PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
OTCAX vs. JHMM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

OTCAX vs. JHMM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MFS Mid Cap Growth Fund (OTCAX) and John Hancock Multifactor Mid Cap ETF (JHMM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OTCAX achieves a 4.87% return, which is significantly lower than JHMM's 12.60% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with OTCAX having a 12.24% annualized return and JHMM not far behind at 11.88%.


OTCAX

1D
0.61%
1M
3.80%
YTD
4.87%
6M
3.45%
1Y
4.29%
3Y*
14.31%
5Y*
5.78%
10Y*
12.24%

JHMM

1D
-0.24%
1M
3.21%
YTD
12.60%
6M
13.14%
1Y
24.83%
3Y*
17.01%
5Y*
8.39%
10Y*
11.88%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OTCAX vs. JHMM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
OTCAX
MFS Mid Cap Growth Fund
4.87%3.32%23.47%21.00%-28.53%13.66%35.34%37.43%0.82%25.95%
JHMM
John Hancock Multifactor Mid Cap ETF
12.60%10.73%14.61%14.53%-15.30%24.54%16.22%30.01%-9.57%19.96%

Correlation

The correlation between OTCAX and JHMM is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.81

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.84

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2015

0.86

The correlation between OTCAX and JHMM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

OTCAX vs. JHMM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OTCAX
OTCAX Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
OTCAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OTCAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
OTCAX Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
OTCAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
OTCAX Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank

JHMM
JHMM Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
JHMM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JHMM Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
JHMM Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
JHMM Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
JHMM Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OTCAX vs. JHMM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS Mid Cap Growth Fund (OTCAX) and John Hancock Multifactor Mid Cap ETF (JHMM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


OTCAXJHMMDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.31

1.77

-1.46

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.55

2.55

-2.00

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

1.31

-0.25

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.31

2.89

-2.58

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

0.79

11.17

-10.38

OTCAX vs. JHMM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OTCAX Sharpe Ratio is 0.31, which is lower than the JHMM Sharpe Ratio of 1.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OTCAX and JHMM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


OTCAXJHMMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.31

1.77

-1.46

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.29

0.46

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.62

0.61

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.39

0.63

-0.24

Drawdowns

OTCAX vs. JHMM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OTCAX drawdown since its inception was -74.39%, which is greater than JHMM's maximum drawdown of -40.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OTCAX and JHMM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


OTCAXJHMMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-74.39%

-40.71%

-33.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.46%

-8.64%

-7.82%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.05%

-21.88%

+0.83%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.85%

-24.10%

-12.75%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.85%

-40.71%

+3.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.02%

-0.24%

-2.78%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-23.13%

-5.43%

-17.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.39%

2.23%

+4.16%

Volatility

OTCAX vs. JHMM - Volatility Comparison

MFS Mid Cap Growth Fund (OTCAX) has a higher volatility of 4.19% compared to John Hancock Multifactor Mid Cap ETF (JHMM) at 3.81%. This indicates that OTCAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JHMM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


OTCAXJHMMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.19%

3.81%

+0.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.34%

10.47%

+2.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.53%

14.12%

+2.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.18%

18.32%

+1.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.96%

19.60%

+0.36%

OTCAX vs. JHMM - Expense Ratio Comparison

OTCAX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than JHMM's 0.42% expense ratio.


Dividends

OTCAX vs. JHMM - Dividend Comparison

OTCAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.98%, more than JHMM's 0.87% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JHMM
John Hancock Multifactor Mid Cap ETF
0.87%0.98%1.01%1.17%1.16%0.72%1.04%1.02%1.36%0.90%1.15%0.33%
OTCAX
MFS Mid Cap Growth Fund
15.98%16.76%15.59%0.00%0.00%3.64%0.83%0.86%4.70%8.80%5.67%2.84%

Frequently Asked Questions


OTCAX and JHMM have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

OTCAX has higher volatility (4.19%) compared to JHMM (3.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OTCAX dropped -74.39% vs JHMM's -40.71%.

JHMM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.77 vs 0.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for OTCAX and JHMM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer