OUSA vs. SEIQ

Last updated Aug 6, 2026

OUSA (OShares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF) and SEIQ (SEI Enhanced US Large Cap Quality Factor ETF) are both Quality Factor funds. OUSA is passively managed, while SEIQ is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, OUSA returned 14.02%/yr vs 14.99%/yr for SEIQ. Their correlation of 0.88 means they have usually moved in the same direction. OUSA charges 0.48%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for SEIQ.

Performance

OUSA vs. SEIQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in OShares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF (OUSA) and SEI Enhanced US Large Cap Quality Factor ETF (SEIQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OUSA achieves a 8.40% return, which is significantly lower than SEIQ's 8.95% return.

OUSA

• 1D: -0.04%
• 1M: 3.76%
• 6M: 4.93%
• YTD: 8.40%
• 1Y: 16.43%
• 3Y*: 14.02%
• 5Y*: 9.17%
• 10Y*: 10.53%
• ALL TIME*: 10.84%

SEIQ

• 1D: 0.36%
• 1M: 4.77%
• 6M: 8.79%
• YTD: 8.95%
• 1Y: 16.00%
• 3Y*: 14.99%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 14.55%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
OUSA OShares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF	$787.13K	$1.27M	$1.35M
SEIQ SEI Enhanced US Large Cap Quality Factor ETF	$1.93M	$2.99M	$2.13M

OUSA vs. SEIQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
OUSA OShares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF	8.40%	10.23%	17.09%	13.44%	-0.65%
SEIQ SEI Enhanced US Large Cap Quality Factor ETF	8.95%	12.51%	16.15%	22.66%	1.51%

Correlation

The correlation between OUSA and SEIQ is 0.82, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.82
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.86
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 18, 2022	0.88

The correlation between OUSA and SEIQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

OUSA vs. SEIQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	OUSA	SEIQ
Technology	23.7%	34.1%
Financial Services	18.6%	10.3%
Healthcare	15.1%	19.4%
Consumer Cyclical	13.1%	10.0%
Industrials	11.9%	6.7%
Communication Services	10.3%	5.3%
Consumer Defensive	7.4%	13.1%
Basic Materials	-	0.9%
Energy	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

OUSA vs. SEIQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

OUSA

OUSA Risk / Return Rank: 56
OUSA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
OUSA Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
OUSA Omega Ratio Rank: 57
OUSA Calmar Ratio Rank: 48
OUSA Martin Ratio Rank: 52

SEIQ

SEIQ Risk / Return Rank: 47
SEIQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 49
SEIQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 49
SEIQ Omega Ratio Rank: 46
SEIQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 41
SEIQ Martin Ratio Rank: 49

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

OUSA vs. SEIQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for OShares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF (OUSA) and SEI Enhanced US Large Cap Quality Factor ETF (SEIQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	OUSA	SEIQ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.62	1.41	+0.21
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.44	2.02	+0.43
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.29	1.25	+0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.97	1.66	+0.31
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.89	6.30	+0.59

OUSA vs. SEIQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OUSA Sharpe Ratio is 1.62, which is comparable to the SEIQ Sharpe Ratio of 1.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OUSA and SEIQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

OUSA vs. SEIQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OUSA drawdown since its inception was -33.12%, which is greater than SEIQ's maximum drawdown of -14.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OUSA and SEIQ.

Drawdown Indicators

	OUSA	SEIQ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.12%	-14.87%	-18.25%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.36%	-9.66%	+1.30%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.14%	-14.27%	+1.13%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.54%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-33.12%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.04%	0.00%	-0.04%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.49%	-2.68%	-0.81%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.39%	2.55%	-0.16%

Volatility

OUSA vs. SEIQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for OShares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF (OUSA) is 3.82%, while SEI Enhanced US Large Cap Quality Factor ETF (SEIQ) has a volatility of 4.18%. This indicates that OUSA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SEIQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	OUSA	SEIQ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.82%	4.18%	-0.36%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.10%	9.25%	-1.15%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.22%	11.50%	-1.28%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.39%	14.58%	-1.19%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.19%	14.58%	+0.61%

OUSA vs. SEIQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

OUSA has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is higher than SEIQ's 0.15% expense ratio.

Dividends

OUSA vs. SEIQ - Dividend Comparison

OUSA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.33%, more than SEIQ's 0.88% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
OUSA OShares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF	1.33%	1.39%	1.50%	1.81%	1.92%	1.56%	2.03%	2.31%	3.06%	2.15%	2.32%	1.17%
SEIQ SEI Enhanced US Large Cap Quality Factor ETF	0.88%	0.94%	0.97%	1.08%	0.83%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both OUSA and SEIQ in my portfolio?

OUSA and SEIQ have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, OUSA or SEIQ?

SEIQ has higher volatility (4.18%) compared to OUSA (3.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OUSA dropped -33.12% vs SEIQ's -14.87%.

Which ETF is better, OUSA or SEIQ?

On 3-year performance, SEIQ leads with 14.99% vs 14.02% for OUSA. On fees, SEIQ is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, OUSA has been the lower-risk option at 3.82%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, OUSA or SEIQ?

Over the 3-year period, SEIQ has performed better with a 14.99% return vs 14.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, OUSA or SEIQ?

SEIQ is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.48% for OUSA.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, OUSA or SEIQ?

OUSA has the higher dividend yield at 1.33%, compared with 0.88% for SEIQ.

What is the main difference between OUSA and SEIQ?

They also come from different issuers: O'Shares Investments and SEI. Their fees differ too: 0.48% for OUSA and 0.15% for SEIQ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

OUSA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.62 vs 1.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.