OVLH vs. OVM

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

OVLH (Overlay Shares Hedged Large Cap Equity ETF) and OVM (Overlay Shares Municipal Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - OVLH is a Equity Hedged fund actively managed by Liquid Strategies, while OVM is a Municipal Bonds fund actively managed by Liquid Strategies. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, OVLH returned 9.69%/yr vs 1.59%/yr for OVM. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. OVLH charges 0.80%/yr vs 0.82%/yr for OVM.

Performance

OVLH vs. OVM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Overlay Shares Hedged Large Cap Equity ETF (OVLH) and Overlay Shares Municipal Bond ETF (OVM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OVLH achieves a 7.26% return, which is significantly higher than OVM's 3.96% return.

OVLH

• 1D: -0.57%
• 1M: 3.78%
• YTD: 7.26%
• 6M: 6.86%
• 1Y: 18.57%
• 3Y*: 16.81%
• 5Y*: 9.69%
• 10Y*: —

OVM

• 1D: -0.17%
• 1M: 1.10%
• YTD: 3.96%
• 6M: 4.16%
• 1Y: 11.81%
• 3Y*: 5.37%
• 5Y*: 1.59%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OVLH vs. OVM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
OVLH Overlay Shares Hedged Large Cap Equity ETF	7.26%	15.77%	18.44%	16.93%	-16.16%	20.91%
OVM Overlay Shares Municipal Bond ETF	3.96%	4.14%	3.42%	7.35%	-11.26%	3.95%

Correlation

The correlation between OVLH and OVM is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.62
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.58
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.49
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 19, 2021	0.48

The correlation between OVLH and OVM shifts across timeframes, from 0.48 (all time) to 0.62 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

OVLH vs. OVM - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	OVLH	OVM
Technology	35.7%	35.6%
Financial Services	11.6%	11.8%
Communication Services	11.2%	11.2%
Consumer Cyclical	10.2%	10.1%
Healthcare	8.5%	8.5%
Industrials	8.3%	8.3%
Consumer Defensive	4.9%	4.9%
Energy	3.5%	3.5%
Utilities	2.4%	2.4%
Real Estate	1.9%	1.9%
Basic Materials	1.8%	1.8%

Return for Risk

OVLH vs. OVM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OVLH

OVLH Risk / Return Rank: 65
OVLH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
OVLH Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
OVLH Omega Ratio Rank: 64
OVLH Calmar Ratio Rank: 59
OVLH Martin Ratio Rank: 66

OVM

OVM Risk / Return Rank: 88
OVM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
OVM Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
OVM Omega Ratio Rank: 90
OVM Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
OVM Martin Ratio Rank: 87

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OVLH vs. OVM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Overlay Shares Hedged Large Cap Equity ETF (OVLH) and Overlay Shares Municipal Bond ETF (OVM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	OVLH	OVM	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.21	2.85	-0.65
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.17	4.24	-1.06
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.39	1.58	-0.19
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.93	4.86	-1.93
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	12.05	18.92	-6.86
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

OVLH vs. OVM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OVLH Sharpe Ratio is 2.21, which is comparable to the OVM Sharpe Ratio of 2.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OVLH and OVM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	OVLH	OVM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.21	2.85	-0.65
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.83	0.30	+0.54
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.93	0.43	+0.50

Drawdowns

OVLH vs. OVM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OVLH drawdown since its inception was -20.69%, which is greater than OVM's maximum drawdown of -15.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OVLH and OVM.

Drawdown Indicators

	OVLH	OVM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-20.69%	-15.58%	-5.11%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.36%	-2.44%	-3.92%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-9.57%	-8.20%	-1.37%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-20.69%	-15.58%	-5.11%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.57%	-0.17%	-0.40%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.02%	-4.01%	-1.01%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.54%	0.63%	+0.91%

Volatility

OVLH vs. OVM - Volatility Comparison

Overlay Shares Hedged Large Cap Equity ETF (OVLH) has a higher volatility of 2.27% compared to Overlay Shares Municipal Bond ETF (OVM) at 1.26%. This indicates that OVLH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than OVM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	OVLH	OVM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.27%	1.26%	+1.01%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.21%	3.36%	+2.85%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.46%	4.16%	+4.30%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.71%	5.39%	+6.32%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	11.79%	6.55%	+5.24%

OVLH vs. OVM - Expense Ratio Comparison

OVLH has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is lower than OVM's 0.82% expense ratio.

Dividends

OVLH vs. OVM - Dividend Comparison

OVLH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.28%, less than OVM's 6.11% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
OVLH Overlay Shares Hedged Large Cap Equity ETF	0.28%	0.30%	0.32%	0.83%	0.79%	0.40%	0.00%	0.00%
OVM Overlay Shares Municipal Bond ETF	6.11%	5.45%	4.91%	4.66%	4.21%	6.10%	3.97%	0.58%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both OVLH and OVM in my portfolio?

OVLH and OVM have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, OVLH or OVM?

OVLH has higher volatility (2.27%) compared to OVM (1.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OVLH dropped -20.69% vs OVM's -15.58%.

Which ETF is better, OVLH or OVM?

On 5-year performance, OVLH leads with 9.69% vs 1.59% for OVM. On fees, OVLH is cheaper at 0.80% per year. On volatility, OVM has been the lower-risk option at 1.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, OVLH or OVM?

Over the 5-year period, OVLH has performed better with a 9.69% return vs 1.59%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, OVLH or OVM?

OVLH is cheaper with a 0.80% expense ratio, compared with 0.82% for OVM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, OVLH or OVM?

OVM has the higher dividend yield at 6.11%, compared with 0.28% for OVLH.

What is the main difference between OVLH and OVM?

OVLH is categorized as Equity Hedged, while OVM is Municipal Bonds. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for OVLH and 0.82% for OVM.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

OVM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.85 vs 2.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.