MMGPX vs. HLGEX
MMGPX (Morgan Stanley Discovery Portfolio) and HLGEX (JPMorgan Mid Cap Growth Fund) are both Mid Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, MMGPX returned -7.25%/yr vs 5.86%/yr for HLGEX. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. MMGPX charges 0.04%/yr vs 0.89%/yr for HLGEX.
Performance
MMGPX vs. HLGEX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MMGPX achieves a -2.33% return, which is significantly lower than HLGEX's 7.34% return.
MMGPX
- 1D
- -1.11%
- 1M
- -4.55%
- YTD
- -2.33%
- 6M
- -5.94%
- 1Y
- -6.55%
- 3Y*
- 22.02%
- 5Y*
- -7.25%
- 10Y*
- —
HLGEX
- 1D
- 0.43%
- 1M
- 3.92%
- YTD
- 7.34%
- 6M
- 5.13%
- 1Y
- 11.91%
- 3Y*
- 16.51%
- 5Y*
- 5.86%
- 10Y*
- 14.35%
MMGPX vs. HLGEX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MMGPX Morgan Stanley Discovery Portfolio | -2.33% | 12.58% | 41.83% | 44.34% | -63.37% | -11.55% | 152.67% | 40.20% | 10.89% | 28.18% |
HLGEX JPMorgan Mid Cap Growth Fund | 7.34% | 8.65% | 22.80% | 23.11% | -27.08% | 10.67% | 48.33% | 39.73% | -5.07% | 23.84% |
Correlation
The correlation between MMGPX and HLGEX is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 2017 | 0.83 |
The correlation between MMGPX and HLGEX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MMGPX vs. HLGEX — Risk / Return Rank
MMGPX
HLGEX
MMGPX vs. HLGEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Morgan Stanley Discovery Portfolio (MMGPX) and JPMorgan Mid Cap Growth Fund (HLGEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MMGPX | HLGEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.91 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.19 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.99 | 1.13 | -0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.20 | 0.92 | -1.11 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.40 | 2.90 | -3.30 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MMGPX vs. HLGEX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MMGPX drawdown since its inception was -75.38%, which is greater than HLGEX's maximum drawdown of -57.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MMGPX and HLGEX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MMGPX | HLGEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -75.38% | -57.65% | -17.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -27.79% | -14.19% | -13.60% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.27% | -25.50% | -3.77% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -72.70% | -37.16% | -35.54% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -37.16% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -41.64% | 0.00% | -41.64% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -30.29% | -11.42% | -18.87% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.62% | 4.47% | +9.15% |
Volatility
MMGPX vs. HLGEX - Volatility Comparison
Morgan Stanley Discovery Portfolio (MMGPX) has a higher volatility of 9.77% compared to JPMorgan Mid Cap Growth Fund (HLGEX) at 6.14%. This indicates that MMGPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HLGEX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MMGPX | HLGEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.77% | 6.14% | +3.63% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.75% | 14.35% | +7.40% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.61% | 18.14% | +10.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 39.83% | 22.41% | +17.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 35.22% | 22.02% | +13.20% |
MMGPX vs. HLGEX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MMGPX has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than HLGEX's 0.89% expense ratio.
Dividends
MMGPX vs. HLGEX - Dividend Comparison
MMGPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.44%, less than HLGEX's 8.79% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HLGEX JPMorgan Mid Cap Growth Fund | 8.79% | 9.43% | 14.70% | 0.00% | 0.79% | 8.87% | 10.61% | 7.29% | 7.26% | 6.41% | 0.04% | 5.32% |
MMGPX Morgan Stanley Discovery Portfolio | 0.44% | 0.43% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 125.40% | 64.53% | 7.93% | 15.63% | 28.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MMGPX and HLGEX have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MMGPX has higher volatility (9.77%) compared to HLGEX (6.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MMGPX dropped -75.38% vs HLGEX's -57.65%.
HLGEX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.72 vs -0.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MMGPX and HLGEX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer