PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
OSBC vs. CMA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

OSBC vs. CMA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Old Second Bancorp, Inc. (OSBC) and Comerica Incorporated (CMA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


OSBC

1D
0.08%
1M
9.17%
6M
28.26%
YTD
30.95%
1Y
54.52%
3Y*
17.38%
5Y*
18.54%
10Y*
14.15%
ALL TIME*
5.41%

CMA

1D
1M
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$11.96M$10.46M$9.01M

OSBC vs. CMA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
OSBC
Old Second Bancorp, Inc.
30.95%11.25%16.69%-2.37%29.23%26.26%-24.70%3.93%-4.50%23.95%
CMA
Comerica Incorporated
2.00%46.73%16.74%-11.09%-20.38%61.53%-16.79%8.46%-19.18%29.34%

Correlation

The correlation between OSBC and CMA is 0.42, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.42

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.60

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.61

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.61

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 18, 1995

0.36

The correlation between OSBC and CMA shifts across timeframes, from 0.36 (all time) to 0.61 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

OSBC:

$1.30B

CMA:

$11.79B

EPS

OSBC:

$1.74

CMA:

$5.44

PE Ratio

OSBC:

14.54

CMA:

16.31

PS Ratio

OSBC:

3.04

CMA:

2.46

PB Ratio

OSBC:

1.47

CMA:

1.61

Total Revenue (TTM)

OSBC:

$442.28M

CMA:

$4.80B

Gross Profit (TTM)

OSBC:

$254.19M

CMA:

$3.27B

EBITDA (TTM)

OSBC:

$96.42M

CMA:

$989.00M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

OSBC vs. CMA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

OSBC
OSBC Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
OSBC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OSBC Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
OSBC Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
OSBC Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
OSBC Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

CMA

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

OSBC vs. CMA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Old Second Bancorp, Inc. (OSBC) and Comerica Incorporated (CMA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


OSBCCMADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.70

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.46

OSBC vs. CMA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

OSBC vs. CMA - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


OSBCCMADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-97.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.93%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.27%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-60.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-43.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.47%

Volatility

OSBC vs. CMA - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


OSBCCMADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.86%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

34.78%

Dividends

OSBC vs. CMA - Dividend Comparison

OSBC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.11%, while CMA has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CMA
Comerica Incorporated
1.60%3.27%4.59%5.09%4.07%3.13%4.87%3.74%2.68%1.26%1.31%1.98%
OSBC
Old Second Bancorp, Inc.
1.11%1.28%1.18%1.30%1.25%1.27%0.40%0.30%0.31%0.29%0.27%0.00%

Financials

OSBC vs. CMA - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Old Second Bancorp, Inc. and Comerica Incorporated. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

OSBC vs. CMA - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Old Second Bancorp, Inc. and Comerica Incorporated over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

OSBC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Old Second Bancorp, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 101.19M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

CMA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Comerica Incorporated reported a gross profit of 836.00M and revenue of 1.21B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 69.4%.

OSBC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Old Second Bancorp, Inc. reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 101.19M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.

CMA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Comerica Incorporated reported an operating income of 219.00M and revenue of 1.21B, resulting in an operating margin of 18.2%.

OSBC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Old Second Bancorp, Inc. reported a net income of 28.18M and revenue of 101.19M, resulting in a net margin of 27.9%.

CMA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Comerica Incorporated reported a net income of 176.00M and revenue of 1.21B, resulting in a net margin of 14.6%.


Frequently Asked Questions


OSBC and CMA have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for OSBC and CMA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer