OTCAX vs. XMHQ
Compare and contrast key facts about MFS Mid Cap Growth Fund (OTCAX) and Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF (XMHQ).
OTCAX is managed by MFS. It was launched on Dec 1, 1993. XMHQ is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P MidCap 400 Index. It was launched on Dec 1, 2006.
Performance
OTCAX vs. XMHQ - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
OTCAX vs. XMHQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OTCAX MFS Mid Cap Growth Fund | -6.41% | 3.32% | 23.47% | 21.00% | -28.53% | 13.66% | 35.34% | 37.43% | 0.82% | 25.95% |
XMHQ Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF | 2.09% | 4.71% | 16.79% | 29.51% | -12.42% | 20.98% | 26.61% | 27.18% | -9.08% | 15.64% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, OTCAX achieves a -6.41% return, which is significantly lower than XMHQ's 2.09% return. Over the past 10 years, OTCAX has underperformed XMHQ with an annualized return of 11.20%, while XMHQ has yielded a comparatively higher 12.53% annualized return.
OTCAX
- 1D
- 3.59%
- 1M
- -6.60%
- YTD
- -6.41%
- 6M
- -10.76%
- 1Y
- 2.30%
- 3Y*
- 10.38%
- 5Y*
- 3.37%
- 10Y*
- 11.20%
XMHQ
- 1D
- 1.01%
- 1M
- -4.01%
- YTD
- 2.09%
- 6M
- -0.40%
- 1Y
- 13.46%
- 3Y*
- 14.90%
- 5Y*
- 8.29%
- 10Y*
- 12.53%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
OTCAX vs. XMHQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
OTCAX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than XMHQ's 0.25% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
OTCAX vs. XMHQ — Risk / Return Rank
OTCAX
XMHQ
OTCAX vs. XMHQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS Mid Cap Growth Fund (OTCAX) and Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF (XMHQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| OTCAX | XMHQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.15 | 0.67 | -0.52 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.35 | 1.13 | -0.78 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | 1.14 | -0.10 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.18 | 1.18 | -1.00 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.51 | 4.29 | -3.78 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| OTCAX | XMHQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.15 | 0.67 | -0.52 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.17 | 0.40 | -0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.56 | 0.61 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.37 | 0.44 | -0.06 |
Correlation
The correlation between OTCAX and XMHQ is 0.77, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
OTCAX vs. XMHQ - Dividend Comparison
OTCAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 17.91%, more than XMHQ's 0.59% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OTCAX MFS Mid Cap Growth Fund | 17.91% | 16.76% | 15.59% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 3.64% | 0.83% | 0.86% | 4.70% | 8.80% | 5.67% | 2.84% |
XMHQ Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF | 0.59% | 0.64% | 5.20% | 0.73% | 1.72% | 1.00% | 1.12% | 1.22% | 1.59% | 1.06% | 1.63% | 1.34% |
Drawdowns
OTCAX vs. XMHQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OTCAX drawdown since its inception was -74.39%, which is greater than XMHQ's maximum drawdown of -58.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OTCAX and XMHQ.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| OTCAX | XMHQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -74.39% | -58.19% | -16.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.46% | -12.54% | -3.92% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.85% | -25.47% | -11.38% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.85% | -36.90% | +0.05% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.46% | -4.40% | -9.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.21% | -9.35% | -13.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.84% | 3.44% | +2.40% |
Volatility
OTCAX vs. XMHQ - Volatility Comparison
MFS Mid Cap Growth Fund (OTCAX) has a higher volatility of 7.09% compared to Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF (XMHQ) at 5.99%. This indicates that OTCAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XMHQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| OTCAX | XMHQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.09% | 5.99% | +1.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.06% | 11.42% | +1.64% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.72% | 20.29% | +0.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.13% | 20.76% | -0.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.89% | 20.69% | -0.80% |