PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
OR.PA vs. WM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

OR.PA vs. WM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in L'Oréal S.A. (OR.PA) and Waste Management, Inc. (WM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

OR.PA is traded in EUR, while WM is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the WM values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OR.PA achieves a 8.54% return, which is significantly higher than WM's 2.26% return. Over the past 10 years, OR.PA has underperformed WM with an annualized return of 11.36%, while WM has yielded a comparatively higher 14.99% annualized return.


OR.PA

1D
1.81%
1M
9.28%
YTD
8.54%
6M
7.53%
1Y
7.24%
3Y*
0.41%
5Y*
1.96%
10Y*
11.36%

WM

1D
0.38%
1M
1.62%
YTD
2.26%
6M
4.15%
1Y
-5.86%
3Y*
9.75%
5Y*
12.16%
10Y*
14.99%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OR.PA vs. WM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
OR.PA
L'Oréal S.A.
8.54%9.18%-22.98%36.99%-18.84%35.74%19.27%33.32%10.83%10.59%
WM
Waste Management, Inc.
2.26%-2.61%21.83%12.71%1.43%54.58%-3.23%33.40%10.27%9.17%

Correlation

The correlation between OR.PA and WM is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.06

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.04

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.09

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.17

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 7, 2007

0.23

The correlation between OR.PA and WM shifts across timeframes, from 0.04 (3 years) to 0.23 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

OR.PA vs. WM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OR.PA
OR.PA Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
OR.PA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OR.PA Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
OR.PA Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
OR.PA Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
OR.PA Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

WM
WM Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
WM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WM Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
WM Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
WM Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
WM Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OR.PA vs. WM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L'Oréal S.A. (OR.PA) and Waste Management, Inc. (WM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


OR.PAWMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.51

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.80

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

0.97

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.38

-0.35

+0.74

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.73

-0.72

+1.45

OR.PA vs. WM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OR.PA Sharpe Ratio is 0.23, which is higher than the WM Sharpe Ratio of -0.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OR.PA and WM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

OR.PA vs. WM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OR.PA drawdown since its inception was -50.83%, which is greater than WM's maximum drawdown of -33.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OR.PA and WM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


OR.PAWMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.83%

-33.02%

-17.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.20%

-16.54%

+1.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.92%

-23.29%

-6.63%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.92%

-23.29%

-6.63%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-29.92%

-30.63%

+0.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.33%

-13.48%

+2.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.67%

-7.80%

-1.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.05%

8.05%

0.00%

Volatility

OR.PA vs. WM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for L'Oréal S.A. (OR.PA) is 6.19%, while Waste Management, Inc. (WM) has a volatility of 6.82%. This indicates that OR.PA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


OR.PAWMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.19%

6.82%

-0.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.89%

15.26%

+4.63%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.72%

20.32%

+5.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.56%

19.62%

+4.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.57%

20.66%

+1.91%

Dividends

OR.PA vs. WM - Dividend Comparison

OR.PA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.84%, more than WM's 1.61% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
OR.PA
L'Oréal S.A.
1.84%1.91%1.93%1.33%1.44%0.96%1.24%1.46%1.76%3.57%3.58%3.48%
WM
Waste Management, Inc.
1.61%1.50%1.49%1.56%1.66%1.38%1.85%1.80%2.09%1.97%2.31%2.89%

Financials

OR.PA vs. WM - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between L'Oréal S.A. and Waste Management, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Please note, different currencies. OR.PA values in EUR, WM values in USD

Frequently Asked Questions


OR.PA and WM have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for OR.PA and WM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer