OUSA vs. GARP
OUSA (OShares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF) and GARP (iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF) are both Quality Factor funds - OUSA tracks the O'Shares US Quality Dividend Index while GARP tracks the MSCI USA Quality GARP Select Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, OUSA returned 8.87%/yr vs 17.48%/yr for GARP. Their 0.68 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. OUSA charges 0.48%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for GARP.
Performance
OUSA vs. GARP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, OUSA achieves a 6.53% return, which is significantly lower than GARP's 16.89% return.
OUSA
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- 1.87%
- 6M
- 4.63%
- YTD
- 6.53%
- 1Y
- 15.60%
- 3Y*
- 12.64%
- 5Y*
- 8.87%
- 10Y*
- 10.36%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.68%
GARP
- 1D
- 0.66%
- 1M
- -1.22%
- 6M
- 14.45%
- YTD
- 16.89%
- 1Y
- 31.75%
- 3Y*
- 28.85%
- 5Y*
- 17.48%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 20.07%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $25.65M | $25.43M | $23.00M | |
| $914.72K | $1.31M | $1.45M |
OUSA vs. GARP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OUSA OShares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF | 6.53% | 10.23% | 17.09% | 13.44% | -9.33% | 23.75% | 5.49% |
GARP iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF | 16.89% | 21.49% | 37.42% | 42.86% | -26.75% | 27.99% | 26.51% |
Correlation
The correlation between OUSA and GARP is 0.33, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.33 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.56 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.69 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 16, 2020 | 0.68 |
Over the past year, the correlation between OUSA and GARP has dropped to 0.33 - well below their long-term average of 0.68, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
OUSA vs. GARP - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
OUSA
GARP
Technology
Financial Services
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
-
Basic Materials
-
Energy
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Technology
OUSA
GARP
Financial Services
OUSA
GARP
Healthcare
OUSA
GARP
Consumer Cyclical
OUSA
GARP
Industrials
OUSA
GARP
Communication Services
OUSA
GARP
Consumer Defensive
OUSA
GARP
-
Basic Materials
OUSA
-
GARP
Energy
OUSA
-
GARP
Real Estate
OUSA
-
GARP
Utilities
OUSA
-
GARP
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
OUSA vs. GARP — Risk / Return Rank
OUSA
GARP
OUSA vs. GARP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for OShares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF (OUSA) and iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF (GARP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| OUSA | GARP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.05 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.14 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.26 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.78 | 2.19 | -0.41 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.23 | 7.99 | -1.76 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
OUSA vs. GARP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OUSA drawdown since its inception was -33.12%, which is greater than GARP's maximum drawdown of -31.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OUSA and GARP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| OUSA | GARP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.12% | -31.34% | -1.78% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.36% | -13.69% | +5.33% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.14% | -23.73% | +10.59% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.54% | -30.61% | +11.07% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.12% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.75% | -4.34% | +3.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.50% | -7.27% | +3.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.39% | 3.75% | -1.36% |
Volatility
OUSA vs. GARP - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for OShares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF (OUSA) is 4.00%, while iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF (GARP) has a volatility of 5.68%. This indicates that OUSA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GARP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| OUSA | GARP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.00% | 5.68% | -1.68% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.11% | 16.18% | -8.07% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.27% | 20.02% | -9.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.38% | 22.34% | -8.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.19% | 23.92% | -8.73% |
OUSA vs. GARP - Expense Ratio Comparison
OUSA has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is higher than GARP's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
OUSA vs. GARP - Dividend Comparison
OUSA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.36%, more than GARP's 0.27% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GARP iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF | 0.27% | 0.31% | 0.38% | 0.75% | 1.85% | 0.67% | 0.75% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
OUSA OShares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF | 1.36% | 1.39% | 1.50% | 1.81% | 1.92% | 1.56% | 2.03% | 2.31% | 3.06% | 2.15% | 2.32% | 1.17% |
Frequently Asked Questions
OUSA and GARP have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GARP has higher volatility (5.68%) compared to OUSA (4.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OUSA dropped -33.12% vs GARP's -31.34%.
On 5-year performance, GARP leads with 17.48% vs 8.87% for OUSA. On fees, GARP is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, OUSA has been the lower-risk option at 4.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, GARP has performed better with a 17.48% return vs 8.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GARP is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.48% for OUSA.
OUSA has the higher dividend yield at 1.36%, compared with 0.27% for GARP.
OUSA tracks O'Shares US Quality Dividend Index, while GARP tracks MSCI USA Quality GARP Select Index. They also come from different issuers: O'Shares Investments and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.48% for OUSA and 0.15% for GARP.
GARP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.50 vs 1.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for OUSA and GARP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer