OTCAX vs. MMGPX
OTCAX (MFS Mid Cap Growth Fund) and MMGPX (Morgan Stanley Discovery Portfolio) are both Mid Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, OTCAX returned 3.22%/yr vs -6.17%/yr for MMGPX. Their 0.78 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. OTCAX charges 1.00%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for MMGPX.
Performance
OTCAX vs. MMGPX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, OTCAX achieves a 2.18% return, which is significantly higher than MMGPX's -0.96% return.
OTCAX
- 1D
- 2.10%
- 1M
- -3.22%
- 6M
- 2.83%
- YTD
- 2.18%
- 1Y
- -1.26%
- 3Y*
- 11.20%
- 5Y*
- 3.22%
- 10Y*
- 11.54%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.63%
MMGPX
- 1D
- 2.26%
- 1M
- -3.86%
- 6M
- 4.78%
- YTD
- -0.96%
- 1Y
- -10.52%
- 3Y*
- 17.63%
- 5Y*
- -6.17%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 14.86%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
OTCAX vs. MMGPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OTCAX MFS Mid Cap Growth Fund | 2.18% | 3.32% | 23.47% | 21.00% | -28.53% | 13.66% | 35.34% | 37.43% | 0.82% | 22.67% |
MMGPX Morgan Stanley Discovery Portfolio | -0.96% | 12.58% | 41.83% | 44.34% | -63.37% | -11.55% | 152.67% | 40.20% | 10.89% | 28.18% |
Correlation
The correlation between OTCAX and MMGPX is 0.75, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.75 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.75 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.79 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 2017 | 0.78 |
The correlation between OTCAX and MMGPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
OTCAX vs. MMGPX — Risk / Return Rank
OTCAX
MMGPX
OTCAX vs. MMGPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS Mid Cap Growth Fund (OTCAX) and Morgan Stanley Discovery Portfolio (MMGPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| OTCAX | MMGPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.16 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.16 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.99 | 0.97 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.19 | -0.34 | +0.16 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.46 | -0.66 | +0.20 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
OTCAX vs. MMGPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OTCAX drawdown since its inception was -74.39%, roughly equal to the maximum MMGPX drawdown of -75.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OTCAX and MMGPX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| OTCAX | MMGPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -74.39% | -75.38% | +0.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.46% | -27.79% | +11.33% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.05% | -29.27% | +8.22% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.85% | -72.70% | +35.85% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.85% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.51% | -40.82% | +35.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.03% | -30.40% | +7.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.60% | 14.47% | -7.87% |
Volatility
OTCAX vs. MMGPX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for MFS Mid Cap Growth Fund (OTCAX) is 4.82%, while Morgan Stanley Discovery Portfolio (MMGPX) has a volatility of 6.84%. This indicates that OTCAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MMGPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| OTCAX | MMGPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.82% | 6.84% | -2.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.58% | 21.99% | -7.41% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.73% | 28.90% | -11.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.39% | 39.83% | -19.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.02% | 35.11% | -15.09% |
OTCAX vs. MMGPX - Expense Ratio Comparison
OTCAX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than MMGPX's 0.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
OTCAX vs. MMGPX - Dividend Comparison
OTCAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 16.40%, while MMGPX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MMGPX Morgan Stanley Discovery Portfolio | 0.00% | 0.43% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 125.40% | 64.53% | 7.93% | 15.63% | 28.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
OTCAX MFS Mid Cap Growth Fund | 16.40% | 16.76% | 15.59% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 3.64% | 0.83% | 0.86% | 4.70% | 8.80% | 5.67% | 2.84% |
Frequently Asked Questions
OTCAX and MMGPX have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MMGPX has higher volatility (6.84%) compared to OTCAX (4.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OTCAX dropped -74.39% vs MMGPX's -75.38%.
OTCAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.17 vs -0.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for OTCAX and MMGPX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer