PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
OVLH vs. WNTR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

OVLH vs. WNTR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Overlay Shares Hedged Large Cap Equity ETF (OVLH) and YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (WNTR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OVLH achieves a 4.65% return, which is significantly lower than WNTR's 17.65% return.


OVLH

1D
0.02%
1M
-2.06%
YTD
4.65%
6M
3.65%
1Y
14.04%
3Y*
15.69%
5Y*
8.97%
10Y*

WNTR

1D
6.51%
1M
45.64%
YTD
17.65%
6M
21.49%
1Y
115.98%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OVLH vs. WNTR - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between OVLH and WNTR is -0.48, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.48

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2025

-0.49

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

OVLH vs. WNTR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OVLH
OVLH Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
OVLH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OVLH Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
OVLH Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
OVLH Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
OVLH Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

WNTR
WNTR Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
WNTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WNTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
WNTR Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
WNTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
WNTR Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OVLH vs. WNTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Overlay Shares Hedged Large Cap Equity ETF (OVLH) and YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (WNTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


OVLHWNTRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.62

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.21

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.33

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.22

2.73

-0.52

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.61

6.99

+1.62

OVLH vs. WNTR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OVLH Sharpe Ratio is 1.58, which is comparable to the WNTR Sharpe Ratio of 2.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OVLH and WNTR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

OVLH vs. WNTR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OVLH drawdown since its inception was -20.69%, smaller than the maximum WNTR drawdown of -42.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OVLH and WNTR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


OVLHWNTRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.69%

-42.65%

+21.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.36%

-42.65%

+36.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.57%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.99%

-4.02%

+1.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.99%

-20.87%

+15.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.63%

16.66%

-15.03%

Volatility

OVLH vs. WNTR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Overlay Shares Hedged Large Cap Equity ETF (OVLH) is 3.48%, while YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (WNTR) has a volatility of 18.14%. This indicates that OVLH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WNTR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


OVLHWNTRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.48%

18.14%

-14.66%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.86%

46.41%

-39.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.91%

53.16%

-44.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.78%

53.31%

-41.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.82%

53.31%

-41.49%

OVLH vs. WNTR - Expense Ratio Comparison

OVLH has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is lower than WNTR's 1.01% expense ratio.


Dividends

OVLH vs. WNTR - Dividend Comparison

OVLH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.29%, less than WNTR's 94.34% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
OVLH
Overlay Shares Hedged Large Cap Equity ETF
0.29%0.30%0.32%0.83%0.79%0.40%
WNTR
YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF
94.34%58.56%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


OVLH and WNTR have a correlation of -0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

WNTR has higher volatility (18.14%) compared to OVLH (3.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OVLH dropped -20.69% vs WNTR's -42.65%.

On 1-year performance, WNTR leads with 115.98% vs 14.04% for OVLH. On fees, OVLH is cheaper at 0.80% per year. On volatility, OVLH has been the lower-risk option at 3.48%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, WNTR has performed better with a 115.98% return vs 14.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

OVLH is cheaper with a 0.80% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for WNTR.

WNTR has the higher dividend yield at 94.34%, compared with 0.29% for OVLH.

OVLH is categorized as Equity Hedged, while WNTR is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Liquid Strategies and YieldMax. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for OVLH and 1.01% for WNTR.

WNTR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.20 vs 1.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for OVLH and WNTR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer