PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
OSEA vs. CLIP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

OSEA vs. CLIP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Harbor International Compounders ETF (OSEA) and Global X 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (CLIP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OSEA achieves a 0.66% return, which is significantly lower than CLIP's 1.71% return.


OSEA

1D
-0.13%
1M
0.36%
YTD
0.66%
6M
1.06%
1Y
8.76%
3Y*
7.66%
5Y*
10Y*

CLIP

1D
0.03%
1M
0.29%
YTD
1.71%
6M
1.82%
1Y
3.97%
3Y*
4.64%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OSEA vs. CLIP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
OSEA
Harbor International Compounders ETF
0.66%18.49%-0.73%3.73%
CLIP
Global X 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF
1.71%4.23%5.26%2.82%

Correlation

The correlation between OSEA and CLIP is -0.11, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.11

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.01

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 21, 2023

-0.01

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

OSEA vs. CLIP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OSEA
OSEA Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
OSEA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OSEA Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
OSEA Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
OSEA Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
OSEA Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

CLIP
CLIP Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
CLIP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CLIP Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
CLIP Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
CLIP Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
CLIP Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OSEA vs. CLIP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harbor International Compounders ETF (OSEA) and Global X 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (CLIP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


OSEACLIPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-17.41

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-80.37

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

26.48

-25.37

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.79

142.41

-141.62

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.76

1,288.03

-1,285.26

OSEA vs. CLIP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OSEA Sharpe Ratio is 0.57, which is lower than the CLIP Sharpe Ratio of 17.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OSEA and CLIP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

OSEA vs. CLIP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OSEA drawdown since its inception was -18.14%, which is greater than CLIP's maximum drawdown of -0.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OSEA and CLIP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


OSEACLIPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.14%

-0.08%

-18.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.08%

-0.03%

-11.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.14%

-0.08%

-18.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.15%

0.00%

-3.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.81%

-0.00%

-3.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.17%

0.00%

+3.17%

Volatility

OSEA vs. CLIP - Volatility Comparison

Harbor International Compounders ETF (OSEA) has a higher volatility of 4.58% compared to Global X 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (CLIP) at 0.07%. This indicates that OSEA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CLIP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


OSEACLIPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.58%

0.07%

+4.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.55%

0.15%

+12.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.46%

0.22%

+15.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.64%

0.44%

+16.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.64%

0.44%

+16.20%

OSEA vs. CLIP - Expense Ratio Comparison

OSEA has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than CLIP's 0.07% expense ratio.


Dividends

OSEA vs. CLIP - Dividend Comparison

OSEA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.23%, less than CLIP's 3.90% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
CLIP
Global X 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF
3.90%4.14%5.11%2.75%0.00%
OSEA
Harbor International Compounders ETF
1.23%1.24%0.51%0.65%0.11%

Frequently Asked Questions


OSEA and CLIP have a correlation of -0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

OSEA has higher volatility (4.58%) compared to CLIP (0.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OSEA dropped -18.14% vs CLIP's -0.08%.

On 3-year performance, OSEA leads with 7.66% vs 4.64% for CLIP. On fees, CLIP is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, CLIP has been the lower-risk option at 0.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, OSEA has performed better with a 7.66% return vs 4.64%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

CLIP is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for OSEA.

CLIP has the higher dividend yield at 3.90%, compared with 1.23% for OSEA.

OSEA is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while CLIP is Ultrashort Bond. They also come from different issuers: Harbor and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for OSEA and 0.07% for CLIP.

CLIP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (17.97 vs 0.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for OSEA and CLIP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer