PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Risk Analysis
Optimization
Factor Model
See All Tools
Portfolio Analysis
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
NG vs. IBE.MC
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


NGIBE.MC
YTD Return-18.98%-1.14%
1Y Return-46.65%1.29%
3Y Return (Ann)-30.87%4.67%
5Y Return (Ann)-4.98%11.19%
10Y Return (Ann)-1.24%11.54%
Sharpe Ratio-0.860.11
Daily Std Dev52.50%16.18%
Max Drawdown-97.85%-72.78%
Current Drawdown-85.53%-2.49%

Fundamentals


NGIBE.MC
Market Cap$984.09M€73.05B
EPS-$0.14€0.91
PE Ratio13.4612.76
PEG Ratio0.003.02
Revenue (TTM)$0.00€46.55B
Gross Profit (TTM)$0.00€20.20B
EBITDA (TTM)-$22.42M€15.09B

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.2

The correlation between NG and IBE.MC is 0.17, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

NG vs. IBE.MC - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, NG achieves a -18.98% return, which is significantly lower than IBE.MC's -1.14% return. Over the past 10 years, NG has underperformed IBE.MC with an annualized return of -1.24%, while IBE.MC has yielded a comparatively higher 11.54% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


300.00%400.00%500.00%600.00%700.00%800.00%December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
461.11%
783.03%
NG
IBE.MC

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


NovaGold Resources Inc.

Iberdrola S.A.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

NG vs. IBE.MC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NovaGold Resources Inc. (NG) and Iberdrola S.A. (IBE.MC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NG
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for NG, currently valued at -0.84, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.004.00-0.84
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for NG, currently valued at -1.12, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.00-1.12
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for NG, currently valued at 0.87, compared to the broader market0.501.001.500.87
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for NG, currently valued at -0.49, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.00-0.49
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for NG, currently valued at -1.24, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.00-1.24
IBE.MC
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for IBE.MC, currently valued at 0.02, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.004.000.02
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for IBE.MC, currently valued at 0.15, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.000.15
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for IBE.MC, currently valued at 1.02, compared to the broader market0.501.001.501.02
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for IBE.MC, currently valued at 0.01, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.01
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for IBE.MC, currently valued at 0.04, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.000.04

NG vs. IBE.MC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NG Sharpe Ratio is -0.86, which is lower than the IBE.MC Sharpe Ratio of 0.11. The chart below compares the 12-month rolling Sharpe Ratio of NG and IBE.MC.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.00-0.500.000.501.00December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-0.84
0.02
NG
IBE.MC

Dividends

NG vs. IBE.MC - Dividend Comparison

NG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IBE.MC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.62%.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
NG
NovaGold Resources Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IBE.MC
Iberdrola S.A.
3.62%3.42%3.34%3.28%2.77%3.10%3.76%2.07%2.04%0.37%6.25%5.75%

Drawdowns

NG vs. IBE.MC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NG drawdown since its inception was -97.85%, which is greater than IBE.MC's maximum drawdown of -72.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NG and IBE.MC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-80.00%-60.00%-40.00%-20.00%0.00%December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-85.53%
-8.46%
NG
IBE.MC

Volatility

NG vs. IBE.MC - Volatility Comparison

NovaGold Resources Inc. (NG) has a higher volatility of 16.16% compared to Iberdrola S.A. (IBE.MC) at 4.58%. This indicates that NG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBE.MC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
16.16%
4.58%
NG
IBE.MC

Financials

NG vs. IBE.MC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between NovaGold Resources Inc. and Iberdrola S.A.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Please note, different currencies. NG values in USD, IBE.MC values in EUR