OUNZ vs. NLR
OUNZ (VanEck Merk Gold ETF) and NLR (VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - OUNZ is a Gold fund tracking the LBMA Gold Price PM ($/ozt), while NLR is a Uranium fund tracking the MVIS Global Uranium & Nuclear Energy Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, OUNZ returned 11.40%/yr vs 12.50%/yr for NLR. At a 0.19 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. OUNZ charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.56%/yr for NLR.
Performance
OUNZ vs. NLR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, OUNZ achieves a -6.68% return, which is significantly lower than NLR's -5.48% return. Over the past 10 years, OUNZ has underperformed NLR with an annualized return of 11.40%, while NLR has yielded a comparatively higher 12.50% annualized return.
OUNZ
- 1D
- 0.94%
- 1M
- -10.70%
- YTD
- -6.68%
- 6M
- -10.23%
- 1Y
- 20.52%
- 3Y*
- 27.61%
- 5Y*
- 17.45%
- 10Y*
- 11.40%
NLR
- 1D
- -1.72%
- 1M
- -12.79%
- YTD
- -5.48%
- 6M
- -8.75%
- 1Y
- 10.82%
- 3Y*
- 29.67%
- 5Y*
- 19.89%
- 10Y*
- 12.50%
OUNZ vs. NLR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OUNZ VanEck Merk Gold ETF | -6.68% | 63.95% | 26.75% | 12.83% | -0.51% | -4.00% | 24.71% | 18.00% | -2.06% | 12.82% |
NLR VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF | -5.48% | 56.50% | 14.26% | 36.67% | 2.29% | 13.63% | 3.49% | 0.20% | 4.94% | 8.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between OUNZ and NLR is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 16, 2014 | 0.19 |
Over the past year, OUNZ and NLR have become more correlated (0.40) than their long-term average of 0.19, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
OUNZ vs. NLR — Risk / Return Rank
OUNZ
NLR
OUNZ vs. NLR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Merk Gold ETF (OUNZ) and VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF (NLR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| OUNZ | NLR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.50 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.44 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.08 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.79 | 0.37 | +0.42 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.20 | 0.77 | +1.43 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
OUNZ vs. NLR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OUNZ drawdown since its inception was -26.09%, smaller than the maximum NLR drawdown of -65.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OUNZ and NLR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| OUNZ | NLR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.09% | -65.05% | +38.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.09% | -29.72% | +3.63% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.09% | -30.48% | +4.39% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.09% | -30.48% | +4.39% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -26.09% | -34.35% | +8.26% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -25.40% | -28.58% | +3.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.64% | -35.68% | +28.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.33% | 14.05% | -4.72% |
Volatility
OUNZ vs. NLR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for VanEck Merk Gold ETF (OUNZ) is 8.64%, while VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF (NLR) has a volatility of 13.33%. This indicates that OUNZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NLR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| OUNZ | NLR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.64% | 13.33% | -4.69% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.28% | 32.82% | -8.54% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.49% | 42.83% | -15.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.21% | 29.66% | -11.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.08% | 24.27% | -8.19% |
OUNZ vs. NLR - Expense Ratio Comparison
OUNZ has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than NLR's 0.56% expense ratio.
Dividends
OUNZ vs. NLR - Dividend Comparison
OUNZ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NLR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.70%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NLR VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF | 2.70% | 2.55% | 0.76% | 4.54% | 2.02% | 1.99% | 2.23% | 2.21% | 3.91% | 4.86% | 3.62% | 3.30% |
OUNZ VanEck Merk Gold ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
OUNZ and NLR have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NLR has higher volatility (13.33%) compared to OUNZ (8.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OUNZ dropped -26.09% vs NLR's -65.05%.
On 10-year performance, NLR leads with 12.50% vs 11.40% for OUNZ. On fees, OUNZ is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, OUNZ has been the lower-risk option at 8.64%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, NLR has performed better with a 12.50% return vs 11.40%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
OUNZ is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.56% for NLR.
NLR has the higher dividend yield at 2.70%, compared with 0.00% for OUNZ.
OUNZ is categorized as Gold, while NLR is Uranium. OUNZ tracks LBMA Gold Price PM ($/ozt), while NLR tracks MVIS Global Uranium & Nuclear Energy Index. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for OUNZ and 0.56% for NLR.
OUNZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.75 vs 0.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for OUNZ and NLR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer