ORCX vs. NRGU

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

ORCX (Defiance Daily Target 2X Long ORCL ETF) and NRGU (MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN) are both Leveraged Equities funds. ORCX is actively managed, while NRGU is passively managed. Over the past year, ORCX returned 15.78% vs 156.99% for NRGU. At a 0.09 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ORCX charges 1.29%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for NRGU.

Performance

ORCX vs. NRGU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Defiance Daily Target 2X Long ORCL ETF (ORCX) and MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN (NRGU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ORCX achieves a 16.25% return, which is significantly lower than NRGU's 129.31% return.

ORCX

• 1D: -11.49%
• 1M: 55.88%
• YTD: 16.25%
• 6M: -1.67%
• 1Y: 15.78%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

NRGU

• 1D: 2.53%
• 1M: -6.67%
• YTD: 129.31%
• 6M: 97.01%
• 1Y: 156.99%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ORCX vs. NRGU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
ORCX Defiance Daily Target 2X Long ORCL ETF	16.25%	-16.76%
NRGU MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN	129.31%	-33.00%

Correlation

The correlation between ORCX and NRGU is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.02
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 21, 2025	0.09

The correlation between ORCX and NRGU shifts across timeframes, from -0.02 (1 year) to 0.09 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

ORCX vs. NRGU - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	ORCX	NRGU
Technology	100.0%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	100.0%
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

ORCX vs. NRGU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ORCX

ORCX Risk / Return Rank: 15
ORCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 10
ORCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 23
ORCX Omega Ratio Rank: 21
ORCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
ORCX Martin Ratio Rank: 10

NRGU

NRGU Risk / Return Rank: 58
NRGU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 62
NRGU Sortino Ratio Rank: 48
NRGU Omega Ratio Rank: 48
NRGU Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
NRGU Martin Ratio Rank: 56

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ORCX vs. NRGU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Daily Target 2X Long ORCL ETF (ORCX) and MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN (NRGU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ORCX	NRGU	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.12	2.11	-1.98
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.25	2.43	-1.19
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.14	1.30	-0.16
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.18	3.95	-3.77
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.28	9.88	-9.61
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ORCX vs. NRGU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ORCX Sharpe Ratio is 0.12, which is lower than the NRGU Sharpe Ratio of 2.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ORCX and NRGU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ORCX	NRGU	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.12	2.11	-1.98
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.02	0.45	-0.47

Drawdowns

ORCX vs. NRGU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ORCX drawdown since its inception was -85.98%, which is greater than NRGU's maximum drawdown of -57.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ORCX and NRGU.

Drawdown Indicators

	ORCX	NRGU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-85.98%	-57.50%	-28.48%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-85.98%	-39.95%	-46.03%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-64.17%	-20.91%	-43.26%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-44.40%	-25.42%	-18.98%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	57.49%	15.96%	+41.53%

Volatility

ORCX vs. NRGU - Volatility Comparison

Defiance Daily Target 2X Long ORCL ETF (ORCX) has a higher volatility of 36.85% compared to MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN (NRGU) at 31.63%. This indicates that ORCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NRGU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ORCX	NRGU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	36.85%	31.63%	+5.22%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	82.26%	61.27%	+20.99%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	127.97%	75.15%	+52.82%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	121.00%	89.15%	+31.85%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	121.00%	89.15%	+31.85%

ORCX vs. NRGU - Expense Ratio Comparison

ORCX has a 1.29% expense ratio, which is higher than NRGU's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

ORCX vs. NRGU - Dividend Comparison

Neither ORCX nor NRGU has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ORCX and NRGU in my portfolio?

ORCX and NRGU have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ORCX or NRGU?

ORCX has higher volatility (36.85%) compared to NRGU (31.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ORCX dropped -85.98% vs NRGU's -57.50%.

Which ETF is better, ORCX or NRGU?

On 1-year performance, NRGU leads with 156.99% vs 15.78% for ORCX. On fees, NRGU is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, NRGU has been the lower-risk option at 31.63%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ORCX or NRGU?

Over the 1-year period, NRGU has performed better with a 156.99% return vs 15.78%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ORCX or NRGU?

NRGU is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.29% for ORCX.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ORCX or NRGU?

ORCX and NRGU have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between ORCX and NRGU?

They also come from different issuers: Defiance and BMO. Their fees differ too: 1.29% for ORCX and 0.95% for NRGU.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

NRGU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.11 vs 0.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.