OTF vs. C
Compare and contrast key facts about Blue Owl Technology Finance Corp (OTF) and Citigroup Inc. (C).
Performance
OTF vs. C - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
OTF vs. C - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
OTF Blue Owl Technology Finance Corp | -11.99% | -4.96% |
C Citigroup Inc. | -2.30% | 51.04% |
Fundamentals
OTF:
$3.28
C:
$7.64
OTF:
3.78
C:
14.85
OTF:
0.01
C:
0.66
OTF:
1.77
C:
1.44
OTF:
$1.10B
C:
$147.32B
OTF:
$529.09M
C:
$77.20B
OTF:
$725.61M
C:
$23.10B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, OTF achieves a -11.99% return, which is significantly lower than C's -2.30% return.
OTF
- 1D
- 1.64%
- 1M
- 14.77%
- YTD
- -11.99%
- 6M
- -4.80%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
C
- 1D
- 5.72%
- 1M
- 2.92%
- YTD
- -2.30%
- 6M
- 12.99%
- 1Y
- 63.91%
- 3Y*
- 38.99%
- 5Y*
- 13.06%
- 10Y*
- 13.63%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
OTF vs. C — Risk / Return Rank
OTF
C
OTF vs. C - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Blue Owl Technology Finance Corp (OTF) and Citigroup Inc. (C). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| OTF | C | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.94 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.45 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.41 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.67 | 0.15 | -0.81 |
Correlation
The correlation between OTF and C is 0.30, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
OTF vs. C - Dividend Comparison
OTF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.51%, more than C's 2.08% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OTF Blue Owl Technology Finance Corp | 12.51% | 7.91% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
C Citigroup Inc. | 2.08% | 1.99% | 3.10% | 4.04% | 4.51% | 3.38% | 3.31% | 2.40% | 2.96% | 1.29% | 0.71% | 0.31% |
Drawdowns
OTF vs. C - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OTF drawdown since its inception was -27.12%, smaller than the maximum C drawdown of -98.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OTF and C.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| OTF | C | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.12% | -98.00% | +70.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -18.99% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -47.80% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -56.51% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.35% | -69.87% | +53.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.10% | -43.42% | +32.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 5.80% | — |
Volatility
OTF vs. C - Volatility Comparison
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| OTF | C | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 9.95% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 22.66% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.36% | 33.08% | -2.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.36% | 28.91% | +1.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.36% | 33.25% | -2.89% |
Financials
OTF vs. C - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Blue Owl Technology Finance Corp and Citigroup Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
OTF vs. C - Profitability Comparison
OTF - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Blue Owl Technology Finance Corp reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 344.93M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
C - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Citigroup Inc. reported a gross profit of 19.87B and revenue of 19.87B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 100.0%.
OTF - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Blue Owl Technology Finance Corp reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 344.93M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.
C - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Citigroup Inc. reported an operating income of 3.81B and revenue of 19.87B, resulting in an operating margin of 19.2%.
OTF - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Blue Owl Technology Finance Corp reported a net income of 0.00 and revenue of 344.93M, resulting in a net margin of 0.0%.
C - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Citigroup Inc. reported a net income of 2.47B and revenue of 19.87B, resulting in a net margin of 12.4%.