OVLH vs. QGRD

Last updated Jul 15, 2026

OVLH (Overlay Shares Hedged Large Cap Equity ETF) and QGRD (Horizon NASDAQ-100 Defined Risk ETF) are both Equity Hedged funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, OVLH returned 13.38% vs 21.21% for QGRD. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. OVLH charges 0.80%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for QGRD.

Performance

OVLH vs. QGRD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Overlay Shares Hedged Large Cap Equity ETF (OVLH) and Horizon NASDAQ-100 Defined Risk ETF (QGRD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OVLH achieves a 6.53% return, which is significantly lower than QGRD's 12.03% return.

OVLH

• 1D: 0.31%
• 1M: 0.75%
• 6M: 5.19%
• YTD: 6.53%
• 1Y: 13.38%
• 3Y*: 14.90%
• 5Y*: 8.97%
• 10Y*: —

QGRD

• 1D: 0.84%
• 1M: -0.21%
• 6M: 10.10%
• YTD: 12.03%
• 1Y: 21.21%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OVLH vs. QGRD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
OVLH Overlay Shares Hedged Large Cap Equity ETF	6.53%	6.66%
QGRD Horizon NASDAQ-100 Defined Risk ETF	12.03%	8.15%

Correlation

The correlation between OVLH and QGRD is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.90
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 10, 2025	0.90

The correlation between OVLH and QGRD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

OVLH vs. QGRD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OVLH

OVLH Risk / Return Rank: 55
OVLH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
OVLH Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
OVLH Omega Ratio Rank: 53
OVLH Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
OVLH Martin Ratio Rank: 58

QGRD

QGRD Risk / Return Rank: 52
QGRD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
QGRD Sortino Ratio Rank: 48
QGRD Omega Ratio Rank: 50
QGRD Calmar Ratio Rank: 56
QGRD Martin Ratio Rank: 51

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OVLH vs. QGRD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Overlay Shares Hedged Large Cap Equity ETF (OVLH) and Horizon NASDAQ-100 Defined Risk ETF (QGRD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	OVLH	QGRD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.51	1.45	+0.05
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.16	1.97	+0.19
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	1.26	+0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.11	2.26	-0.15
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.99	6.87	+1.12

OVLH vs. QGRD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OVLH Sharpe Ratio is 1.51, which is comparable to the QGRD Sharpe Ratio of 1.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OVLH and QGRD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

OVLH vs. QGRD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OVLH drawdown since its inception was -20.69%, which is greater than QGRD's maximum drawdown of -9.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OVLH and QGRD.

Drawdown Indicators

	OVLH	QGRD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-20.69%	-9.41%	-11.28%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.36%	-9.41%	+3.05%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-9.57%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-20.69%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.24%	-2.78%	+1.54%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.96%	-2.23%	-2.73%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.68%	3.10%	-1.42%

Volatility

OVLH vs. QGRD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Overlay Shares Hedged Large Cap Equity ETF (OVLH) is 2.76%, while Horizon NASDAQ-100 Defined Risk ETF (QGRD) has a volatility of 6.24%. This indicates that OVLH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QGRD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	OVLH	QGRD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.76%	6.24%	-3.48%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.93%	11.61%	-4.68%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.92%	14.65%	-5.73%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.77%	14.59%	-2.82%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	11.79%	14.59%	-2.80%

OVLH vs. QGRD - Expense Ratio Comparison

OVLH has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is lower than QGRD's 0.85% expense ratio.

Dividends

OVLH vs. QGRD - Dividend Comparison

OVLH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.28%, less than QGRD's 1.40% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
OVLH Overlay Shares Hedged Large Cap Equity ETF	0.28%	0.30%	0.32%	0.83%	0.79%	0.40%
QGRD Horizon NASDAQ-100 Defined Risk ETF	1.40%	1.57%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both OVLH and QGRD in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.90, OVLH and QGRD move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, OVLH or QGRD?

QGRD has higher volatility (6.24%) compared to OVLH (2.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OVLH dropped -20.69% vs QGRD's -9.41%.

Which ETF is better, OVLH or QGRD?

On 1-year performance, QGRD leads with 21.21% vs 13.38% for OVLH. On fees, OVLH is cheaper at 0.80% per year. On volatility, OVLH has been the lower-risk option at 2.76%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, OVLH or QGRD?

Over the 1-year period, QGRD has performed better with a 21.21% return vs 13.38%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, OVLH or QGRD?

OVLH is cheaper with a 0.80% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for QGRD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, OVLH or QGRD?

QGRD has the higher dividend yield at 1.40%, compared with 0.28% for OVLH.

What is the main difference between OVLH and QGRD?

They also come from different issuers: Liquid Strategies and Horizon. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for OVLH and 0.85% for QGRD.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

OVLH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.51 vs 1.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.