PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
OTF vs. ATH.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

OTF vs. ATH.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Blue Owl Technology Finance Corp (OTF) and Athabasca Oil Corporation (ATH.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

OTF is traded in USD, while ATH.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the ATH.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OTF achieves a -25.11% return, which is significantly lower than ATH.TO's 49.38% return.


OTF

1D
0.50%
1M
-1.10%
6M
-23.05%
YTD
-25.11%
1Y
-26.31%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-28.82%

ATH.TO

1D
0.03%
1M
1.34%
6M
52.04%
YTD
49.38%
1Y
88.76%
3Y*
43.06%
5Y*
63.97%
10Y*
22.02%
ALL TIME*
-3.75%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OTF vs. ATH.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
OTF
Blue Owl Technology Finance Corp
-25.11%-8.23%
ATH.TO
Athabasca Oil Corporation
49.38%23.97%

Correlation

The correlation between OTF and ATH.TO is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.03

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 12, 2025

0.02

Fundamentals

Market Cap

OTF:

$4.70B

ATH.TO:

CA$5.20B

EPS

OTF:

$2.10

ATH.TO:

CA$0.45

PE Ratio

OTF:

4.84

ATH.TO:

24.08

PEG Ratio

OTF:

0.01

ATH.TO:

0.92

PS Ratio

OTF:

3.19

ATH.TO:

3.91

PB Ratio

OTF:

0.62

ATH.TO:

2.83

Total Revenue (TTM)

OTF:

$1.24B

ATH.TO:

CA$1.35B

Gross Profit (TTM)

OTF:

$661.92M

ATH.TO:

CA$518.18M

EBITDA (TTM)

OTF:

$802.86M

ATH.TO:

CA$505.02M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

OTF vs. ATH.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OTF
OTF Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
OTF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OTF Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
OTF Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
OTF Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
OTF Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank

ATH.TO
ATH.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
ATH.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ATH.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
ATH.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
ATH.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
ATH.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OTF vs. ATH.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Blue Owl Technology Finance Corp (OTF) and Athabasca Oil Corporation (ATH.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


OTFATH.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.75

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.88

1.36

-0.48

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.94

3.69

-4.63

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.75

10.72

-12.47

OTF vs. ATH.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OTF Sharpe Ratio is -0.82, which is lower than the ATH.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OTF and ATH.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

OTF vs. ATH.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OTF drawdown since its inception was -33.06%, smaller than the maximum ATH.TO drawdown of -99.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OTF and ATH.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


OTFATH.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.06%

-99.59%

+66.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-27.99%

-24.18%

-3.81%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.96%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-47.55%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-94.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-31.28%

-59.92%

+28.64%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.86%

-76.78%

+58.92%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

15.31%

8.30%

+7.01%

Volatility

OTF vs. ATH.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Blue Owl Technology Finance Corp (OTF) is 6.99%, while Athabasca Oil Corporation (ATH.TO) has a volatility of 11.86%. This indicates that OTF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ATH.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


OTFATH.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.99%

11.86%

-4.87%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

26.27%

31.48%

-5.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

32.37%

38.45%

-6.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

31.50%

49.59%

-18.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

31.50%

61.91%

-30.41%

Dividends

OTF vs. ATH.TO - Dividend Comparison

OTF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.76%, while ATH.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025
ATH.TO
Athabasca Oil Corporation
0.00%0.00%
OTF
Blue Owl Technology Finance Corp
15.76%7.91%

Financials

OTF vs. ATH.TO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Blue Owl Technology Finance Corp and Athabasca Oil Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


100.00M200.00M300.00M400.00MOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
310.42M
377.38M
(OTF) Total Revenue
(ATH.TO) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. OTF values in USD, ATH.TO values in CAD

OTF vs. ATH.TO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Blue Owl Technology Finance Corp and Athabasca Oil Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%October2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober20260
35.8%
Portfolio components
OTF - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Blue Owl Technology Finance Corp reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 310.42M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

ATH.TO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Athabasca Oil Corporation reported a gross profit of 134.91M and revenue of 377.38M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 35.8%.

OTF - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Blue Owl Technology Finance Corp reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 310.42M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.

ATH.TO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Athabasca Oil Corporation reported an operating income of 90.74M and revenue of 377.38M, resulting in an operating margin of 24.0%.

OTF - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Blue Owl Technology Finance Corp reported a net income of 171.31M and revenue of 310.42M, resulting in a net margin of 55.2%.

ATH.TO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Athabasca Oil Corporation reported a net income of 46.29M and revenue of 377.38M, resulting in a net margin of 12.3%.


Frequently Asked Questions


OTF and ATH.TO have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for OTF and ATH.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer