ORR vs. SENT

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

ORR (Militia Long/Short Equity ETF) and SENT (AdvisorShares Alpha DNA Equity Sentiment ETF) are both Long-Short funds. ORR is actively managed, while SENT is passively managed. Over the past year, ORR returned 26.34% vs 0.00% for SENT. ORR charges 14.19%/yr vs 1.01%/yr for SENT.

Performance

ORR vs. SENT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Militia Long/Short Equity ETF (ORR) and AdvisorShares Alpha DNA Equity Sentiment ETF (SENT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

ORR

• 1D: 1.24%
• 1M: 0.62%
• YTD: 5.30%
• 6M: 8.24%
• 1Y: 26.34%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SENT

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: 0.00%
• 6M: 0.00%
• 1Y: 0.00%
• 3Y*: -3.03%
• 5Y*: -4.30%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ORR vs. SENT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
ORR Militia Long/Short Equity ETF	5.30%	32.15%
SENT AdvisorShares Alpha DNA Equity Sentiment ETF	0.00%	0.00%

Return for Risk

ORR vs. SENT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ORR

ORR Risk / Return Rank: 54
ORR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 57
ORR Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
ORR Omega Ratio Rank: 54
ORR Calmar Ratio Rank: 56
ORR Martin Ratio Rank: 46

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ORR vs. SENT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Militia Long/Short Equity ETF (ORR) and AdvisorShares Alpha DNA Equity Sentiment ETF (SENT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ORR	SENT	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.96	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.74	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.34	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.84	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	7.76	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ORR	SENT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.96	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	-0.34	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.78	-0.25	+2.03

Drawdowns

ORR vs. SENT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ORR drawdown since its inception was -9.85%, smaller than the maximum SENT drawdown of -30.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ORR and SENT.

Drawdown Indicators

	ORR	SENT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-9.85%	-30.34%	+20.49%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.85%	0.00%	-9.85%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-15.83%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-30.34%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.96%	-27.23%	+19.27%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.16%	-20.89%	+18.73%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.61%	0.00%	+3.61%

Volatility

ORR vs. SENT - Volatility Comparison

Militia Long/Short Equity ETF (ORR) has a higher volatility of 4.02% compared to AdvisorShares Alpha DNA Equity Sentiment ETF (SENT) at 0.00%. This indicates that ORR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SENT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ORR	SENT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.02%	0.00%	+4.02%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.90%	0.00%	+10.90%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.55%	0.00%	+13.55%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.34%	12.67%	+2.67%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.34%	13.32%	+2.02%

ORR vs. SENT - Expense Ratio Comparison

ORR has a 14.19% expense ratio, which is higher than SENT's 1.01% expense ratio.

Dividends

ORR vs. SENT - Dividend Comparison

Neither ORR nor SENT has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is riskier, ORR or SENT?

ORR has higher volatility (4.02%) compared to SENT (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ORR dropped -9.85% vs SENT's -30.34%.

Which ETF is better, ORR or SENT?

On 1-year performance, ORR leads with 26.34% vs 0.00% for SENT. On fees, SENT is cheaper at 1.01% per year. On volatility, SENT has been the lower-risk option at 0.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ORR or SENT?

Over the 1-year period, ORR has performed better with a 26.34% return vs 0.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ORR or SENT?

SENT is cheaper with a 1.01% expense ratio, compared with 14.19% for ORR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ORR or SENT?

ORR and SENT have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between ORR and SENT?

They also come from different issuers: Militia Investments and AdvisorShares. Their fees differ too: 14.19% for ORR and 1.01% for SENT.