PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CRCT vs. ANET
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CRCT vs. ANET - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cricut, Inc. (CRCT) and Arista Networks, Inc. (ANET). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CRCT achieves a -14.44% return, which is significantly lower than ANET's 33.81% return.


CRCT

1D
-5.47%
1M
-3.71%
YTD
-14.44%
6M
-13.21%
1Y
-24.15%
3Y*
-17.24%
5Y*
-29.88%
10Y*

ANET

1D
2.72%
1M
1.52%
YTD
33.81%
6M
37.82%
1Y
95.29%
3Y*
62.81%
5Y*
52.17%
10Y*
43.63%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CRCT vs. ANET - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
CRCT
Cricut, Inc.
-14.44%7.53%-6.79%-20.13%-58.04%24.10%
ANET
Arista Networks, Inc.
33.81%18.55%87.73%94.07%-15.58%96.92%

Correlation

The correlation between CRCT and ANET is 0.10, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.10

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.15

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.19

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 26, 2021

0.18

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CRCT:

$882.07M

ANET:

$223.34B

EPS

CRCT:

$0.34

ANET:

$2.92

PE Ratio

CRCT:

12.16

ANET:

60.05

PS Ratio

CRCT:

1.26

ANET:

23.01

PB Ratio

CRCT:

2.47

ANET:

16.56

Total Revenue (TTM)

CRCT:

$705.62M

ANET:

$9.71B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CRCT:

$384.78M

ANET:

$6.17B

EBITDA (TTM)

CRCT:

$108.59M

ANET:

$4.21B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CRCT vs. ANET — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CRCT
CRCT Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
CRCT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CRCT Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
CRCT Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
CRCT Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
CRCT Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank

ANET
ANET Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
ANET Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ANET Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
ANET Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
ANET Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
ANET Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CRCT vs. ANET - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cricut, Inc. (CRCT) and Arista Networks, Inc. (ANET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CRCTANETDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.58

1.81

-2.39

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.62

2.34

-2.97

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.92

1.30

-0.38

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.47

3.61

-4.08

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.77

7.60

-8.36

CRCT vs. ANET - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CRCT Sharpe Ratio is -0.58, which is lower than the ANET Sharpe Ratio of 1.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CRCT and ANET, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CRCTANETDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.58

1.81

-2.39

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.46

1.12

-1.58

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.98

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.27

0.86

-1.13

Drawdowns

CRCT vs. ANET - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CRCT drawdown since its inception was -87.89%, which is greater than ANET's maximum drawdown of -52.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRCT and ANET.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CRCTANETDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-87.89%

-52.20%

-35.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-44.20%

-28.33%

-15.87%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-70.72%

-50.42%

-20.30%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-87.89%

-50.42%

-37.47%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-52.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-85.09%

-1.35%

-83.74%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-70.92%

-15.41%

-55.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

27.14%

13.47%

+13.67%

Volatility

CRCT vs. ANET - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Cricut, Inc. (CRCT) is 15.24%, while Arista Networks, Inc. (ANET) has a volatility of 21.09%. This indicates that CRCT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ANET based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CRCTANETDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.24%

21.09%

-5.85%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

26.78%

39.41%

-12.63%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

42.22%

52.97%

-10.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

64.58%

47.05%

+17.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

66.13%

44.90%

+21.23%

Dividends

CRCT vs. ANET - Dividend Comparison

CRCT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 22.89%, while ANET has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023
ANET
Arista Networks, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
CRCT
Cricut, Inc.
22.89%27.27%7.02%20.49%

Financials

CRCT vs. ANET - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cricut, Inc. and Arista Networks, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00M1.00B1.50B2.00B2.50B20222023202420252026
159.47M
2.71B
(CRCT) Total Revenue
(ANET) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

CRCT vs. ANET - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Cricut, Inc. and Arista Networks, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%20222023202420252026
58.1%
61.9%
Portfolio components
CRCT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cricut, Inc. reported a gross profit of 92.70M and revenue of 159.47M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 58.1%.

ANET - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Arista Networks, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.68B and revenue of 2.71B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 61.9%.

CRCT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cricut, Inc. reported an operating income of 22.89M and revenue of 159.47M, resulting in an operating margin of 14.4%.

ANET - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Arista Networks, Inc. reported an operating income of 1.16B and revenue of 2.71B, resulting in an operating margin of 42.7%.

CRCT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cricut, Inc. reported a net income of 20.32M and revenue of 159.47M, resulting in a net margin of 12.7%.

ANET - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Arista Networks, Inc. reported a net income of 1.02B and revenue of 2.71B, resulting in a net margin of 37.8%.


Frequently Asked Questions


CRCT and ANET have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ANET has higher volatility (21.09%) compared to CRCT (15.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CRCT dropped -87.89% vs ANET's -52.20%.

ANET currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.81 vs -0.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CRCT and ANET

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer