PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
OTF vs. C
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

OTF vs. C - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Blue Owl Technology Finance Corp (OTF) and Citigroup Inc. (C). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OTF achieves a -22.83% return, which is significantly lower than C's 21.15% return.


OTF

1D
-1.88%
1M
-0.33%
6M
-20.98%
YTD
-22.83%
1Y
-24.06%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

C

1D
-0.11%
1M
7.73%
6M
19.09%
YTD
21.15%
1Y
61.34%
3Y*
48.94%
5Y*
18.77%
10Y*
16.17%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OTF vs. C - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
OTF
Blue Owl Technology Finance Corp
-22.83%-8.23%
C
Citigroup Inc.
21.15%50.75%

Correlation

The correlation between OTF and C is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.27

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 12, 2025

0.28

Fundamentals

Market Cap

OTF:

$4.84B

C:

$239.97B

EPS

OTF:

$2.10

C:

$8.72

PE Ratio

OTF:

4.99

C:

16.05

PS Ratio

OTF:

3.28

C:

1.50

PB Ratio

OTF:

0.64

C:

1.30

Total Revenue (TTM)

OTF:

$1.24B

C:

$171.19B

Gross Profit (TTM)

OTF:

$661.92M

C:

$77.85B

EBITDA (TTM)

OTF:

$802.86M

C:

$24.12B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

OTF vs. C — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OTF
OTF Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
OTF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OTF Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
OTF Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
OTF Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
OTF Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank

C
C Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
C Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
C Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
C Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
C Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
C Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OTF vs. C - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Blue Owl Technology Finance Corp (OTF) and Citigroup Inc. (C). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


OTFCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.89

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.89

1.37

-0.48

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.82

4.42

-5.24

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.57

12.69

-14.27

OTF vs. C - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OTF Sharpe Ratio is -0.73, which is lower than the C Sharpe Ratio of 2.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OTF and C, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

OTF vs. C - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OTF drawdown since its inception was -33.06%, smaller than the maximum C drawdown of -98.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OTF and C.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


OTFCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.06%

-98.00%

+64.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-28.77%

-14.76%

-14.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-31.31%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-44.31%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-56.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-29.18%

-62.64%

+33.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.33%

-43.53%

+26.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

14.87%

5.14%

+9.73%

Volatility

OTF vs. C - Volatility Comparison

Blue Owl Technology Finance Corp (OTF) has a higher volatility of 9.77% compared to Citigroup Inc. (C) at 7.37%. This indicates that OTF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than C based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


OTFCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.77%

7.37%

+2.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

26.98%

22.96%

+4.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

32.18%

28.22%

+3.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

31.94%

29.10%

+2.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

31.94%

32.99%

-1.05%

Dividends

OTF vs. C - Dividend Comparison

OTF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.30%, more than C's 1.71% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
C
Citigroup Inc.
1.71%1.99%3.10%4.04%4.51%3.38%3.31%2.40%2.96%1.29%0.71%0.31%
OTF
Blue Owl Technology Finance Corp
15.30%7.91%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

OTF vs. C - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Blue Owl Technology Finance Corp and Citigroup Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0010.00B20.00B30.00B40.00BOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
310.42M
44.14B
(OTF) Total Revenue
(C) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

OTF vs. C - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Blue Owl Technology Finance Corp and Citigroup Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%October2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober20260
49.3%
Portfolio components
OTF - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Blue Owl Technology Finance Corp reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 310.42M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

C - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Citigroup Inc. reported a gross profit of 21.76B and revenue of 44.14B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 49.3%.

OTF - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Blue Owl Technology Finance Corp reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 310.42M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.

C - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Citigroup Inc. reported an operating income of 7.52B and revenue of 44.14B, resulting in an operating margin of 17.0%.

OTF - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Blue Owl Technology Finance Corp reported a net income of 171.31M and revenue of 310.42M, resulting in a net margin of 55.2%.

C - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Citigroup Inc. reported a net income of 5.79B and revenue of 44.14B, resulting in a net margin of 13.1%.


Frequently Asked Questions


OTF and C have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

OTF has higher volatility (9.77%) compared to C (7.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OTF dropped -33.06% vs C's -98.00%.

C currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.31 vs -0.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for OTF and C

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer