PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
OUSA vs. NACP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

OUSA vs. NACP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in OShares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF (OUSA) and Impact Shares NAACP Minority Empowerment ETF (NACP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OUSA achieves a 1.05% return, which is significantly lower than NACP's 22.18% return.


OUSA

1D
-0.75%
1M
1.02%
YTD
1.05%
6M
1.29%
1Y
9.81%
3Y*
12.63%
5Y*
8.62%
10Y*
10.22%

NACP

1D
-0.13%
1M
9.92%
YTD
22.18%
6M
20.98%
1Y
43.81%
3Y*
27.18%
5Y*
15.98%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OUSA vs. NACP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
OUSA
OShares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF
1.05%10.23%17.09%13.44%-9.33%23.75%6.96%25.03%-2.96%
NACP
Impact Shares NAACP Minority Empowerment ETF
22.18%21.38%23.93%29.69%-23.05%27.62%26.00%30.74%-8.79%

Correlation

The correlation between OUSA and NACP is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.57

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.72

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 20, 2018

0.78

Over the past year, the correlation between OUSA and NACP has dropped to 0.57 - well below their long-term average of 0.78, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

OUSA vs. NACP - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
OUSA
NACP

Technology

23.4%
35.8%

Financial Services

18.5%
10.6%

Healthcare

14.1%
9.2%

Consumer Cyclical

13.4%
11.1%

Industrials

11.6%
8.7%

Communication Services

11.4%
9.8%

Consumer Defensive

7.6%
3.6%

Basic Materials

-

1.5%

Energy

-

5.0%

Real Estate

-

1.3%

Utilities

-

3.4%

Technology

OUSA
23.4%
NACP
35.8%

Financial Services

OUSA
18.5%
NACP
10.6%

Healthcare

OUSA
14.1%
NACP
9.2%

Consumer Cyclical

OUSA
13.4%
NACP
11.1%

Industrials

OUSA
11.6%
NACP
8.7%

Communication Services

OUSA
11.4%
NACP
9.8%

Consumer Defensive

OUSA
7.6%
NACP
3.6%

Basic Materials

OUSA

-

NACP
1.5%

Energy

OUSA

-

NACP
5.0%

Real Estate

OUSA

-

NACP
1.3%

Utilities

OUSA

-

NACP
3.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

OUSA vs. NACP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OUSA
OUSA Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
OUSA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OUSA Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
OUSA Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
OUSA Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
OUSA Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank

NACP
NACP Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
NACP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NACP Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
NACP Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
NACP Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
NACP Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OUSA vs. NACP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for OShares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF (OUSA) and Impact Shares NAACP Minority Empowerment ETF (NACP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


OUSANACPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.63

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.54

-0.36

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.18

4.56

-3.38

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.19

20.04

-15.85

OUSA vs. NACP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OUSA Sharpe Ratio is 1.01, which is lower than the NACP Sharpe Ratio of 3.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OUSA and NACP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


OUSANACPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.01

3.14

-2.13

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

0.92

-0.27

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.68

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.68

0.93

-0.25

Drawdowns

OUSA vs. NACP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OUSA drawdown since its inception was -33.12%, which is greater than NACP's maximum drawdown of -30.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OUSA and NACP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


OUSANACPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.12%

-30.96%

-2.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.36%

-9.65%

+1.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.14%

-19.66%

+6.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.54%

-27.89%

+8.35%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.58%

-0.13%

-2.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.53%

-5.75%

+2.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.35%

2.19%

+0.16%

Volatility

OUSA vs. NACP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for OShares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF (OUSA) is 2.25%, while Impact Shares NAACP Minority Empowerment ETF (NACP) has a volatility of 4.44%. This indicates that OUSA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NACP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


OUSANACPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.25%

4.44%

-2.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.18%

11.13%

-3.95%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.75%

14.02%

-4.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.30%

17.47%

-4.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.16%

18.70%

-3.54%

OUSA vs. NACP - Expense Ratio Comparison

OUSA has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is lower than NACP's 0.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

OUSA vs. NACP - Dividend Comparison

OUSA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.42%, more than NACP's 0.55% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NACP
Impact Shares NAACP Minority Empowerment ETF
0.55%0.62%2.96%1.28%3.48%3.06%1.48%1.22%0.71%0.00%0.00%0.00%
OUSA
OShares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF
1.42%1.39%1.50%1.81%1.92%1.56%2.03%2.31%3.06%2.15%2.32%1.17%

Frequently Asked Questions


OUSA and NACP have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NACP has higher volatility (4.44%) compared to OUSA (2.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OUSA dropped -33.12% vs NACP's -30.96%.

On 5-year performance, NACP leads with 15.98% vs 8.62% for OUSA. On fees, OUSA is cheaper at 0.48% per year. On volatility, OUSA has been the lower-risk option at 2.25%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, NACP has performed better with a 15.98% return vs 8.62%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

OUSA is cheaper with a 0.48% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for NACP.

OUSA has the higher dividend yield at 1.42%, compared with 0.55% for NACP.

OUSA tracks O'Shares US Quality Dividend Index, while NACP tracks Morningstar Minority Empowerment Index. They also come from different issuers: O'Shares Investments and Impact Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.48% for OUSA and 0.49% for NACP.

NACP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.14 vs 1.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for OUSA and NACP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer