OUSA vs. ILCG

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

OUSA (OShares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF) and ILCG (iShares Morningstar Growth ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds - OUSA tracks the O'Shares US Quality Dividend Index while ILCG tracks the Morningstar US Large-Mid Cap Broad Growth Index Gross. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, OUSA returned 10.22%/yr vs 18.15%/yr for ILCG. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. OUSA charges 0.48%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for ILCG.

Performance

OUSA vs. ILCG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in OShares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF (OUSA) and iShares Morningstar Growth ETF (ILCG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OUSA achieves a 1.05% return, which is significantly lower than ILCG's 14.48% return. Over the past 10 years, OUSA has underperformed ILCG with an annualized return of 10.22%, while ILCG has yielded a comparatively higher 18.15% annualized return.

OUSA

• 1D: -0.75%
• 1M: 1.02%
• YTD: 1.05%
• 6M: 1.29%
• 1Y: 9.81%
• 3Y*: 12.63%
• 5Y*: 8.62%
• 10Y*: 10.22%

ILCG

• 1D: -1.02%
• 1M: 7.68%
• YTD: 14.48%
• 6M: 14.61%
• 1Y: 29.51%
• 3Y*: 26.55%
• 5Y*: 14.95%
• 10Y*: 18.15%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OUSA vs. ILCG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
OUSA OShares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF	1.05%	10.23%	17.09%	13.44%	-9.33%	23.75%	6.96%	25.03%	-3.11%	18.81%
ILCG iShares Morningstar Growth ETF	14.48%	16.71%	32.82%	40.41%	-31.75%	24.33%	38.56%	33.22%	2.06%	30.57%

Correlation

The correlation between OUSA and ILCG is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.42
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.59
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.70
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.72
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2015	0.73

Over the past year, the correlation between OUSA and ILCG has dropped to 0.42 - well below their long-term average of 0.73, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

OUSA vs. ILCG - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	OUSA	ILCG
Technology	23.4%	49.8%
Financial Services	18.5%	6.0%
Healthcare	14.1%	5.3%
Consumer Cyclical	13.4%	10.6%
Industrials	11.6%	8.3%
Communication Services	11.4%	14.5%
Consumer Defensive	7.6%	1.6%
Basic Materials	-	1.1%
Energy	-	0.5%
Real Estate	-	1.4%
Utilities	-	0.8%

Return for Risk

OUSA vs. ILCG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OUSA

OUSA Risk / Return Rank: 27
OUSA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 28
OUSA Sortino Ratio Rank: 28
OUSA Omega Ratio Rank: 26
OUSA Calmar Ratio Rank: 25
OUSA Martin Ratio Rank: 29

ILCG

ILCG Risk / Return Rank: 46
ILCG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 52
ILCG Sortino Ratio Rank: 49
ILCG Omega Ratio Rank: 50
ILCG Calmar Ratio Rank: 38
ILCG Martin Ratio Rank: 41

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OUSA vs. ILCG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for OShares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF (OUSA) and iShares Morningstar Growth ETF (ILCG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	OUSA	ILCG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.01	1.82	-0.81
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.53	2.45	-0.91
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.18	1.32	-0.14
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.18	1.89	-0.72
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.19	6.68	-2.49
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

OUSA vs. ILCG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OUSA Sharpe Ratio is 1.01, which is lower than the ILCG Sharpe Ratio of 1.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OUSA and ILCG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	OUSA	ILCG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.01	1.82	-0.81
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.65	0.68	-0.03
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.68	0.85	-0.17
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.68	0.59	+0.09

Drawdowns

OUSA vs. ILCG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OUSA drawdown since its inception was -33.12%, smaller than the maximum ILCG drawdown of -52.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OUSA and ILCG.

Drawdown Indicators

	OUSA	ILCG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.12%	-52.98%	+19.86%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.36%	-15.65%	+7.29%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.14%	-23.10%	+9.96%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.54%	-35.38%	+15.84%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-33.12%	-35.38%	+2.26%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.58%	-1.02%	-1.56%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.53%	-8.22%	+4.69%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.35%	4.43%	-2.08%

Volatility

OUSA vs. ILCG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for OShares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF (OUSA) is 2.25%, while iShares Morningstar Growth ETF (ILCG) has a volatility of 4.40%. This indicates that OUSA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ILCG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	OUSA	ILCG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.25%	4.40%	-2.15%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.18%	12.81%	-5.63%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.75%	16.31%	-6.56%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.30%	22.00%	-8.70%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.16%	21.53%	-6.37%

OUSA vs. ILCG - Expense Ratio Comparison

OUSA has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is higher than ILCG's 0.04% expense ratio.

Dividends

OUSA vs. ILCG - Dividend Comparison

OUSA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.42%, more than ILCG's 0.40% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ILCG iShares Morningstar Growth ETF	0.40%	0.47%	0.50%	0.69%	0.75%	0.34%	0.28%	0.54%	0.81%	0.89%	0.95%	0.99%
OUSA OShares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF	1.42%	1.39%	1.50%	1.81%	1.92%	1.56%	2.03%	2.31%	3.06%	2.15%	2.32%	1.17%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both OUSA and ILCG in my portfolio?

OUSA and ILCG have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, OUSA or ILCG?

ILCG has higher volatility (4.40%) compared to OUSA (2.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OUSA dropped -33.12% vs ILCG's -52.98%.

Which ETF is better, OUSA or ILCG?

On 10-year performance, ILCG leads with 18.15% vs 10.22% for OUSA. On fees, ILCG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, OUSA has been the lower-risk option at 2.25%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, OUSA or ILCG?

Over the 10-year period, ILCG has performed better with a 18.15% return vs 10.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, OUSA or ILCG?

ILCG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.48% for OUSA.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, OUSA or ILCG?

OUSA has the higher dividend yield at 1.42%, compared with 0.40% for ILCG.

What is the main difference between OUSA and ILCG?

OUSA tracks O'Shares US Quality Dividend Index, while ILCG tracks Morningstar US Large-Mid Cap Broad Growth Index Gross. They also come from different issuers: O'Shares Investments and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.48% for OUSA and 0.04% for ILCG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ILCG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.82 vs 1.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.