PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
OSCV vs. QQQS
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

OSCV vs. QQQS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Opus Small Cap Value Plus ETF (OSCV) and Invesco NASDAQ Future Gen 200 ETF (QQQS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

OSCV vs. QQQS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
OSCV
Opus Small Cap Value Plus ETF
6.67%1.35%11.66%10.14%4.14%
QQQS
Invesco NASDAQ Future Gen 200 ETF
-0.97%23.03%10.20%-1.94%6.56%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OSCV achieves a 6.67% return, which is significantly higher than QQQS's -0.97% return.


OSCV

1D
1.68%
1M
-2.78%
YTD
6.67%
6M
3.75%
1Y
14.52%
3Y*
9.67%
5Y*
5.27%
10Y*

QQQS

1D
4.87%
1M
-6.39%
YTD
-0.97%
6M
2.84%
1Y
49.21%
3Y*
8.27%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


OSCV vs. QQQS - Expense Ratio Comparison

OSCV has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQS's 0.20% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

OSCV vs. QQQS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OSCV
OSCV Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
OSCV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OSCV Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
OSCV Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
OSCV Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
OSCV Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQS
QQQS Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
QQQS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQS Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQS Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQS Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OSCV vs. QQQS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Opus Small Cap Value Plus ETF (OSCV) and Invesco NASDAQ Future Gen 200 ETF (QQQS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


OSCVQQQSDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.86

1.61

-0.75

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.31

2.20

-0.89

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.28

-0.10

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.26

2.81

-1.54

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.80

9.71

-4.92

OSCV vs. QQQS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OSCV Sharpe Ratio is 0.86, which is lower than the QQQS Sharpe Ratio of 1.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OSCV and QQQS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


OSCVQQQSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

1.61

-0.75

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.31

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.36

0.36

-0.01

Correlation

The correlation between OSCV and QQQS is 0.71, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

OSCV vs. QQQS - Dividend Comparison

OSCV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.13%, less than QQQS's 3.51% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018
OSCV
Opus Small Cap Value Plus ETF
1.13%1.23%1.29%1.55%1.12%1.06%1.11%1.75%0.25%
QQQS
Invesco NASDAQ Future Gen 200 ETF
3.51%3.48%0.80%0.68%0.04%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

OSCV vs. QQQS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OSCV drawdown since its inception was -42.40%, which is greater than QQQS's maximum drawdown of -38.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OSCV and QQQS.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


OSCVQQQSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.40%

-38.06%

-4.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.67%

-16.53%

+4.86%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.78%

-9.42%

+4.64%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.73%

-13.84%

+6.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.07%

4.78%

-1.71%

Volatility

OSCV vs. QQQS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Opus Small Cap Value Plus ETF (OSCV) is 4.74%, while Invesco NASDAQ Future Gen 200 ETF (QQQS) has a volatility of 10.32%. This indicates that OSCV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


OSCVQQQSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.74%

10.32%

-5.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.52%

19.93%

-10.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.96%

30.79%

-13.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.34%

28.42%

-11.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.05%

28.42%

-7.37%