PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
OSIS vs. AMAT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

OSIS vs. AMAT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in OSI Systems, Inc. (OSIS) and Applied Materials, Inc. (AMAT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OSIS achieves a -11.58% return, which is significantly lower than AMAT's 121.28% return. Over the past 10 years, OSIS has underperformed AMAT with an annualized return of 15.60%, while AMAT has yielded a comparatively higher 38.86% annualized return.


OSIS

1D
-2.38%
1M
9.80%
YTD
-11.58%
6M
-13.07%
1Y
-1.75%
3Y*
21.66%
5Y*
18.09%
10Y*
15.60%

AMAT

1D
2.64%
1M
30.08%
YTD
121.28%
6M
119.38%
1Y
234.96%
3Y*
60.05%
5Y*
34.02%
10Y*
38.86%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OSIS vs. AMAT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
OSIS
OSI Systems, Inc.
-11.58%52.34%29.74%62.29%-14.68%-0.02%-7.46%37.44%13.86%-15.42%
AMAT
Applied Materials, Inc.
121.28%59.60%1.13%67.97%-37.54%83.64%43.29%89.86%-34.92%59.86%

Correlation

The correlation between OSIS and AMAT is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.36

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.34

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.36

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.37

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 1997

0.31

Fundamentals

Market Cap

OSIS:

$3.93B

AMAT:

$453.23B

EPS

OSIS:

$8.73

AMAT:

$10.61

PE Ratio

OSIS:

25.84

AMAT:

53.45

PEG Ratio

OSIS:

1.04

AMAT:

6.80

PS Ratio

OSIS:

2.18

AMAT:

15.67

PB Ratio

OSIS:

4.39

AMAT:

18.96

Total Revenue (TTM)

OSIS:

$1.81B

AMAT:

$29.02B

Gross Profit (TTM)

OSIS:

$593.38M

AMAT:

$14.21B

EBITDA (TTM)

OSIS:

$184.81M

AMAT:

$9.92B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

OSIS vs. AMAT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OSIS
OSIS Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
OSIS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OSIS Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
OSIS Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
OSIS Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
OSIS Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

AMAT
AMAT Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
AMAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMAT Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
AMAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMAT Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OSIS vs. AMAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for OSI Systems, Inc. (OSIS) and Applied Materials, Inc. (AMAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


OSISAMATDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-4.76

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.96

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.02

1.59

-0.57

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.13

10.67

-10.80

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.41

30.41

-30.82

OSIS vs. AMAT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OSIS Sharpe Ratio is -0.11, which is lower than the AMAT Sharpe Ratio of 4.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OSIS and AMAT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

OSIS vs. AMAT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OSIS drawdown since its inception was -88.44%, roughly equal to the maximum AMAT drawdown of -85.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OSIS and AMAT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


OSISAMATDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-88.44%

-85.22%

-3.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-36.15%

-21.37%

-14.78%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-36.15%

-49.88%

+13.73%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.15%

-55.14%

+18.99%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-53.64%

-55.14%

+1.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-27.17%

0.00%

-27.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-25.68%

-38.78%

+13.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.45%

7.49%

+3.96%

Volatility

OSIS vs. AMAT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for OSI Systems, Inc. (OSIS) is 15.42%, while Applied Materials, Inc. (AMAT) has a volatility of 20.52%. This indicates that OSIS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


OSISAMATDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.42%

20.52%

-5.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

35.27%

38.83%

-3.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

44.65%

49.03%

-4.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

33.57%

44.20%

-10.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.82%

42.94%

-9.12%

Dividends

OSIS vs. AMAT - Dividend Comparison

OSIS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AMAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.34%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AMAT
Applied Materials, Inc.
0.34%0.69%0.93%0.75%1.05%0.60%1.01%1.36%2.14%0.78%1.24%2.14%
OSIS
OSI Systems, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

OSIS vs. AMAT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between OSI Systems, Inc. and Applied Materials, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.002.00B4.00B6.00B8.00B20222023202420252026
453.25M
7.91B
(OSIS) Total Revenue
(AMAT) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

OSIS vs. AMAT - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between OSI Systems, Inc. and Applied Materials, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

35.0%40.0%45.0%50.0%20222023202420252026
33.2%
49.9%
Portfolio components
OSIS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, OSI Systems, Inc. reported a gross profit of 150.32M and revenue of 453.25M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 33.2%.

AMAT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Applied Materials, Inc. reported a gross profit of 3.95B and revenue of 7.91B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 49.9%.

OSIS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, OSI Systems, Inc. reported an operating income of 53.21M and revenue of 453.25M, resulting in an operating margin of 11.7%.

AMAT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Applied Materials, Inc. reported an operating income of 2.52B and revenue of 7.91B, resulting in an operating margin of 31.9%.

OSIS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, OSI Systems, Inc. reported a net income of 40.22M and revenue of 453.25M, resulting in a net margin of 8.9%.

AMAT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Applied Materials, Inc. reported a net income of 2.81B and revenue of 7.91B, resulting in a net margin of 35.5%.


Frequently Asked Questions


OSIS and AMAT have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AMAT has higher volatility (20.52%) compared to OSIS (15.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OSIS dropped -88.44% vs AMAT's -85.22%.

AMAT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.65 vs -0.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for OSIS and AMAT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer