PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
OSBC vs. CMA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

OSBC vs. CMA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Old Second Bancorp, Inc. (OSBC) and Comerica Incorporated (CMA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


OSBC

1D
0.87%
1M
4.74%
YTD
14.02%
6M
8.35%
1Y
34.02%
3Y*
20.60%
5Y*
13.17%
10Y*
13.30%

CMA

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OSBC vs. CMA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
OSBC
Old Second Bancorp, Inc.
14.02%11.25%16.69%-2.37%29.23%26.26%-24.70%3.93%-4.50%23.95%
CMA
Comerica Incorporated
2.00%46.73%16.74%-11.09%-20.38%61.53%-16.79%8.46%-19.18%29.34%

Correlation

The correlation between OSBC and CMA is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.48

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.61

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.62

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.61

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 18, 1995

0.36

The correlation between OSBC and CMA shifts across timeframes, from 0.36 (all time) to 0.62 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

OSBC:

$2.25

CMA:

$5.44

PE Ratio

OSBC:

9.79

CMA:

16.31

PS Ratio

OSBC:

2.04

CMA:

2.46

Total Revenue (TTM)

OSBC:

$412.93M

CMA:

$4.80B

Gross Profit (TTM)

OSBC:

$240.87M

CMA:

$3.27B

EBITDA (TTM)

OSBC:

$91.93M

CMA:

$989.00M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

OSBC vs. CMA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OSBC
OSBC Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
OSBC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OSBC Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
OSBC Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
OSBC Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
OSBC Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

CMA

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OSBC vs. CMA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Old Second Bancorp, Inc. (OSBC) and Comerica Incorporated (CMA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


OSBCCMADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.65

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.21

OSBC vs. CMA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

OSBC vs. CMA - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


OSBCCMADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-97.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.91%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.27%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-60.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-22.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-43.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.49%

Volatility

OSBC vs. CMA - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


OSBCCMADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.77%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

34.91%

Dividends

OSBC vs. CMA - Dividend Comparison

OSBC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.22%, while CMA has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CMA
Comerica Incorporated
1.60%3.27%4.59%5.09%4.07%3.13%4.87%3.74%2.68%1.26%1.31%1.98%
OSBC
Old Second Bancorp, Inc.
1.22%1.28%1.18%1.30%1.25%1.27%0.40%0.30%0.31%0.29%0.27%0.00%

Financials

OSBC vs. CMA - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Old Second Bancorp, Inc. and Comerica Incorporated. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00200.00M400.00M600.00M800.00M1.00B1.20B1.40B20222023202420252026
98.35M
1.21B
(OSBC) Total Revenue
(CMA) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

OSBC vs. CMA - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Old Second Bancorp, Inc. and Comerica Incorporated over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%202220232024202520260
69.4%
Portfolio components
OSBC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Old Second Bancorp, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 98.35M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

CMA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Comerica Incorporated reported a gross profit of 836.00M and revenue of 1.21B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 69.4%.

OSBC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Old Second Bancorp, Inc. reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 98.35M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.

CMA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Comerica Incorporated reported an operating income of 219.00M and revenue of 1.21B, resulting in an operating margin of 18.2%.

OSBC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Old Second Bancorp, Inc. reported a net income of 25.59M and revenue of 98.35M, resulting in a net margin of 26.0%.

CMA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Comerica Incorporated reported a net income of 176.00M and revenue of 1.21B, resulting in a net margin of 14.6%.


Frequently Asked Questions


OSBC and CMA have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for OSBC and CMA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer