OWNS vs. IBTF
OWNS (CCM Affordable Housing MBS ETF) and IBTF (iShares iBonds Dec 2025 Term Treasury ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - OWNS is a Mortgage Backed Securities fund actively managed by CCM, while IBTF is a Government Bonds fund tracking the ICE 2025 Maturity US Treasury Index. OWNS is actively managed, while IBTF is passively managed. Over the past year, OWNS returned 6.23% vs 2.10% for IBTF. At a 0.22 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. OWNS charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for IBTF.
Performance
OWNS vs. IBTF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
OWNS
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- 0.12%
- YTD
- 0.36%
- 6M
- 0.78%
- 1Y
- 6.23%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IBTF
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- 0.00%
- 6M
- 0.09%
- 1Y
- 2.10%
- 3Y*
- 3.66%
- 5Y*
- 0.90%
- 10Y*
- —
OWNS vs. IBTF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
OWNS CCM Affordable Housing MBS ETF | 0.36% | 7.75% | 3.84% |
IBTF iShares iBonds Dec 2025 Term Treasury ETF | 0.00% | 3.81% | 4.29% |
Correlation
The correlation between OWNS and IBTF is -0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.05 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 19, 2024 | 0.22 |
The correlation between OWNS and IBTF shifts across timeframes, from -0.05 (1 year) to 0.22 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
OWNS vs. IBTF — Risk / Return Rank
OWNS
IBTF
OWNS vs. IBTF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CCM Affordable Housing MBS ETF (OWNS) and iShares iBonds Dec 2025 Term Treasury ETF (IBTF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| OWNS | IBTF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -5.57 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -17.62 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 6.12 | -4.87 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.06 | 58.19 | -56.12 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.99 | 264.16 | -258.17 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| OWNS | IBTF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.39 | 6.96 | -5.57 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.39 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.00 | 0.44 | +0.56 |
Drawdowns
OWNS vs. IBTF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OWNS drawdown since its inception was -5.39%, smaller than the maximum IBTF drawdown of -10.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OWNS and IBTF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| OWNS | IBTF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -5.39% | -10.45% | +5.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.03% | -0.04% | -2.99% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -0.67% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -9.53% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.67% | 0.00% | -1.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.55% | -3.32% | +1.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.04% | 0.01% | +1.03% |
Volatility
OWNS vs. IBTF - Volatility Comparison
CCM Affordable Housing MBS ETF (OWNS) has a higher volatility of 1.46% compared to iShares iBonds Dec 2025 Term Treasury ETF (IBTF) at 0.00%. This indicates that OWNS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBTF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| OWNS | IBTF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.46% | 0.00% | +1.46% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.06% | 0.18% | +2.88% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.55% | 0.36% | +4.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.39% | 2.38% | +3.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.39% | 2.56% | +2.83% |
OWNS vs. IBTF - Expense Ratio Comparison
OWNS has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than IBTF's 0.07% expense ratio.
Dividends
OWNS vs. IBTF - Dividend Comparison
OWNS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.31%, more than IBTF's 2.08% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBTF iShares iBonds Dec 2025 Term Treasury ETF | 2.08% | 3.83% | 4.32% | 4.03% | 1.93% | 0.57% | 0.59% |
OWNS CCM Affordable Housing MBS ETF | 4.31% | 4.12% | 3.75% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
OWNS and IBTF have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
OWNS has higher volatility (1.46%) compared to IBTF (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OWNS dropped -5.39% vs IBTF's -10.45%.
On 1-year performance, OWNS leads with 6.23% vs 2.10% for IBTF. On fees, IBTF is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, IBTF has been the lower-risk option at 0.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, OWNS has performed better with a 6.23% return vs 2.10%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IBTF is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for OWNS.
OWNS has the higher dividend yield at 4.31%, compared with 2.08% for IBTF.
OWNS is categorized as Mortgage Backed Securities, while IBTF is Government Bonds. They also come from different issuers: CCM and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for OWNS and 0.07% for IBTF.
IBTF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.96 vs 1.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for OWNS and IBTF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer