PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
OWLT vs. TRTN-PA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

OWLT vs. TRTN-PA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Owlet, Inc. (OWLT) and Triton International Ltd (TRTN-PA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OWLT achieves a -65.41% return, which is significantly lower than TRTN-PA's 3.95% return.


OWLT

1D
6.06%
1M
-3.28%
YTD
-65.41%
6M
-63.33%
1Y
-23.81%
3Y*
5.12%
5Y*
-47.44%
10Y*

TRTN-PA

1D
0.05%
1M
0.12%
YTD
3.95%
6M
4.96%
1Y
10.11%
3Y*
8.90%
5Y*
6.37%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OWLT vs. TRTN-PA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
OWLT
Owlet, Inc.
-65.41%263.82%-15.72%-32.54%-79.06%-73.75%3.78%
TRTN-PA
Triton International Ltd
3.95%9.17%10.10%8.47%-0.37%8.71%5.66%

Correlation

The correlation between OWLT and TRTN-PA is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.08

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.03

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.03

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 5, 2020

0.03

Fundamentals

Market Cap

OWLT:

$20.35B

TRTN-PA:

$2.58B

EPS

OWLT:

-$0.04

TRTN-PA:

$4.65

PS Ratio

OWLT:

55.28

TRTN-PA:

1.92

PB Ratio

OWLT:

1.37K

TRTN-PA:

1.62

Total Revenue (TTM)

OWLT:

$107.06M

TRTN-PA:

$1.35B

Gross Profit (TTM)

OWLT:

$54.38M

TRTN-PA:

$872.64M

EBITDA (TTM)

OWLT:

-$17.58M

TRTN-PA:

$1.11B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

OWLT vs. TRTN-PA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OWLT
OWLT Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
OWLT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OWLT Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
OWLT Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
OWLT Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
OWLT Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank

TRTN-PA
TRTN-PA Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
TRTN-PA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TRTN-PA Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
TRTN-PA Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
TRTN-PA Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
TRTN-PA Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OWLT vs. TRTN-PA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Owlet, Inc. (OWLT) and Triton International Ltd (TRTN-PA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


OWLTTRTN-PADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.65

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.71

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.03

1.26

-0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.33

3.46

-3.79

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.60

13.05

-13.65

OWLT vs. TRTN-PA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OWLT Sharpe Ratio is -0.28, which is lower than the TRTN-PA Sharpe Ratio of 1.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OWLT and TRTN-PA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

OWLT vs. TRTN-PA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OWLT drawdown since its inception was -98.14%, which is greater than TRTN-PA's maximum drawdown of -57.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OWLT and TRTN-PA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


OWLTTRTN-PADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-98.14%

-57.11%

-41.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-73.12%

-2.93%

-70.19%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-73.12%

-2.94%

-70.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-98.06%

-7.48%

-90.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-96.29%

-0.37%

-95.92%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-78.06%

-2.31%

-75.75%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

39.89%

0.78%

+39.11%

Volatility

OWLT vs. TRTN-PA - Volatility Comparison

Owlet, Inc. (OWLT) has a higher volatility of 20.50% compared to Triton International Ltd (TRTN-PA) at 1.77%. This indicates that OWLT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TRTN-PA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


OWLTTRTN-PADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

20.50%

1.77%

+18.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

69.56%

5.20%

+64.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

86.73%

7.40%

+79.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

90.77%

8.79%

+81.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

85.63%

21.28%

+64.35%

Dividends

OWLT vs. TRTN-PA - Dividend Comparison

OWLT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TRTN-PA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.32%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
OWLT
Owlet, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TRTN-PA
Triton International Ltd
8.32%8.30%8.33%8.45%8.43%7.75%7.81%5.80%

Financials

OWLT vs. TRTN-PA - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Owlet, Inc. and Triton International Ltd. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00100.00M200.00M300.00M400.00M500.00M20222023202420252026
22.50M
331.25M
(OWLT) Total Revenue
(TRTN-PA) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

OWLT vs. TRTN-PA - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Owlet, Inc. and Triton International Ltd over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%20222023202420252026
54.2%
62.5%
Portfolio components
OWLT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Owlet, Inc. reported a gross profit of 12.20M and revenue of 22.50M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 54.2%.

TRTN-PA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Triton International Ltd reported a gross profit of 206.99M and revenue of 331.25M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 62.5%.

OWLT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Owlet, Inc. reported an operating income of -5.60M and revenue of 22.50M, resulting in an operating margin of -24.9%.

TRTN-PA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Triton International Ltd reported an operating income of 180.12M and revenue of 331.25M, resulting in an operating margin of 54.4%.

OWLT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Owlet, Inc. reported a net income of -4.10M and revenue of 22.50M, resulting in a net margin of -18.2%.

TRTN-PA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Triton International Ltd reported a net income of 106.44M and revenue of 331.25M, resulting in a net margin of 32.1%.


Frequently Asked Questions


OWLT and TRTN-PA have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

OWLT has higher volatility (20.50%) compared to TRTN-PA (1.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OWLT dropped -98.14% vs TRTN-PA's -57.11%.

TRTN-PA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.37 vs -0.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for OWLT and TRTN-PA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer