PAAA vs. AAAC

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

PAAA (PGIM AAA CLO ETF) and AAAC (Columbia AAA CLO ETF) are both CLO funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.18 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PAAA charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for AAAC.

Performance

PAAA vs. AAAC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM AAA CLO ETF (PAAA) and Columbia AAA CLO ETF (AAAC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with PAAA having a 2.03% return and AAAC slightly higher at 2.06%.

PAAA

• 1D: -0.01%
• 1M: 0.40%
• YTD: 2.03%
• 6M: 2.45%
• 1Y: 5.26%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

AAAC

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.35%
• YTD: 2.06%
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PAAA vs. AAAC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
PAAA PGIM AAA CLO ETF	2.03%	0.29%
AAAC Columbia AAA CLO ETF	2.06%	0.20%

Correlation

The correlation between PAAA and AAAC is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 12, 2025	0.18

Return for Risk

PAAA vs. AAAC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PAAA

PAAA Risk / Return Rank: 99
PAAA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
PAAA Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
PAAA Omega Ratio Rank: 100
PAAA Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
PAAA Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PAAA vs. AAAC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM AAA CLO ETF (PAAA) and Columbia AAA CLO ETF (AAAC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PAAA	AAAC	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	10.83	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	21.80	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	6.72	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	30.32	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	187.65	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PAAA	AAAC	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.83	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	6.78	5.56	+1.22

Drawdowns

PAAA vs. AAAC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PAAA drawdown since its inception was -1.04%, which is greater than AAAC's maximum drawdown of -0.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PAAA and AAAC.

Drawdown Indicators

	PAAA	AAAC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-1.04%	-0.55%	-0.49%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-0.17%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.01%	0.00%	-0.01%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.02%	-0.04%	+0.02%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.03%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	PAAA	AAAC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.11%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	0.36%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.49%	0.89%	-0.40%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	0.98%	0.89%	+0.09%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	0.98%	0.89%	+0.09%

PAAA vs. AAAC - Expense Ratio Comparison

PAAA has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than AAAC's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

PAAA vs. AAAC - Dividend Comparison

PAAA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.88%, more than AAAC's 2.27% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
AAAC Columbia AAA CLO ETF	2.27%	0.03%	0.00%	0.00%
PAAA PGIM AAA CLO ETF	4.88%	5.12%	5.88%	2.76%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PAAA and AAAC in my portfolio?

PAAA and AAAC have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, PAAA or AAAC?

On fees, PAAA is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, PAAA or AAAC?

PAAA is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for AAAC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PAAA or AAAC?

PAAA has the higher dividend yield at 4.88%, compared with 2.27% for AAAC.

What is the main difference between PAAA and AAAC?

They also come from different issuers: PGIM and Columbia Threadneedle. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for PAAA and 0.20% for AAAC.