OTGL vs. BNO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

OTGL (OTG Latin America ETF) and BNO (United States Brent Oil Fund LP) are both exchange-traded funds - OTGL is a Latin America Equities fund tracking the Actively Managed, while BNO is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the Front Month Brent Crude Oil. Both are passively managed. At a correlation of -0.23, they often move in opposite directions. OTGL charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for BNO.

Performance

OTGL vs. BNO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in OTG Latin America ETF (OTGL) and United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OTGL achieves a 5.63% return, which is significantly lower than BNO's 90.47% return.

OTGL

• 1D: -1.90%
• 1M: -1.12%
• YTD: 5.63%
• 6M: 5.67%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BNO

• 1D: 1.99%
• 1M: -10.29%
• YTD: 90.47%
• 6M: 86.00%
• 1Y: 91.89%
• 3Y*: 27.93%
• 5Y*: 24.16%
• 10Y*: 13.60%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OTGL vs. BNO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
OTGL OTG Latin America ETF	5.63%	13.64%
BNO United States Brent Oil Fund LP	90.47%	-6.66%

Correlation

The correlation between OTGL and BNO is -0.23, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2025	-0.23

Return for Risk

OTGL vs. BNO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BNO

BNO Risk / Return Rank: 65
BNO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
BNO Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
BNO Omega Ratio Rank: 60
BNO Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
BNO Martin Ratio Rank: 55

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OTGL vs. BNO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for OTG Latin America ETF (OTGL) and United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	OTGL	BNO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	2.23	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.69	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.37	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.20	0.14	+1.06

Drawdowns

OTGL vs. BNO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OTGL drawdown since its inception was -13.52%, smaller than the maximum BNO drawdown of -87.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OTGL and BNO.

Drawdown Indicators

	OTGL	BNO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-13.52%	-87.06%	+73.54%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-17.87%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-23.75%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-33.70%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-75.18%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-8.97%	-10.29%	+1.32%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.00%	-40.17%	+37.17%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	9.45%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	OTGL	BNO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	14.22%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	36.10%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.02%	41.46%	-22.44%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.02%	35.38%	-16.36%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.02%	36.68%	-17.66%

OTGL vs. BNO - Expense Ratio Comparison

OTGL has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than BNO's 0.90% expense ratio.

Dividends

OTGL vs. BNO - Dividend Comparison

OTGL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.83%, while BNO has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
BNO United States Brent Oil Fund LP	0.00%	0.00%
OTGL OTG Latin America ETF	1.83%	1.89%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both OTGL and BNO in my portfolio?

OTGL and BNO have a correlation of -0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, OTGL or BNO?

On fees, BNO is cheaper at 0.90% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, OTGL or BNO?

BNO is cheaper with a 0.90% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for OTGL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, OTGL or BNO?

OTGL has the higher dividend yield at 1.83%, compared with 0.00% for BNO.

What is the main difference between OTGL and BNO?

OTGL is categorized as Latin America Equities, while BNO is Oil & Gas. OTGL tracks Actively Managed, while BNO tracks Front Month Brent Crude Oil. They also come from different issuers: OTG and Concierge Technologies. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for OTGL and 0.90% for BNO.