at 1.09%. This indicates that FSEC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JBND based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FSEC | JBND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.27% | 1.09% | +0.18% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.26% | 2.78% | +0.48% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.30% | 3.78% | +1.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.78% | 4.83% | +1.95% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.60% | 4.83% | +1.77% |
FSEC vs. JBND - Expense Ratio Comparison
FSEC has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is higher than JBND's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
FSEC vs. JBND - Dividend Comparison
FSEC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.44%, which matches JBND's 4.40% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSEC Fidelity Investment Grade Securitized ETF | 4.44% | 4.22% | 3.22% | 3.41% | 2.21% | 0.96% |
JBND Jpmorgan Active Bond ETF | 4.40% | 4.42% | 4.58% | 1.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FSEC and JBND have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FSEC has higher volatility (1.27%) compared to JBND (1.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSEC dropped -17.97% vs JBND's -4.48%.
On 1-year performance, FSEC leads with 6.18% vs 4.98% for JBND. On fees, JBND is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, JBND has been the lower-risk option at 1.09%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, FSEC has performed better with a 6.18% return vs 4.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
JBND is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.36% for FSEC.
FSEC has the higher dividend yield at 4.44%, compared with 4.40% for JBND.
They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.36% for FSEC and 0.30% for JBND.
JBND currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.33 vs 1.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FSEC and JBND
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer