PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
OVM vs. OVF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

OVM vs. OVF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Overlay Shares Municipal Bond ETF (OVM) and Overlay Shares Foreign Equity ETF (OVF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OVM achieves a 2.46% return, which is significantly lower than OVF's 14.33% return.


OVM

1D
0.19%
1M
-1.69%
6M
0.80%
YTD
2.46%
1Y
8.01%
3Y*
4.69%
5Y*
0.99%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
2.47%

OVF

1D
0.48%
1M
0.37%
6M
7.11%
YTD
14.33%
1Y
29.76%
3Y*
19.48%
5Y*
9.02%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
9.21%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$899.09K$736.19K$585.89K
$290.25K$299.51K$339.65K

OVM vs. OVF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
OVM
Overlay Shares Municipal Bond ETF
2.46%4.14%3.42%7.35%-11.26%4.22%6.17%1.61%
OVF
Overlay Shares Foreign Equity ETF
14.33%33.03%6.40%15.25%-17.64%9.56%2.65%5.76%

Correlation

The correlation between OVM and OVF is 0.64, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.64

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.56

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.53

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2019

0.49

The correlation between OVM and OVF shifts across timeframes, from 0.48 (all time) to 0.64 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

OVM vs. OVF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

OVM
OVM Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
OVM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OVM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
OVM Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
OVM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
OVM Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

OVF
OVF Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
OVF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OVF Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
OVF Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
OVF Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
OVF Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

OVM vs. OVF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Overlay Shares Municipal Bond ETF (OVM) and Overlay Shares Foreign Equity ETF (OVF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


OVMOVFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.28

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.30

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.79

2.57

+0.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.19

9.57

+0.63

OVM vs. OVF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OVM Sharpe Ratio is 1.76, which is comparable to the OVF Sharpe Ratio of 1.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OVM and OVF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

OVM vs. OVF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OVM drawdown since its inception was -15.58%, smaller than the maximum OVF drawdown of -30.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OVM and OVF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


OVMOVFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.58%

-30.07%

+14.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.88%

-11.64%

+8.76%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.20%

-15.89%

+7.69%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.58%

-30.07%

+14.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.91%

-1.34%

-0.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.94%

-7.32%

+3.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.79%

3.12%

-2.33%

Volatility

OVM vs. OVF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Overlay Shares Municipal Bond ETF (OVM) is 1.74%, while Overlay Shares Foreign Equity ETF (OVF) has a volatility of 6.02%. This indicates that OVM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than OVF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


OVMOVFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.74%

6.02%

-4.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.57%

15.98%

-12.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.57%

18.39%

-13.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.46%

16.21%

-10.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.52%

17.26%

-10.74%

OVM vs. OVF - Expense Ratio Comparison

OVM has a 0.82% expense ratio, which is lower than OVF's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

OVM vs. OVF - Dividend Comparison

OVM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.80%, less than OVF's 9.75% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
OVF
Overlay Shares Foreign Equity ETF
9.75%6.32%5.13%5.17%4.50%4.88%2.55%2.12%
OVM
Overlay Shares Municipal Bond ETF
5.80%5.45%4.91%4.66%4.21%6.10%3.97%0.58%

Frequently Asked Questions


OVM and OVF have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

OVF has higher volatility (6.02%) compared to OVM (1.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OVM dropped -15.58% vs OVF's -30.07%.

On 5-year performance, OVF leads with 9.02% vs 0.99% for OVM. On fees, OVM is cheaper at 0.82% per year. On volatility, OVM has been the lower-risk option at 1.74%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, OVF has performed better with a 9.02% return vs 0.99%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

OVM is cheaper with a 0.82% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for OVF.

OVF has the higher dividend yield at 9.75%, compared with 5.80% for OVM.

OVM is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while OVF is Foreign Large Cap Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.82% for OVM and 0.95% for OVF.

OVM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.76 vs 1.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for OVM and OVF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer