PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
OR vs. HL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

OR vs. HL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd (OR) and Hecla Mining Company (HL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with OR having a -16.97% return and HL slightly lower at -17.53%. Over the past 10 years, OR has underperformed HL with an annualized return of 9.90%, while HL has yielded a comparatively higher 10.98% annualized return.


OR

1D
-1.58%
1M
-10.39%
6M
-23.87%
YTD
-16.97%
1Y
5.75%
3Y*
28.20%
5Y*
18.38%
10Y*
9.90%

HL

1D
0.19%
1M
5.54%
6M
-29.50%
YTD
-17.53%
1Y
150.61%
3Y*
44.14%
5Y*
17.81%
10Y*
10.98%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OR vs. HL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
OR
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd
-16.97%96.95%28.14%19.96%0.02%-2.01%32.58%12.20%-22.72%20.74%
HL
Hecla Mining Company
-17.53%291.70%2.82%-12.93%6.99%-18.97%91.83%44.43%-40.37%-24.08%

Correlation

The correlation between OR and HL is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.71

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.67

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.65

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016

0.65

The correlation between OR and HL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.71 - a consistent structural relationship.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

OR:

$5.49B

HL:

$10.61B

EPS

OR:

$1.34

HL:

$0.83

PE Ratio

OR:

21.81

HL:

19.05

PEG Ratio

OR:

0.12

HL:

0.08

PS Ratio

OR:

17.03

HL:

6.77

PB Ratio

OR:

3.74

HL:

4.15

Total Revenue (TTM)

OR:

$325.18M

HL:

$1.57B

Gross Profit (TTM)

OR:

$275.03M

HL:

$788.95M

EBITDA (TTM)

OR:

$330.83M

HL:

$864.40M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

OR vs. HL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OR
OR Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
OR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OR Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
OR Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
OR Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
OR Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

HL
HL Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
HL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HL Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
HL Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
HL Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
HL Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OR vs. HL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd (OR) and Hecla Mining Company (HL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ORHLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

1.33

-0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.26

3.05

-2.79

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.60

6.03

-5.44

OR vs. HL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OR Sharpe Ratio is 0.22, which is lower than the HL Sharpe Ratio of 2.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OR and HL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

OR vs. HL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OR drawdown since its inception was -61.90%, smaller than the maximum HL drawdown of -97.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OR and HL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ORHLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.90%

-97.92%

+36.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-38.54%

-55.81%

+17.27%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-38.54%

-55.81%

+17.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.54%

-55.81%

+17.27%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-61.90%

-82.45%

+20.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-38.43%

-50.25%

+11.82%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.16%

-69.90%

+51.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

16.70%

28.11%

-11.41%

Volatility

OR vs. HL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd (OR) is 13.74%, while Hecla Mining Company (HL) has a volatility of 17.79%. This indicates that OR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ORHLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.74%

17.79%

-4.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

38.47%

53.33%

-14.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

45.74%

73.28%

-27.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

36.04%

59.43%

-23.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

38.60%

62.82%

-24.22%

Dividends

OR vs. HL - Dividend Comparison

OR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.79%, more than HL's 0.09% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HL
Hecla Mining Company
0.09%0.08%0.81%0.65%0.40%0.72%0.25%0.29%0.42%0.25%0.19%0.53%
OR
Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd
0.79%0.59%1.02%1.34%1.38%1.37%1.18%1.56%1.72%1.56%1.65%0.00%

Financials

OR vs. HL - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd and Hecla Mining Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00100.00M200.00M300.00M400.00MJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
101.41M
411.43M
(OR) Total Revenue
(HL) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

OR vs. HL - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd and Hecla Mining Company over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%JulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
86.1%
61.6%
Portfolio components
OR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd reported a gross profit of 87.28M and revenue of 101.41M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 86.1%.

HL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Hecla Mining Company reported a gross profit of 253.26M and revenue of 411.43M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 61.6%.

OR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd reported an operating income of 79.13M and revenue of 101.41M, resulting in an operating margin of 78.0%.

HL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Hecla Mining Company reported an operating income of 223.11M and revenue of 411.43M, resulting in an operating margin of 54.2%.

OR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd reported a net income of 72.56M and revenue of 101.41M, resulting in a net margin of 71.6%.

HL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Hecla Mining Company reported a net income of 266.45M and revenue of 411.43M, resulting in a net margin of 64.8%.


Frequently Asked Questions


OR and HL have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HL has higher volatility (17.79%) compared to OR (13.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OR dropped -61.90% vs HL's -97.92%.

HL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.32 vs 0.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for OR and HL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer