OVLH vs. QGRD
OVLH (Overlay Shares Hedged Large Cap Equity ETF) and QGRD (Horizon NASDAQ-100 Defined Risk ETF) are both Equity Hedged funds. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. OVLH charges 0.80%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for QGRD.
Performance
OVLH vs. QGRD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, OVLH achieves a 4.90% return, which is significantly lower than QGRD's 11.58% return.
OVLH
- 1D
- -0.97%
- 1M
- -1.38%
- YTD
- 4.90%
- 6M
- 4.28%
- 1Y
- 15.28%
- 3Y*
- 15.44%
- 5Y*
- 9.11%
- 10Y*
- —
QGRD
- 1D
- -2.62%
- 1M
- 0.24%
- YTD
- 11.58%
- 6M
- 10.16%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
OVLH vs. QGRD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
OVLH Overlay Shares Hedged Large Cap Equity ETF | 4.90% | 6.66% |
QGRD Horizon NASDAQ-100 Defined Risk ETF | 11.58% | 8.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between OVLH and QGRD is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 10, 2025 | 0.91 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
OVLH vs. QGRD — Risk / Return Rank
OVLH
QGRD
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
OVLH vs. QGRD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Overlay Shares Hedged Large Cap Equity ETF (OVLH) and Horizon NASDAQ-100 Defined Risk ETF (QGRD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| OVLH | QGRD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.41 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.50 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
OVLH vs. QGRD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OVLH drawdown since its inception was -20.69%, which is greater than QGRD's maximum drawdown of -9.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OVLH and QGRD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| OVLH | QGRD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.69% | -9.41% | -11.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.36% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -9.57% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.69% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.75% | -3.17% | +0.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.99% | -2.20% | -2.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.61% | — | — |
Volatility
OVLH vs. QGRD - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| OVLH | QGRD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.54% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.89% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.96% | 14.39% | -5.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.78% | 14.39% | -2.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.83% | 14.39% | -2.56% |
OVLH vs. QGRD - Expense Ratio Comparison
OVLH has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is lower than QGRD's 0.85% expense ratio.
Dividends
OVLH vs. QGRD - Dividend Comparison
OVLH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.29%, less than QGRD's 1.40% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OVLH Overlay Shares Hedged Large Cap Equity ETF | 0.29% | 0.30% | 0.32% | 0.83% | 0.79% | 0.40% |
QGRD Horizon NASDAQ-100 Defined Risk ETF | 1.40% | 1.57% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.91, OVLH and QGRD move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, OVLH is cheaper at 0.80% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
OVLH is cheaper with a 0.80% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for QGRD.
QGRD has the higher dividend yield at 1.40%, compared with 0.29% for OVLH.
They also come from different issuers: Liquid Strategies and Horizon. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for OVLH and 0.85% for QGRD.
Find the right allocation for OVLH and QGRD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer