PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
OPGSX vs. MLPDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

OPGSX vs. MLPDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Gold & Special Minerals Fund (OPGSX) and Invesco SteelPath MLP Income Fund Class A (MLPDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OPGSX achieves a 3.54% return, which is significantly lower than MLPDX's 19.67% return. Over the past 10 years, OPGSX has outperformed MLPDX with an annualized return of 15.19%, while MLPDX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.87% annualized return.


OPGSX

1D
1.33%
1M
1.97%
YTD
3.54%
6M
10.42%
1Y
57.81%
3Y*
38.46%
5Y*
16.13%
10Y*
15.19%

MLPDX

1D
0.88%
1M
-0.30%
YTD
19.67%
6M
18.47%
1Y
23.06%
3Y*
22.12%
5Y*
18.92%
10Y*
9.87%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OPGSX vs. MLPDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
OPGSX
Invesco Gold & Special Minerals Fund
3.54%131.03%13.05%6.35%-16.86%-2.75%36.15%46.37%-13.15%17.17%
MLPDX
Invesco SteelPath MLP Income Fund Class A
19.67%7.69%24.00%20.32%25.11%44.69%-25.75%18.07%-13.12%-8.61%

Correlation

The correlation between OPGSX and MLPDX is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.07

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.19

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.31

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.24

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 6, 2010

0.25

The correlation between OPGSX and MLPDX shifts across timeframes, from -0.07 (1 year) to 0.31 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

OPGSX vs. MLPDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OPGSX
OPGSX Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
OPGSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OPGSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
OPGSX Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
OPGSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
OPGSX Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank

MLPDX
MLPDX Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
MLPDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MLPDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
MLPDX Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
MLPDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
MLPDX Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OPGSX vs. MLPDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Gold & Special Minerals Fund (OPGSX) and Invesco SteelPath MLP Income Fund Class A (MLPDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


OPGSXMLPDXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.58

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.97

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.36

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.28

4.05

-1.77

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.89

12.88

-6.99

OPGSX vs. MLPDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OPGSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.54, which is comparable to the MLPDX Sharpe Ratio of 2.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OPGSX and MLPDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


OPGSXMLPDXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.54

2.12

-0.58

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

1.09

-0.60

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.47

0.38

+0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.26

0.32

-0.07

Drawdowns

OPGSX vs. MLPDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OPGSX drawdown since its inception was -80.04%, roughly equal to the maximum MLPDX drawdown of -77.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OPGSX and MLPDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


OPGSXMLPDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-80.04%

-77.09%

-2.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-29.01%

-6.10%

-22.91%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.01%

-14.45%

-14.56%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-47.09%

-17.98%

-29.11%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.09%

-72.90%

+25.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-22.32%

-4.44%

-17.88%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-29.29%

-13.40%

-15.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.74%

1.91%

+8.83%

Volatility

OPGSX vs. MLPDX - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Gold & Special Minerals Fund (OPGSX) has a higher volatility of 13.17% compared to Invesco SteelPath MLP Income Fund Class A (MLPDX) at 4.95%. This indicates that OPGSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MLPDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


OPGSXMLPDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.17%

4.95%

+8.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

35.90%

8.83%

+27.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

43.24%

11.67%

+31.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

33.57%

17.42%

+16.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.88%

25.76%

+7.12%

OPGSX vs. MLPDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

OPGSX has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is lower than MLPDX's 9.02% expense ratio.


Dividends

OPGSX vs. MLPDX - Dividend Comparison

OPGSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.41%, less than MLPDX's 6.62% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MLPDX
Invesco SteelPath MLP Income Fund Class A
6.62%7.51%6.42%7.72%8.49%9.74%17.44%17.48%13.70%10.99%10.00%11.12%
OPGSX
Invesco Gold & Special Minerals Fund
0.41%0.43%0.86%0.81%0.45%3.56%1.55%0.29%0.00%2.78%7.21%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


OPGSX and MLPDX have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

OPGSX has higher volatility (13.17%) compared to MLPDX (4.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OPGSX dropped -80.04% vs MLPDX's -77.09%.

MLPDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.12 vs 1.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for OPGSX and MLPDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer