PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NG vs. ^TNX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

NG vs. ^TNX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NovaGold Resources Inc. (NG) and Cboe 10-Year Treasury Note Yield Index (^TNX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NG achieves a -18.88% return, which is significantly lower than ^TNX's 8.31% return. Over the past 10 years, NG has underperformed ^TNX with an annualized return of 1.68%, while ^TNX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.06% annualized return.


NG

1D
-3.08%
1M
-2.20%
YTD
-18.88%
6M
-25.00%
1Y
82.61%
3Y*
18.18%
5Y*
-1.83%
10Y*
1.68%

^TNX

1D
1.30%
1M
-1.08%
YTD
8.31%
6M
8.16%
1Y
3.06%
3Y*
6.44%
5Y*
24.84%
10Y*
11.06%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NG vs. ^TNX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NG
NovaGold Resources Inc.
-18.88%179.88%-10.96%-37.46%-12.83%-29.06%7.92%126.84%0.51%-13.82%
^TNX
Cboe 10-Year Treasury Note Yield Index
8.31%-8.97%18.29%-0.34%156.55%64.89%-52.21%-28.56%11.68%-1.68%

Correlation

The correlation between NG and ^TNX is -0.24, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.24

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.21

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.19

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.22

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 4, 2003

-0.09

The correlation between NG and ^TNX shifts across timeframes, from -0.24 (1 year) to -0.09 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NG vs. ^TNX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NG
NG Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
NG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NG Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
NG Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
NG Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
NG Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

^TNX
^TNX Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
^TNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
^TNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
^TNX Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
^TNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
^TNX Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NG vs. ^TNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NovaGold Resources Inc. (NG) and Cboe 10-Year Treasury Note Yield Index (^TNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NG^TNXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.92

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.36

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.04

+0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.59

0.26

+1.34

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.61

0.47

+3.14

NG vs. ^TNX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NG Sharpe Ratio is 1.12, which is higher than the ^TNX Sharpe Ratio of 0.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NG and ^TNX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NG vs. ^TNX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NG drawdown since its inception was -97.85%, roughly equal to the maximum ^TNX drawdown of -96.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NG and ^TNX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NG^TNXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-97.85%

-96.85%

-1.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-52.11%

-11.94%

-40.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-52.30%

-27.41%

-24.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-73.33%

-27.41%

-45.92%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-81.22%

-84.57%

+3.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-55.75%

-71.53%

+15.78%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-58.02%

-55.00%

-3.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

22.98%

6.58%

+16.40%

Volatility

NG vs. ^TNX - Volatility Comparison

NovaGold Resources Inc. (NG) has a higher volatility of 21.07% compared to Cboe 10-Year Treasury Note Yield Index (^TNX) at 3.69%. This indicates that NG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ^TNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NG^TNXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

21.07%

3.69%

+17.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

61.86%

10.75%

+51.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

74.33%

15.15%

+59.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

59.81%

32.20%

+27.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

56.05%

47.96%

+8.09%

Frequently Asked Questions


NG and ^TNX have a correlation of -0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NG has higher volatility (21.07%) compared to ^TNX (3.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NG dropped -97.85% vs ^TNX's -96.85%.

NG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.12 vs 0.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NG and ^TNX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer