OSEA vs. MCSE

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

OSEA (Harbor International Compounders ETF) and MCSE (Franklin Sustainable International Equity ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, OSEA returned 7.19%/yr vs -0.12%/yr for MCSE. Their 0.78 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. OSEA charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for MCSE.

Performance

OSEA vs. MCSE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Harbor International Compounders ETF (OSEA) and Franklin Sustainable International Equity ETF (MCSE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OSEA achieves a 0.69% return, which is significantly lower than MCSE's 1.12% return.

OSEA

• 1D: -0.44%
• 1M: 0.49%
• 6M: 0.27%
• YTD: 0.69%
• 1Y: 9.18%
• 3Y*: 7.19%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 12.41%

MCSE

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• 6M: 0.00%
• YTD: 1.12%
• 1Y: 4.30%
• 3Y*: -0.12%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 6.07%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
MCSE Franklin Sustainable International Equity ETF	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
OSEA Harbor International Compounders ETF	$1.60M	$1.39M	$1.57M

OSEA vs. MCSE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
OSEA Harbor International Compounders ETF	0.69%	18.49%	-0.73%	20.88%	11.38%
MCSE Franklin Sustainable International Equity ETF	1.12%	7.79%	-9.46%	14.86%	10.04%

Correlation

The correlation between OSEA and MCSE is 0.49, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.49
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.75
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 31, 2022	0.78

Over the past year, the correlation between OSEA and MCSE has dropped to 0.49 - well below their long-term average of 0.78, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

OSEA vs. MCSE - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	OSEA	MCSE
Technology	18.9%	31.1%
Industrials	16.2%	18.1%
Financial Services	15.3%	2.1%
Healthcare	11.6%	20.1%
Consumer Defensive	9.6%	5.0%
Consumer Cyclical	5.6%	13.8%
Basic Materials	5.3%	5.1%
Utilities	3.5%	-
Communication Services	3.1%	4.7%
Energy	-	-
Real Estate	-	-

Return for Risk

OSEA vs. MCSE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

OSEA

OSEA Risk / Return Rank: 25
OSEA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 24
OSEA Sortino Ratio Rank: 23
OSEA Omega Ratio Rank: 22
OSEA Calmar Ratio Rank: 25
OSEA Martin Ratio Rank: 29

MCSE

MCSE Risk / Return Rank: 19
MCSE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 20
MCSE Sortino Ratio Rank: 18
MCSE Omega Ratio Rank: 22
MCSE Calmar Ratio Rank: 17
MCSE Martin Ratio Rank: 17

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

OSEA vs. MCSE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harbor International Compounders ETF (OSEA) and Franklin Sustainable International Equity ETF (MCSE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	OSEA	MCSE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.53	0.37	+0.16
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.85	0.58	+0.27
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.10	1.10	0.00
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.75	0.37	+0.38
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.45	0.92	+1.54

OSEA vs. MCSE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OSEA Sharpe Ratio is 0.53, which is higher than the MCSE Sharpe Ratio of 0.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OSEA and MCSE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

OSEA vs. MCSE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OSEA drawdown since its inception was -18.14%, smaller than the maximum MCSE drawdown of -26.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OSEA and MCSE.

Drawdown Indicators

	OSEA	MCSE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.14%	-26.36%	+8.22%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.08%	-10.42%	-0.66%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.14%	-26.36%	+8.22%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.12%	-10.51%	+7.39%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.84%	-8.79%	+4.95%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.39%	4.36%	-0.97%

Volatility

OSEA vs. MCSE - Volatility Comparison

Harbor International Compounders ETF (OSEA) has a higher volatility of 4.22% compared to Franklin Sustainable International Equity ETF (MCSE) at 0.00%. This indicates that OSEA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MCSE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	OSEA	MCSE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.22%	0.00%	+4.22%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.00%	1.91%	+11.09%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.68%	10.71%	+4.97%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.61%	19.08%	-2.47%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.61%	19.08%	-2.47%

OSEA vs. MCSE - Expense Ratio Comparison

OSEA has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than MCSE's 0.59% expense ratio.

Dividends

OSEA vs. MCSE - Dividend Comparison

OSEA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.23%, less than MCSE's 3.74% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
MCSE Franklin Sustainable International Equity ETF	3.74%	3.78%	0.63%	0.57%	0.48%
OSEA Harbor International Compounders ETF	1.23%	1.24%	0.51%	0.65%	0.11%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both OSEA and MCSE in my portfolio?

OSEA and MCSE have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, OSEA or MCSE?

OSEA has higher volatility (4.22%) compared to MCSE (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OSEA dropped -18.14% vs MCSE's -26.36%.

Which ETF is better, OSEA or MCSE?

On 3-year performance, OSEA leads with 7.19% vs -0.12% for MCSE. On fees, OSEA is cheaper at 0.55% per year. On volatility, MCSE has been the lower-risk option at 0.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, OSEA or MCSE?

Over the 3-year period, OSEA has performed better with a 7.19% return vs -0.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, OSEA or MCSE?

OSEA is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for MCSE.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, OSEA or MCSE?

MCSE has the higher dividend yield at 3.74%, compared with 1.23% for OSEA.

What is the main difference between OSEA and MCSE?

They also come from different issuers: Harbor and Franklin. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for OSEA and 0.59% for MCSE.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

OSEA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.53 vs 0.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.